sudden loss of the deep brain stimulation effect with high impedance without macroscopic fracture: a case report and review of the published literature

: The number of deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware complications has increased during the past decade. In cases of abnormally high lead impedance with no evidence of a macroscopic fracture, optimal treatment options have not yet been established. Here, we present the case of a 49-year-old woman with a 12-year history of Parkinson’s disease who received bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS in March 2006. The patient showed good control of parkinsonism until December 24, 2010, when she awoke with abrupt worsening of parkinsonian symptoms. At telemetric testing, lead impedances were found at . 2,000 Ω in all four leads on the left side. Fracture of a lead or an extension wire was suspected. However, radiological screening and palpation revealed no macroscopic fracture. In June 2011, the implantable pulse generator (IPG) was changed under local anesthesia without any complications. Postoperatively, her parkinsonism immediately improved to the previous level, and the lead impedance readings by telemetry were also normalized. The disconnection of the neurostimulator connector block and the hybrid circuit board of the IPG was confirmed by destructive analysis. The present report illustrates that a staged approach that starts with simple IPG replacement can be an option for some cases of acute DBS effect loss with high impedance, when radiological findings are normal, thereby sparing the intact electrodes and extension wires.

[1]  S. Cooper,et al.  Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review , 2014, Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders.

[2]  Matt Stead,et al.  Current clinical application of deep-brain stimulation for essential tremor , 2013, Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment.

[3]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Complications in Patients with Movement Disorders: Risk Factors and Clinical Correlations , 2012, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[4]  J. Obeso,et al.  Hardware complications in deep brain stimulation: electrode impedance and loss of clinical benefit. , 2012, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[5]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of complications related to deep brain stimulation hardware , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  M. Haghjoo Pacing System Malfunction: Evaluation and Troubleshooting , 2011 .

[7]  Giuseppe Boriani,et al.  Management of patients receiving implantable cardiac defibrillator shocks: recommendations for acute and long-term patient management. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Okun,et al.  Identification and management of deep brain stimulation intra- and postoperative urgencies and emergencies. , 2010, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[9]  P. Brugières,et al.  Paroxysmal positive symptoms caused by hardware malfunctioning in deep brain stimulation , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  Sierra M Farris,et al.  Lead Wire Fracture Associated With Normal Therapeutic Impedance Measurements in a Patient With a Kinetra Neurostimulator , 2010, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[11]  Atchar Sudhyadhom,et al.  A case-based review of troubleshooting deep brain stimulator issues in movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. , 2008, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[12]  J. Vitek,et al.  Deep brain stimulation hardware complications: The role of electrode impedance and current measurements , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[13]  G. Baltuch,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation Inactivity Can Produce Unexpected High Electrode Impedances when Reactivated, Leading to a False Conclusion of Wire Fracture , 2006, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[14]  Robert M Brownstone,et al.  Reducing Hardware-Related Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation , 2005, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[15]  F. Alesch Sudden failure of dual channel pulse generators , 2005, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  A. Samii,et al.  Mechanical failure of the electrode wire in deep brain stimulation. , 2004, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[17]  Tipu Aziz,et al.  Hardware‐Related problems of deep brain stimulation , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[18]  G. Baltuch,et al.  Revision of deep brain stimulator for tremor. Technical note. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  R. Alterman,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation Fault Testing , 2008 .