Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system.

Thorough familiarity with the anatomy of the neck depicted in axial sections is fundamental to the interpretation of computed tomography (CT) scans. Fifteen consecutive sections are selected at 1 cm-intervals beginning at the level of the nasopharynx and extending down to the level of the thoracic inlet. Each scan is referenced to a profile drawing of the neck. Each CT scan is reproduced in the line drawing, which is labeled for major organs and discrete structures appearing in that section. Twelve representative cases illustrate the usefulness of CT in the evaluation of neck masses by documenting tumor size, location and relationship to adjacent structures. Intravenous contrast improves recognition of vascular structures and distinguishes lymph nodes from blood vessels. The location and relative density of lesions facilitate their specific identification. Demineralization of bone and cartilage is accurately documented in the illustrative cases. Symmetry is the key to the interpretation of subtle pathologies.

[1]  B Håkansson,et al.  Skull simulator for direct bone conduction hearing devices. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  Ó. Bjarnason,et al.  Maternal Rubella in Iceland 1963-1964: Some Observations on 37 Children with Rubella Syndrome , 1972 .

[3]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Soft tissue infection around a skin penetrating osseointegrated implant. A case report. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[4]  A Tjellström,et al.  Five-year experience with skin-penetrating bone-anchored implants in the temporal bone. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  A Tjellström,et al.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation. , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  B. Hagerman,et al.  Reliability in the Determination of Speech Discrimination , 1976 .

[7]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. , 1988, The American journal of otology.

[8]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[9]  A Speech-to-Noise Ratio Test with the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: A Comparative Study , 1986, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  B Hagerman,et al.  Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[11]  J. Kelly,et al.  Clinical results with a percutaneous bone‐anchored hearing aid , 1989, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  J. Jerger,et al.  Hearing aid evaluation. Clinical experience with a new philosophy. , 1976, Archives of otolaryngology.

[13]  A Tjellström,et al.  Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[14]  B. Håkansson,et al.  Percutaneous Vs. Transcutaneous Transducers for Hearing by Direct Bone Conduction , 1990, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  A Tjellström,et al.  Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. , 1981, The American journal of otology.