Special Issue on The Semantic Web for the Legal Domain - Guest Editors’ Editorial: The Next Step

Ontology-driven systems with reasoning capabilities in the legal field are now better understood. Legal concepts are not discrete, but make up a dynamic continuum between common sense terms, specific technical use, and professional knowledge, in an evolving institutional reality. Thus, the tension between a plural understanding of regulations and a more general understanding of law is bringing into view a new landscape in which general legal frameworks — grounded in well-known legal theories stemming from 20th-century c. legal positivism or sociological jurisprudence — is made compatible with specific forms of rights management on the Web. In this sense, Semantic Web tools are not only being designed for information retrieval, classification, clustering, and knowledge management. They can also be understood as regulatory tools, i.e. as components of the contemporary legal architecture, to be used by multiple stakeholders — front-line practitioners, policy-makers, legal drafters, companies, market agents, and citizens. That is the issue broadly addressed in this Special Issue on the Semantic Web for the Legal Domain, over-viewing the work carried out over the last fifteen years, and seeking to foster new research in this field, beyond the state of the art.

[1]  Guido Governatori,et al.  LegalRuleML: Design Principles and Foundations , 2015, Reasoning Web.

[2]  Mirina Grosz,et al.  World Wide Web Consortium , 2010 .

[3]  L. Floridi,et al.  The Ethics of Information , 2013, Dialogue.

[4]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  License Linked Data Resources Pattern , 2013, WOP.

[5]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  A Constructive Framework for Legal Ontologies , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[6]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  The Live OWL Documentation Environment: A Tool for the Automatic Generation of Ontology Documentation , 2012, EKAW.

[7]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[8]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Tim Clark.  Next Generation Scientific Publishing and the Web of Data , 2014, Semantic Web.

[10]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  VOWL 2: User-Oriented Visualization of Ontologies , 2014, EKAW.

[11]  J. Carroll,et al.  Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[12]  Núria Casellas.  Legal ontology engineering : methodologies, modelling trends, and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge , 2011 .

[13]  Nandana Mihindukulasooriya,et al.  Rights declaration in Linked Data , 2013, COLD.

[14]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  A Linked Term Bank of Copyright-Related Terms , 2015, JURIX.

[15]  Leonardo Lesmo,et al.  Modificatory provisions detection: a hybrid NLP approach , 2013, ICAIL.

[16]  R. V. Kralingen.  Frame-Based Conceptual Models Of Statute Law , 1995 .

[17]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Rule Interchange and Applications, International Symposium, RuleML 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, November 5-7, 2009. Proceedings , 2009, RuleML.

[18]  Ugo Pagallo,et al.  The Laws of Robots - Crimes, Contracts, and Torts , 2013, Law, Governance and Technology Series.

[19]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[20]  Simonetta Montemagni,et al.  A two-level knowledge approach to support multilingual legislative drafting , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[21]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology: Advanced intelligent technologies for dispute resolution , 2010 .

[22]  Fouad Zablith,et al.  The OU Linked Open Data: Production and Consumption , 2011, Linked Learning@ESWC.

[23]  Nuno Silva,et al.  Defining Human-Machine Micro-Task Workflows for Constitution Making , 2015, GDN.

[24]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  Linking legal open data: breaking the accessibility and language barrier in european legislation and case law , 2015, ICAIL.

[25]  Albert Meroño-Peñuela,et al.  Ontological Semantics for Data Privacy Compliance: The NEURONA Project , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Intelligent Information Privacy Management.

[26]  David M. Shotton,et al.  Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[27]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic enhancement for legal information retrieval: Iuriservice performance , 2007, ICAIL.

[28]  Angelo Di Iorio,et al.  Managing semantics in XML vocabularies: an experience in the legal and legislative domain , 2010 .

[29]  Nikolaos Laoutaris,et al.  Data Transparency Lab Kick Off Workshop (DTL 2014) Report , 2015, CCRV.

