Cis-regulatory determinants of MyoD function

Abstract Muscle-specific transcription factor MyoD orchestrates the myogenic gene expression program by binding to short DNA motifs called E-boxes within myogenic cis-regulatory elements (CREs). Genome-wide analyses of MyoD cistrome by chromatin immnunoprecipitation sequencing shows that MyoD-bound CREs contain multiple E-boxes of various sequences. However, how E-box numbers, sequences and their spatial arrangement within CREs collectively regulate the binding affinity and transcriptional activity of MyoD remain largely unknown. Here, by an integrative analysis of MyoD cistrome combined with genome-wide analysis of key regulatory histones and gene expression data we show that the affinity landscape of MyoD is driven by multiple E-boxes, and that the overall binding affinity—and associated nucleosome positioning and epigenetic features of the CREs—crucially depend on the variant sequences and positioning of the E-boxes within the CREs. By comparative genomic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) across publicly available data from 17 strains of laboratory mice, we show that variant sequences within the MyoD-bound motifs, but not their genome-wide counterparts, are under selection. At last, we show that the quantitative regulatory effect of MyoD binding on the nearby genes can, in part, be predicted by the motif composition of the CREs to which it binds. Taken together, our data suggest that motif numbers, sequences and their spatial arrangement within the myogenic CREs are important determinants of the cis-regulatory code of myogenic CREs.

[1]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts , 1987, Cell.

[2]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selection. , 1990, Science.

[3]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Tissue-specific gene activation by MyoD: determination of specificity by cis-acting repression elements. , 1994, Genes & development.

[4]  Carl O. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of MyoD bHLH domain-DNA complex: Perspectives on DNA recognition and implications for transcriptional activation , 1994, Cell.

[5]  B. Hurlburt,et al.  Preferential Binding of MyoD-E12 versus Myogenin-E12 to the Murine Sarcoma Virus Enhancer in Vitro(*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  T. Blackwell,et al.  Establishment of Distinct MyoD, E2A, and Twist DNA Binding Specificities by Different Basic Region-DNA Conformations , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[7]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Promoter-specific regulation of MyoD binding and signal transduction cooperate to pattern gene expression. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[8]  Zhijin Wu,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Use of Mixture Models in a Microarray-Based Screening Procedure for Detecting Differentially Represented Yeast Mutants , 2011 .

[9]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[10]  E. Wilson,et al.  Control of MyoD Function during Initiation of Muscle Differentiation by an Autocrine Signaling Pathway Activated by Insulin-like Growth Factor-II* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  David Haussler,et al.  The UCSC genome browser database: update 2007 , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[13]  B. Ren,et al.  Genome-wide prediction of transcription factor binding sites using an integrated model , 2010, Genome Biology.

[14]  W. L. Ruzzo,et al.  Genome-wide MyoD binding in skeletal muscle cells: a potential for broad cellular reprogramming. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[15]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[16]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Variation in Transcription Factor Binding Among Humans , 2010, Science.

[17]  Mary Goldman,et al.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011 , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Thomas M. Keane,et al.  Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation , 2011, Nature.

[19]  Felix Naef,et al.  Genome-Wide and Phase-Specific DNA-Binding Rhythms of BMAL1 Control Circadian Output Functions in Mouse Liver , 2011, PLoS biology.

[20]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors Determine Cell-Type-Specific Responses to TGF-β Signaling , 2011, Cell.

[21]  Myong-Hee Sung,et al.  Transcription factor AP1 potentiates chromatin accessibility and glucocorticoid receptor binding. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[22]  Kevin Y. Yip,et al.  Understanding transcriptional regulation by integrative analysis of transcription factor binding data , 2012, Genome research.

[23]  Gareth A. Palidwor,et al.  Transcriptional dominance of Pax7 in adult myogenesis is due to high-affinity recognition of homeodomain motifs. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[24]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Snail regulates MyoD binding-site occupancy to direct enhancer switching and differentiation-specific transcription in myogenesis. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[25]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes , 2012, Nature.

[26]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Abraham P. Fong,et al.  Genetic and epigenetic determinants of neurogenesis and myogenesis. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[28]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Modeling the relative relationship of transcription factor binding and histone modifications to gene expression levels in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  E. Eyras,et al.  Nucleosome-driven transcription factor binding and gene regulation. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[30]  Theodore J. Perkins,et al.  MaSC: mappability-sensitive cross-correlation for estimating mean fragment length of single-end short-read sequencing data , 2013, Bioinform..

[31]  L. Grøntved,et al.  eRNAs promote transcription by establishing chromatin accessibility at defined genomic loci. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[32]  Jonathan K. Pritchard,et al.  The Functional Consequences of Variation in Transcription Factor Binding , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[33]  T. Meehan,et al.  An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues , 2014, Nature.

[34]  Theodore J. Perkins,et al.  BIDCHIPS: bias decomposition and removal from ChIP-seq data clarifies true binding signal and its functional correlates , 2015, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[35]  Scott Forth,et al.  Dynamic regulation of transcription factors by nucleosome remodeling , 2015, eLife.