Microscopic medical image classification framework via deep learning and shearlet transform

Abstract. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in US after cardiovascular disease. Image-based computer-aided diagnosis can assist physicians to efficiently diagnose cancers in early stages. Existing computer-aided algorithms use hand-crafted features such as wavelet coefficients, co-occurrence matrix features, and recently, histogram of shearlet coefficients for classification of cancerous tissues and cells in images. These hand-crafted features often lack generalizability since every cancerous tissue and cell has a specific texture, structure, and shape. An alternative approach is to use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn the most appropriate feature abstractions directly from the data and handle the limitations of hand-crafted features. A framework for breast cancer detection and prostate Gleason grading using CNN trained on images along with the magnitude and phase of shearlet coefficients is presented. Particularly, we apply shearlet transform on images and extract the magnitude and phase of shearlet coefficients. Then we feed shearlet features along with the original images to our CNN consisting of multiple layers of convolution, max pooling, and fully connected layers. Our experiments show that using the magnitude and phase of shearlet coefficients as extra information to the network can improve the accuracy of detection and generalize better compared to the state-of-the-art methods that rely on hand-crafted features. This study expands the application of deep neural networks into the field of medical image analysis, which is a difficult domain considering the limited medical data available for such analysis.

[1]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Evaluation and benchmark for biological image segmentation , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Derek C. Rose,et al.  Deep Machine Learning - A New Frontier in Artificial Intelligence Research [Research Frontier] , 2010, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[3]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[4]  Lai-Man Po,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment with shearlet transform and deep neural networks , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[5]  Yoshua. Bengio,et al.  Learning Deep Architectures for AI , 2007, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[6]  Glenn R. Easley,et al.  Shearlet-Based Total Variation Diffusion for Denoising , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Mohammad H. Mahoor,et al.  Automatic Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Using Shearlet Transform and Multiple Kernel Learning , 2016, J. Imaging.

[8]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Phase Congruency Detects Corners and Edges , 2003, DICTA.

[10]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors , 2012, ArXiv.

[11]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Tree-structured grading of pathological images of prostate , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Fabio A. González,et al.  Automatic detection of invasive ductal carcinoma in whole slide images with convolutional neural networks , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  The importance of phase in image processing filters , 1975 .

[15]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images with Deep Neural Networks , 2013, MICCAI.

[16]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  J. S. Marron,et al.  Hierarchical task-driven feature learning for tumor histology , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[18]  B. Yener,et al.  Automated cancer diagnosis based on histopathological images : a systematic survey , 2005 .

[19]  G. Easley,et al.  Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform , 2008 .

[20]  P H Bartels,et al.  A hybrid neural and statistical classifier system for histopathologic grading of prostatic lesions. , 1995, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[21]  Mohammad H. Mahoor,et al.  Prostate cancer detection and gleason grading of histological images using shearlet transform , 2013, 2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[22]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[23]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Jian Fan,et al.  Texture Classification by Wavelet Packet Signatures , 1993, MVA.

[25]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[26]  Wang-Q Lim,et al.  Optimally Sparse Image Representations using Shearlets , 2006, 2006 Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[27]  Mohammad H. Mahoor,et al.  Diagnosis of prostatic Carcinoma on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using shearlet transform , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Deep learning in neural networks: An overview , 2014, Neural Networks.

[30]  Mohammad H. Mahoor,et al.  A Microscopic Image Classification Method Using Shearlet Transform , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.