[30]  Alexander Boer,et al.  Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web , 2009, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[31]  James A. Hendler,et al.  US Government Linked Open Data: Semantic.data.gov , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[32]  Axel Polleres,et al.  Agreement Technologies and the Semantic Web , 2013 .

[33]  Jorge González-Conejero,et al.  Privacy-by-Norms Privacy Expectations in Online Interactions , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops.

[34]  Silvio Peroni,et al.  Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data , 2015, J. Documentation.

[35]  Graham Greenleaf,et al.  The Meaning of 'Free Access to Legal Information': A Twenty Year Evolution , 2012 .

[36]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Legislative XML: Principles and Technical Tools , 2012 .

[37]  Wim Peters,et al.  The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS , 2007, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[38]  Yolanda Gil,et al.  A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[39]  V. Richard Benjamins,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - 21st International Conference, EKAW 2018, Nancy, France, November 12-16, 2018, Proceedings , 2018, EKAW.

[40]  David M. Shotton,et al.  Adventures in Semantic Publishing: Exemplar Semantic Enhancements of a Research Article , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontology Engineering in a Networked World , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[42]  Enrico Francesconi.  Semantic model for legal resources: Annotation and reasoning over normative provisions , 2016, Semantic Web.

[43]  Simon Steyskal,et al.  If you can't enforce it, contract it: Enforceability in Policy-Driven (Linked) Data Markets , 2015, SEMANTiCS.

[44]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  A Linked-Data-Driven and Semantically-Enabled Journal Portal for Scientometrics , 2013, SEMWEB.

[45]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Towards a country-independent data format: the Akoma Ntoso experience , 2007 .

[46]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Moving in the Time: An Ontology for Identifying Legal Resources , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[47]  Alessandro Mazzei,et al.  FrameNet model of the suspension of norms , 2011, ICAIL.

[48]  Graham Greenleaf.  AustLII’s Business Models: Constraints and Opportunities in Funding Free Access to Law , 2009 .

[49]  Monica Palmirani.  Legislative Change Management with Akoma-Ntoso , 2011 .

[50]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Monica Palmirani,et al.  Legal Rules Modelling Meets the Web , 2013, DoCoPe@JURIX.

[52]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Normative Multi-Agent Systems , 2013, Normative Multi-Agent Systems.

[53]  Pompeu Casanovas.  Conceptualisation of rights and meta-rule of law for the web of data , 2015 .

[54]  M. Poblet.  Visualizing the law: crisis mapping as an open tool for legal practice , 2013 .

[55]  Boris Motik,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: structural specification and functional-style syntax , 2008 .

[56]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  On the Interactional Meaning of Fundamental Legal Concepts , 2014, JURIX.

[57]  Boris Motik,et al.  Hypertableau Reasoning for Description Logics , 2009, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[58]  A. Valente,et al.  Legal Knowledge Engineering - A Modelling Approach , 1995 .

[59]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Legal Knowledge Conveyed by Narratives: Towards a Representational Model , 2014, CMN.

[60]  Serena Villata,et al.  One License to Compose Them All - A Deontic Logic Approach to Data Licensing on the Web of Data , 2013, SEMWEB.

[61]  Andre Valente,et al.  A functional ontology of law , 1994 .

[62]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Collective knowledge systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[63]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  Spatial Planning on the Semantic Web , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[64]  David Shotton,et al.  Publishing: Open citations , 2013, Nature.

[65]  Silvio Peroni.  Semantic Web Technologies and Legal Scholarly Publishing , 2014 .

[66]  Jie Lin,et al.  Linked legal data: improving access to regulations , 2012, dg.o '12.

[67]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web - Channelling the Legal Information Flood , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[68]  Ivan Herman,et al.  RDFa 1.1 Core - Second Edition , 2013 .

[69]  Enrico Motta,et al.  LOTED2: An ontology of European public procurement notices , 2016, Semantic Web.

