In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND The in vivo kinematics of squatting after total hip arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to determine the range of motion of the hip joint during squatting after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS Using fluoroscopy, we investigated 15 primary cementless total hip arthroplasties performed using a computed tomography-based navigation system. An acetabular component with concavities around the rim and a femoral component with reduced neck geometry were used. The motion of the acetabular and femoral components based on the neutral standing position was analyzed using a two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration technique. FINDINGS No prosthetic impingement occurred in any hips. The mean maximum hip flexion range of motion was 86.2° (range, 55.1°-117.4°) and was not always consistent with maximum squatting. The mean maximum pelvic posterior tilting angle was 25.7° (range, 5.5°-43.5°). The pelvis began to tilt posteriorly at 50°-70° of the hip flexion range of motion. At maximum squatting, the mean ratio of the pelvic posterior tilting angle to the femoral flexion angle was 23.2% (range, 3.8%-45.7%). The mean minimum angle up to the theoretical prosthetic impingement was 26.2° (range, 11.8°-39.8°). INTERPRETATION Although this is a preliminary study, three-dimensional assessment of dynamic squatting motion after total hip arthroplasty using the two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration technique appears to enable elucidation of the range of motion of the hip joint, the contribution of pelvic posterior tilting, and the minimum angle up to theoretical prosthetic impingement during squatting.

[1]  Takaharu Yamazaki,et al.  In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  J P Conaty,et al.  Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  In vivo kinematics of mobile‐bearing knee arthroplasty in deep knee bending motion , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  U P Wyss,et al.  Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  A model-based method for the reconstruction of total knee replacement kinematics , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  N. Sugano,et al.  Validity and responsiveness of the Oxford hip score in a prospective study with Japanese total hip arthroplasty patients , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[8]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  Clicking and squeaking: in vivo correlation of sound and separation for different bearing surfaces. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Aditya Maheshwari,et al.  Impingement with total hip replacement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Open‐configuration MRI study of femoro‐acetabular impingement , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  Kwon-Yong Lee,et al.  Delayed fracture of a ceramic insert with modern ceramic total hip replacement. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  Stefan M. Gabriel,et al.  Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Yasuharu Nakashima,et al.  Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  Shin-Yoon Kim,et al.  Ceramic Liner Fracture after Cementless Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  S.A. Banks,et al.  Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M. Froimson,et al.  The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  Mario Lamontagne,et al.  The Effect of Cam FAI on Hip and Pelvic Motion during Maximum Squat , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  T. Hotokebuchi,et al.  Changes in the WOMAC, EuroQol and Japanese lifestyle measurements among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  S. J. Tupling,et al.  Use of cardan angles to locate rigid bodies in three-dimensional space , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  U P Wyss,et al.  Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants , 2001, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[23]  D A Dennis,et al.  An in vivo determination of total hip arthroplasty pistoning during activity. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Visualization of femorotibial contact in total knee arthroplasty using X-ray fluoroscopy. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[25]  W. A. Hodge,et al.  An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  Shantanu Patil,et al.  Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  Comparison of mini-incision total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach and a posterior approach using navigation. , 2009, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[29]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.