Environmental Benefits of Novel Nonhuman Food Inputs to Salmon Feeds.

Global population growth and changing diets increase the importance, and challenges, of reducing the environmental impacts of food production. Farmed seafood is a relatively efficient way to produce protein and has already overtaken wild fisheries. The use of protein-rich food crops, such as soy, instead of fishmeal in aquaculture feed diverts these important protein sources away from direct human consumption and creates new environmental challenges. Single cell proteins (SCPs), including bacteria and yeast, have recently emerged as replacements for plant-based proteins in salmon feeds. Attributional life cycle assessment is used to compare salmon feeds based on protein from soy, methanotrophic bacteria, and yeast ingredients. All ingredients are modeled at the industrial production scale and compared based on seven resource use and emissions indicators. Yeast protein concentrate showed drastically lower impacts in all categories compared to soy protein concentrate. Bacteria meal also had lower impacts than soy protein concentrate for five of the seven indicators. When these target meals were incorporated into complete feeds the relative trends remain fairly constant, but benefits of the novel ingredients are dampened by high impacts from the nontarget ingredients. Particularly, primary production requirements (PPR) are about equal and constant across all feeds for both analyses since PPR was driven by fishmeal and oil. The bacteria-based feed has the highest climate change impacts due to the use of methane to feed the bacteria who then release carbon dioxide. Overall, the results of this study suggest that incorporating SCP ingredients into salmon feeds can help reduce the environmental impacts of salmon production. Continued improvements in SCP production would further increase the sustainability of salmon farming.

[1]  Brandon Kuczenski,et al.  Disclosure of Product System Models in Life Cycle Assessment: Achieving Transparency and Privacy , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[2]  C. W. Tallentire,et al.  Can novel ingredients replace soybeans and reduce the environmental burdens of European livestock systems in the future? , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  G. Baiocchi,et al.  The environmental impacts of rapidly changing diets and their nutritional quality in China , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[4]  Pedro Pellegrini,et al.  Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Øverland,et al.  Yeast derived from lignocellulosic biomass as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture. , 2017, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[6]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe 2016. A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Report 1: Characterization. , 2016 .

[7]  O. R. Eigaard,et al.  Expanding the concept of sustainable seafood using Life Cycle Assessment , 2016 .

[8]  P. Sarker,et al.  Towards Sustainable Aquafeeds: Complete Substitution of Fish Oil with Marine Microalga Schizochytrium sp. Improves Growth and Fatty Acid Deposition in Juvenile Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  F. Ziegler,et al.  Review and advancement of the marine biotic resource use metric in seafood LCAs: a case study of Norwegian salmon feed , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Christian Schader,et al.  Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  T. Åsgård,et al.  Utilisation of feed resources in production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway , 2015 .

[12]  T. Mørkøre,et al.  Metabolism, health and fillet nutritional quality in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed diets containing n-3-rich microalgae , 2015, Journal of Nutritional Science.

[13]  T. Kortner,et al.  Soya Saponins Induce Enteritis in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). , 2015, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[14]  M. Metian,et al.  Feed Matters: Satisfying the Feed Demand of Aquaculture , 2015 .

[15]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health , 2014, Nature.

[16]  Å. Krogdahl,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of IL-17A and other inflammatory markers during the development of soybean meal-induced enteropathy in the distal intestine of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). , 2012, Cytokine.

[17]  Joël Aubin,et al.  Environmental impacts of plant-based salmonid diets at feed and farm scales , 2011 .

[18]  Jessica R. Corman,et al.  Sustainability Challenges of Phosphorus and Food: Solutions from Closing the Human Phosphorus Cycle , 2011 .

[19]  M. Øverland,et al.  Evaluation of methane-utilising bacteria products as feed ingredients for monogastric animals , 2010, Archives of animal nutrition.

[20]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Not all salmon are created equal: life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  A. Farrell,et al.  Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Environmental analysis of the Norwegian fishery and aquaculture industry—A preliminary study focusing on farmed salmon , 2009 .

[23]  M. Metian,et al.  Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects , 2008 .

[24]  N. Halberg,et al.  LCA of soybean meal , 2008 .

[25]  Marta Coll,et al.  Novel index for quantification of ecosystem effects of fishing as removal of secondary production , 2008 .

[26]  K. Dąbrowski,et al.  Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: a review , 2007 .

[27]  M. Tiirola,et al.  Effects of soybean meal based diet on growth performance, gut histopathology and intestinal microbiota of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) , 2006 .

[28]  H. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Salmonid Feeds Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2004, Ambio.

[29]  N. Solomons Plant-based diets are traditional in developing countries: 21st century challenges for better nutrition and health. , 2002, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[30]  R. Hardy,et al.  Dietary substitution of soy and rapeseed protein concentrates for fish meal, and their effects on growth and nutrient utilization in gilthead seabream Sparus aurata L. , 2000 .

[31]  Brown,et al.  Evaluation of fish-meal free diets for rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss , 1998 .

[32]  T. Storebakken,et al.  Availability of protein, phosphorus and other elements in fish meal, soy-protein concentrate and phytase-treated soy-protein-concentrate-based diets to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar , 1998 .

[33]  D. Pauly,et al.  Primary production required to sustain global fisheries , 1995, Nature.

[34]  Stahrl W. Edmunds,et al.  Environmental Impacts , 1977 .

[35]  W. Mirschel,et al.  Agricultural land use changes – a scenario-based sustainability impact assessment for Brandenburg, Germany , 2015 .

[36]  M. Øverland,et al.  Bacteria grown on natural gas prevent soybean meal-induced enteritis in Atlantic salmon. , 2011, The Journal of nutrition.

[37]  Å. Krogdahl,et al.  Alcohol‐soluble components in soybeans cause morphological changes in the distal intestine of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. , 1996 .