[70]  Fabien L. Gandon,et al.  Semantic Web Evaluation Challenges , 2015, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[71]  Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel,et al.  Overview of the MPEG-21 Media Contract Ontology , 2016, Semantic Web.

[72]  Francisco J. Serón,et al.  PPROC, an ontology for transparency in public procurement , 2016, Semantic Web.

[73]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Constructing a legal core ontology: LRI-Core , 2004 .

[74]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  At your service, on the definition of services from sources of law , 2015, ICAIL.

[75]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law and ICT: State of the Art and Trends in European Research , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[76]  Steve Pettifer,et al.  Ceci n'est pas un hamburger: modelling and representing the scholarly article , 2011, Learn. Publ..

[77]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies , 2011, Semantic Web.

[78]  Robert Stevens,et al.  The Protege OWL Experience , 2005, OWLED.

[79]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[80]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic Web: A Legal Case Study , 2006 .

[81]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications , 2005, Law and the Semantic Web.

[82]  Simonetta Montemagni,et al.  Building an ontological support for multilingual legislative drafting , 2007, JURIX.

[83]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[84]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic Web Regulatory Models: Why Ethics Matter , 2015 .

[85]  Sascha Ossowski.  Agreement Technologies , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[86]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Design Patterns for Legal Ontology Constructions , 2007, LOAIT.

[87]  C. Michael Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  World Wide Web Consortium , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[88]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Ontologies in the Legal Domain , 2008, Digital Government.

[89]  Anita de Waard,et al.  From Proteins to Fairytales: Directions in Semantic Publishing , 2010, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[90]  Rosa Gil,et al.  A web ontologies framework for digital rights management , 2007, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[91]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  An OWL ontology library representing judicial interpretations , 2016, Semantic Web.

[92]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Fighting Organized Crime Through Open Source Intelligence: Regulatory Strategies of the CAPER Project , 2014, JURIX.

[93]  Maria-Teresa Sagri,et al.  Metadata for content description in legal information , 2003, 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003. Proceedings..

[94]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Toward a New Generation of Semantic Web Applications , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[95]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Akoma-Ntoso for Legal Documents , 2011 .

[96]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law and Technology: Looking into the future - selected essays , 2009 .

[97]  Maarten Marx,et al.  The quality of the XML Web , 2013, J. Web Semant..

[98]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Crowd Intelligence: Foundations, Methods, and Practices (CROWD 2014) , 2014 .

[99]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  Detecting Regulatory Compliance for Business Process Models through Semantic Annotations , 2008, Business Process Management Workshops.

[100]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, two core ontologies for law , 2004 .

[101]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Multi-layer Markup and Ontological Structures in Akoma Ntoso , 2009, AICOL Workshops.

[102]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  Ontology Representation - Design Patterns and Ontologies that Make Sense , 2009, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[103]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[104]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Linked Data for science and education , 2013, Semantic Web.

[105]  Hugh Glaser,et al.  Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[106]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Tools for the Automatic Generation of Ontology Documentation: A Task-Based Evaluation , 2013, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[107]  Giuseppe Contissa,et al.  Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling , 2009, RuleML.

[108]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web , 2008, CACM.

[109]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  A web observatory for the machine processability of structured data on the web , 2014, WebSci '14.

[110]  Michael Curtotti,et al.  Machine learning for readability of legislative sentences , 2015, ICAIL.

[111]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  A co-regulatory approach to stay safe online: reporting inappropriate content with the MediaKids mobile app , 2017 .

[112]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  OWL ontology of basic legal concepts (LKIF-Core) , 2007 .

[113]  Serge Gutwirth,et al.  Reforming European Data Protection Law , 2014 .

[114]  Louis Y. Y. Lu,et al.  A survey of intellectual property rights literature from 1971 to 2012: The main path analysis , 2014, Proceedings of PICMET '14 Conference: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology; Infrastructure and Service Integration.