The Symbiosis Interactome: a computational approach reveals novel components, functional interactions and modules in Sinorhizobium meliloti

BackgroundRhizobium-Legume symbiosis is an attractive biological process that has been studied for decades because of its importance in agriculture. However, this system has undergone extensive study and although many of the major factors underpinning the process have been discovered using traditional methods, much remains to be discovered.ResultsHere we present an analysis of the 'Symbiosis Interactome' using novel computational methods in order to address the complex dynamic interactions between proteins involved in the symbiosis of the model bacteria Sinorhizobium meliloti with its plant hosts. Our study constitutes the first large-scale analysis attempting to reconstruct this complex biological process, and to identify novel proteins involved in establishing symbiosis. We identified 263 novel proteins potentially associated with the Symbiosis Interactome. The topology of the Symbiosis Interactome was used to guide experimental techniques attempting to validate novel proteins involved in different stages of symbiosis. The contribution of a set of novel proteins was tested analyzing the symbiotic properties of several S. meliloti mutants. We found mutants with altered symbiotic phenotypes suggesting novel proteins that provide key complementary roles for symbiosis.ConclusionOur 'systems-based model' represents a novel framework for studying host-microbe interactions, provides a theoretical basis for further experimental validations, and can also be applied to the study of other complex processes such as diseases.

[1]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[2]  P. Bork,et al.  Dynamic Complex Formation During the Yeast Cell Cycle , 2005, Science.

[3]  B. Rolfe,et al.  Overlap of Proteome Changes in Medicago truncatula in Response to Auxin and Sinorhizobium meliloti1[W][OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[4]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[5]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[6]  S. Szymczak,et al.  Identification of genes relevant to symbiosis and competitiveness in Sinorhizobium meliloti using signature-tagged mutants. , 2008, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[7]  D. Capela,et al.  Sinorhizobium meliloti differentiation during symbiosis with alfalfa: a transcriptomic dissection. , 2006, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[8]  G. Weiller,et al.  A global analysis of protein expression profiles in Sinorhizobium meliloti: discovery of new genes for nodule occupancy and stress adaptation. , 2003, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[9]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Kathryn M. Jones,et al.  How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium–Medicago model , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.

[13]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[14]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[15]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[16]  R. Overbeek,et al.  The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Proteomics.

[18]  C. Vance,et al.  Legumes: Importance and Constraints to Greater Use , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[19]  L. S. Forsberg,et al.  Mesorhizobium loti Produces nodPQ-Dependent Sulfated Cell Surface Polysaccharides , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  Adam J. Smith,et al.  The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  P. Poole,et al.  Mapping the Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 solute-binding protein-dependent transportome , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[23]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  The tYNA platform for comparative interactomics: a web tool for managing, comparing and mining multiple networks , 2006, Bioinform..

[24]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Inference of protein function and protein linkages in Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on prokaryotic genome organization: a combined computational approach , 2003, Genome Biology.

[25]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Analyzing protein function on a genomic scale: the importance of gold-standard positives and negatives for network prediction. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[26]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[27]  H. Krishnan,et al.  NopB, a soybean cultivar-specificity protein from Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257, is a type III secreted protein. , 2004, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[28]  Folker Meyer,et al.  Construction of a Large Signature-Tagged Mini-Tn5 Transposon Library and Its Application to Mutagenesis of Sinorhizobium meliloti , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  S. Lovell,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks and biology—what's the connection? , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Depolarization of alfalfa root hair membrane potential by Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors. , 1992, Science.

[31]  Sailu Yellaboina,et al.  Inferring genome-wide functional linkages in E. coli by combining improved genome context methods: comparison with high-throughput experimental data. , 2007, Genome research.

[32]  P. Aloy,et al.  A molecular interpretation of genetic interactions in yeast , 2008, FEBS letters.

[33]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Investigating Semantic Similarity Measures Across the Gene Ontology: The Relationship Between Sequence and Annotation , 2003, Bioinform..

[34]  angesichts der Corona-Pandemie,et al.  UPDATE , 1973, The Lancet.

[35]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Implementing the iHOP concept for navigation of biomedical literature , 2005, ECCB/JBI.

[36]  D. Cook,et al.  Medicago truncatula--a model in the making! , 1999, Current opinion in plant biology.

[37]  Shailesh V. Date,et al.  A Probabilistic Functional Network of Yeast Genes , 2004, Science.

[38]  G. Stacey,et al.  Genetics and functional genomics of legume nodulation. , 2006, Current opinion in plant biology.

[39]  Christian von Mering,et al.  STRING 7—recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  S. vanDongen.  Graph Clustering by Flow Simulation , 2000 .

[41]  R. Karp,et al.  Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Z N Oltvai,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[43]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Matthew A. Hibbs,et al.  Discovery of biological networks from diverse functional genomic data , 2005, Genome Biology.

[45]  Darren A. Natale,et al.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[46]  A. Becker,et al.  Global transcriptional analysis of the phosphate starvation response in Sinorhizobium meliloti strains 1021 and 2011 , 2004, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[47]  Benjamin Audit,et al.  An exponential core in the heart of the yeast protein interaction network. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[48]  N. Moran,et al.  Molecular Interactions between Bacterial Symbionts and Their Hosts , 2006, Cell.

[49]  X. Gu.  Evolution of duplicate genes versus genetic robustness against null mutations. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[50]  M. Djordjevic.  Sinorhizobium meliloti metabolism in the root nodule: A proteomic perspective , 2004, Proteomics.

[51]  J. Wojcik,et al.  The protein–protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori , 2001, Nature.

[52]  S. Kanaya,et al.  Large-scale identification of protein-protein interaction of Escherichia coli K-12. , 2006, Genome research.

[53]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. , 2004, Genome research.

[54]  B. Schwikowski,et al.  A network of protein–protein interactions in yeast , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  Marc Colet,et al.  wEMBOSS: a web interface for EMBOSS , 2005, Bioinform..

[56]  M. Kuehn,et al.  Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and the host-pathogen interaction. , 2005, Genes & development.

[57]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  COmplete GENome Tracking (COGENT): A Flexible Data Environment for Computational Genomics , 2003, Bioinform..

[58]  Alfredo Martínez,et al.  Tyrosinase from Rhizobium etli Is Involved in Nodulation Efficiency and Symbiosis-Associated Stress Resistance , 2007, Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[59]  Leon Goldovsky,et al.  BioLayout(Java): versatile network visualisation of structural and functional relationships. , 2005, Applied bioinformatics.

[60]  M. Foussard,et al.  Negative autoregulation of the Rhizobium meliloti fixK gene is indirect and requires a newly identified regulator, FixT , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[61]  A. Emili,et al.  Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli , 2005, Nature.

[62]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  The Composite Genome of the Legume Symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti , 2001, Science.

[63]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[64]  Matteo Pellegrini,et al.  Prolinks: a database of protein functional linkages derived from coevolution , 2004, Genome Biology.

[65]  Kathryn M. Jones,et al.  Differential response of the plant Medicago truncatula to its symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti or an exopolysaccharide-deficient mutant , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  R. Sharan,et al.  Network-based prediction of protein function , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[67]  Yasukazu Nakamura,et al.  A Large Scale Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions in the Nitrogen-fixing Bacterium Mesorhizobium loti , 2008, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[68]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A Bayesian Networks Approach for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Genomic Data , 2003, Science.

[69]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events , 1999, Nature.