On establishing generalized analytical phase control conditions in two body self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters

Abstract It is widely suggested that step gains in wave energy converter power capture performance must be realized to achieve economic viability. One method of fulfilling power capture gains is to invoke resonant conditions between the device and the incoming ocean wave. However, a general method that can establish the prerequisites for achieving resonant conditions in an arbitrarily complex wave energy converter architecture is nonexistent. In this work, we present an analytical procedure, built on the mechanical circuit framework, for identifying the resonant conditions of an arbitrarily complex wave energy converter architecture. To demonstrate the procedure, we select three complex two body point absorber devices as a case study, each with a geometry controllable feature set. Through invoking resonant conditions in each architecture, we illustrate how the choice of topology has significant influence on the power capture characteristics of the WEC device. Selecting the highest performing architecture, we then reveal how the analytical equations can be applied to promote technology innovation by supplying design criterion prior to locking down the WEC design. Finally, we apply the analytics within a numerical case study and present a hierarchy describing the incremental performance improvements realized through implementing steps in control complexity for this device.

[1]  M.C. Smith,et al.  The missing mechanical circuit element , 2009, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[2]  Umesh A. Korde,et al.  On providing a reaction for efficient wave energy absorption by floating devices , 1999 .

[3]  B. Buckham,et al.  A method for comparing wave energy converter conceptual designs based on potential power capture , 2018 .

[4]  P Nebel,et al.  Maximizing the Efficiency of Wave-Energy Plant Using Complex-Conjugate Control , 1992 .

[5]  D. Evans A theory for wave-power absorption by oscillating bodies , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  A. R. Wallace,et al.  On the capture width of wave energy converters , 2009 .

[7]  F-C Wang,et al.  Designing and testing a hydraulic inerter , 2011 .

[8]  Malcolm C. Smith Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Bradley J. Buckham,et al.  On establishing an analytical power capture limit for self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters based on dynamic response , 2018, Applied Energy.

[10]  Shengyuan Xu,et al.  Semiactive Inerter and Its Application in Adaptive Tuned Vibration Absorbers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Semi-Active Suspension with Semi-Active Inerter and Semi-Active Damper , 2014 .

[12]  G. Iglesias,et al.  The economics of wave energy: A review , 2015 .

[13]  Johannes Falnes,et al.  Wave-Energy Conversion Through Relative Motion Between Two Single-Mode Oscillating Bodies , 1999 .

[14]  Chiang C. Mei,et al.  POWER EXTRACTION FROM WATER WAVES , 1976 .

[15]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies , 2010 .

[16]  Bradley J. Buckham,et al.  Power Take-Off Simulation for Scale Model Testing of Wave Energy Converters , 2017 .

[17]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems: Linear Interactions Including Wave-Energy Extraction , 2002 .

[18]  Bradley J. Buckham,et al.  Experimental and numerical comparisons of self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters in regular waves , 2015 .