Tactile Sensibility through Tactile Display: Effect of the Array Density and Clinical Use

Sensing in humans is carried out in different modalities, among them, the touch is essential in every-day life allowing most of all the manual activities. Less known is the fundamental role in the screening of some neurological diseases. In fact it is possible, trough the assessment of the level of tactile perception, to evaluate during clinical/medical diagnosis the nervous systemhealth state. It is therefore fundamental to determine valid measurement procedures aiming to this task. The analysis has started with the investigation of tactile frequency sensibility, on healthy subjects, who examined tactile stimuli with devices called arrays. Arrays are formed by passive pins, which follow the shape of the stimuli. There were different arrays depending on the number of pins on them. The only task of subjects was to recognize the higher between couples of stimuli (one grating) with different frequency. The aim of these tests is that of creating a diagnostic scale for tactile neurodegenerative syndromes and diseases. Results show a significant role of pins density with a performance that falls when pins distance is higher than 1 mm. Preliminary clinical tests on 3 patients with tunnel carpal syndrome suggest positive development for use as a diagnostic tool.

[1]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Weak spatial constancy in touch , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[2]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Feeling through Tactile Displays: A Study on the Effect of the Array Density and Size on the Discrimination of Tactile Patterns , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[4]  A. Pestronk,et al.  Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork , 2004, Neurology.

[5]  Stanley Finger,et al.  Cutaneous sensory spots and the “law of specific nerve energies”: history and development of ideas , 1999, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  D. Keizer,et al.  Quantitative Sensory Testing With Von Frey Monofilaments in Patients With Allodynia: What Are We Quantifying? , 2008, The Clinical journal of pain.

[7]  D K Yue,et al.  Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[8]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Human Tactile Ability to Discriminate Variations in Small Ridge Patterns thorugh a Portable-Wearable Tactile Display , 2010, 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[9]  J. Bell-Krotoski,et al.  The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. , 1987, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  Knut Drewing,et al.  Texture discrimination in active touch: Effects of the extension of the exploration and their exploitation , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[11]  R. Johansson.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Osamu Komiyama,et al.  Intraoral Measurement of Tactile and Filament-prick Pain Threshold Using Shortened Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments , 2008, The Clinical journal of pain.

[13]  Antonio Frisoli,et al.  Design of a SMA actuated 2-DoF tactile device for displaying tangential skin displacement , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[14]  J Booth,et al.  Differences in the performance of commercially available 10-g monofilaments. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[15]  G Westling,et al.  Tactile unit properties after human cervical spinal cord injury. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Sangyeoup Lee,et al.  Clinical usefulness of the two-site Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. , 2003, Journal of Korean medical science.

[17]  M. U. WERNER,et al.  Humidity affects the performance of von Frey monofilaments , 2011, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  Léon Plaghki,et al.  An adaptive procedure for routine measurement of light‐touch sensitivity threshold , 2010, Muscle and Nerve.

[19]  B. O'Shaughnessy.  The sense of touch , 1989 .

[20]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Effect of the tactile array density on the discrimination of edge patterns: Implications for tactile systems design , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics.

[21]  S Weinstein,et al.  Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality , 1968 .

[22]  K. Andrews,et al.  The effect of changes in temperature and humidity on the accuracy of von Frey hairs , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  On the 1/f noise and non-integer harmonic decay of the interaction of a finger sliding on flat and sinusoidal surfaces , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[24]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[25]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of gratings , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  William R. Provancher,et al.  Design of a Fingertip-Mounted Tactile Display with Tangential Skin Displacement Feedback , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[27]  A W Goodwin,et al.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: effect of contact angle and force of the grating on afferent fiber responses , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  W. Post,et al.  Quantifying Allodynia in Patients Suffering From Unilateral Neuropathic Pain Using Von Frey Monofilaments , 2007, The Clinical journal of pain.

[29]  M. Zigler,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Perceptions Roughness and Smoothness , 1923 .