Results from phase II trial of HSP90 inhibitor, STA-9090 (ganetespib), in metastatic uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare form of melanoma without effective therapy. The biology of UM relies on several heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90)-dependent molecules such as MET, MEK and AKT, making Hsp90 inhibition a rational approach. Patients with stage IV UM, measurable disease, and no previous chemotherapy were eligible. Patients received either ganetespib 200 mg weekly (cohort A) or 150 mg twice a week (cohort B). Primary endpoint response rate (RR) was assessed by RECIST. A total of 17 patients were accrued for this study, with seven in cohort A and 10 in cohort B. Liver metastases were present in 59%. Response outcomes included one partial response, four stable disease, 11 progressive disease, and one withdrawal for ORR: 5.9% and disease control rate of 29.4%. Progression-free survival was 1.6 months (cohort A) and 1.8 months (cohort B). Overall survival was 8.5 months (cohort A) and 4.9 months (cohort B). An overall 31% of adverse events were grade 3–4 and were mostly related to gastrointestinal toxicities. Early on-treatment (1 months) positron emission tomography showed reduction in metabolic activity in 24% of patients, suggesting a pharmacodynamic effect of Hsp90 inhibition. These early metabolic changes did not seem to be durable and/or clinically significant in relation to the 2-month response assessment. Hsp90 inhibition with ganetespib resulted in modest clinical benefit on two dosing schedules and was associated with significant, although manageable, gastrointestinal toxicity. Evidence of pharmacodynamic activity for Hsp90 inhibition was observed via positron emission tomography, which did not translate into clinical benefit, suggesting rapid development of resistance.

[1]  A. K. Srivastava,et al.  Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma with adoptive transfer of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: a single-centre, two-stage, single-arm, phase 2 study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  E. Espinosa,et al.  Phase II multicenter, single arm, open label study of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with ipilimumab (IPI) as first line in adult patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM): GEM1402 NCT02626962. , 2017 .

[3]  Richard D Carvajal,et al.  Uveal melanoma: epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of primary disease , 2017, Clinical ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma treated with PD‐1 and PD‐L1 antibodies , 2016, Cancer.

[5]  Helen X. Chen,et al.  A randomized phase 2 study of trametinib with or without GSK2141795 in patients with advanced uveal melanoma. , 2016 .

[6]  R. Carvajal,et al.  Clinical Management of Uveal and Conjunctival Melanoma. , 2016, Oncology.

[7]  N. Hayward,et al.  Deep sequencing of uveal melanoma identifies a recurrent mutation in PLCB4 , 2015, Oncotarget.

[8]  C. Nutting,et al.  Results of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Phase III Trial of Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Compared with Best Available Care for Patients with Melanoma Liver Metastases , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  S. Sheng,et al.  A phase II trial of ganetespib, a heat shock protein 90 Hsp90) inhibitor, in patients with docetaxel-pretreated metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-a prostate cancer clinical trials consortium (PCCTC) study , 2016, Investigational New Drugs.

[10]  K. Jhaveri,et al.  Ganetespib: research and clinical development , 2015, OncoTargets and therapy.

[11]  F. Khuri,et al.  A randomized phase II study of ganetespib, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel in second-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (GALAXY-1). , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  A. Enk,et al.  Phase II DeCOG-Study of Ipilimumab in Pretreated and Treatment-Naïve Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  G. Linette,et al.  Effect of selumetinib vs chemotherapy on progression-free survival in uveal melanoma: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[14]  S. Chandarlapaty,et al.  A phase II open-label study of ganetespib, a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor for patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2014, Clinical breast cancer.

[15]  J. Larkin,et al.  Phase I dose-escalation study of the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor AEB071 in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. , 2014 .

[16]  A. Giobbie-Hurder,et al.  Clinical activity of ipilimumab for metastatic uveal melanoma , 2013, Cancer.

[17]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3 , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[18]  W. Guo,et al.  A Multicenter Phase II Study of Ganetespib Monotherapy in Patients with Genotypically Defined Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  A. Bowcock,et al.  Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[20]  W. Guo,et al.  A first in human, safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity phase I study of once weekly administration of the Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib (STA-9090) in patients with solid malignancies , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[21]  J. Fletcher,et al.  An open-label phase II study of the Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib (STA-9090) in patients (pts) with metastatic and/or unresectable GIST. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  D. Proia,et al.  Multifaceted Intervention by the Hsp90 Inhibitor Ganetespib (STA-9090) in Cancer Cells with Activated JAK/STAT Signaling , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  A. Bowcock,et al.  Frequent Mutation of BAP1 in Metastasizing Uveal Melanomas , 2010, Science.

[24]  J. O'Brien,et al.  Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  D. DeAngelo,et al.  A Phase I Study of the Potent Hsp90 Inhibitor STA-9090 Administered Twice Weekly In Subjects with Hematologic Malignancies , 2010 .

[26]  E. Simpson,et al.  Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue nevi , 2008, Nature.

[27]  D. Faingold,et al.  Immune Expression and Inhibition of Heat Shock Protein 90 in Uveal Melanoma , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  Peter W. Chen,et al.  Uveal melanoma expression of indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase: establishment of an immune privileged environment by tryptophan depletion. , 2007, Experimental eye research.

[29]  S. Lindquist,et al.  HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  N. Hayward,et al.  Activation of the MAPK pathway is a common event in uveal melanomas although it rarely occurs through mutation of BRAF or RAS , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  G. Saldanha,et al.  High BRAF mutation frequency does not characterize all melanocytic tumor types , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[32]  A. Bedikian,et al.  Phase II evaluation of temozolomide in metastatic choroidal melanoma , 2003, Melanoma research.

[33]  L. Parvinen,et al.  Bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine and dacarbazine (BOLD) in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b for metastatic uveal melanoma. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[34]  Neal Rosen,et al.  Crystal Structure of an Hsp90–Geldanamycin Complex: Targeting of a Protein Chaperone by an Antitumor Agent , 1997, Cell.

[35]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .