Mitigating Exploitation

Much HCI research seeks to contribute to technological agendas that lead to more just and participative labor relations and practices, yet that research also raises concerns about forms of exploitation associated with them. In this paper, we explore how U.S. independent [indie] game developers' socio-technological practices inject forms of labor, capital, and production into the game development industry. Our findings highlight that indie game development 1) seeks to promote an alternative to business models of game development that depend on free and immaterial labor; 2) builds offline networks at different scales to develop collectives that can sustain their production; and 3) emphasizes how distributed collaboration, co-creation, and the use of free tools and middleware make game production more widely accessible. The research contributes to HCI research that seeks to explicate and mitigate emerging forms of exploitation enabled by new technologies and processes. Our critical review of indie developers' practices and strategies also extends the current conceptualization of labor and technology in CSCW.

[1]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[2]  ForteAndrea,et al.  Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research , 2019 .

[3]  Andrea Forte,et al.  Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Bryan C. Semaan,et al.  Moderation Practices as Emotional Labor in Sustaining Online Communities: The Case of AAPI Identity Work on Reddit , 2019, CHI.

[5]  Donghee Yvette Wohn,et al.  Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities: How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience , 2019, CHI.

[6]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Open Source, Open Vision: The MakerPro Network and the Broadening of Participation in Setting Taiwan’s IT Vision Agenda , 2019, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Looking Forward: Conceptual and Methodological Developments in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2018, Qualitative Research in Psychology.

[8]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Bottom-Up Imaginaries: The Cultural-Technical Practice of Inventing Regional Advantage through IT R&D , 2018, CHI.

[9]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  HCI's Making Agendas , 2017, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  J. Byers,et al.  The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry , 2017 .

[11]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Low-Wage Precarious Workers' Sociotechnical Practices Working Towards Addressing Wage Theft , 2017, CHI.

[12]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Supporting Cultures of Making: Technology, Policy, Visions, and Myths , 2017, CHI.

[13]  Yubo Kou,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Moral Labor in an Online Game Community , 2017, CSCW Companion.

[14]  Xiao Ma,et al.  Self-Disclosure and Perceived Trustworthiness of Airbnb Host Profiles , 2017, CSCW.

[15]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[16]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with "Design" , 2016, CHI.

[17]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism , 2016, CHI.

[18]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Hosting via Airbnb: Motivations and Financial Assurances in Monetized Network Hospitality , 2016, CHI.

[19]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Design(ing) 'Here' and 'There': Tech Entrepreneurs, Global Markets, and Reflexivity in Design Processes , 2016, CHI.

[20]  Hamid R. Ekbia,et al.  Social Inequality and HCI: The View from Political Economy , 2016, CHI.

[21]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Designing for Labour: Uber and the On-Demand Mobile Workforce , 2016, CHI.

[22]  Nicola Dell,et al.  The Ins and Outs of HCI for Development , 2016, CHI.

[23]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  CSCW and theSharing Economy: The Future of Platforms as Sites of Work Collaboration and Trust , 2016, CSCW Companion.

[24]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing , 2016, CSCW.

[25]  Tanja Neumann The Video Game Industry Formation Present State And Future , 2016 .

[26]  Amanda Menking,et al.  The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World's Largest Online Encyclopedia , 2015, CHI.

[27]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities , 2015, CHI.

[28]  Jeffrey Holbrook,et al.  Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory , 2014 .

[29]  Andrew Smith,et al.  HCI as a means to prosociality in the economy , 2014, CHI.

[30]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  Fostering social capital in economically distressed communities , 2014, CHI.

[31]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators , 2014, CHI.

[32]  Legitimacy, Validity, and Writing for Free: Fan Fiction, Gender, and the Limits of (Unpaid) Creative Labor , 2014 .

[33]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk , 2013, CHI.

[34]  Christian McCrea Snapshot 4: Australian video games: The collapse and reconstruction of an industry , 2013 .

[35]  Amber Young,et al.  Emotional Labor in the Moderation of Online Communities , 2013 .

[36]  Bart Simon Indie Eh? Some Kind of Game Studies. , 2012 .

[37]  Nadav D. Lipkin Examining Indie's Independence: The Meaning of "Indie" Games, the Politics of Production, and Mainstream Cooptation , 2012 .

[38]  Abigail De Kosnik,et al.  Fandom as Free Labor , 2012 .

[39]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  CrowdForge: crowdsourcing complex work , 2011, UIST.

[40]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  The Concept of ‘Work’ in CSCW , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[41]  F. Simon,et al.  Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 1986, J. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities , 2009, UbiComp.

[43]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[44]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk , 2008, CHI.

[45]  C. Willig,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology , 2007 .

[46]  Harry Hochheiser,et al.  HCI and Societal Issues: A Framework for Engagement , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  J. Rutter,et al.  Digital Games and Cultural Studies , 2006 .

[48]  Tiziana Terranova Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy , 2000 .

[49]  Joan Greenbaum,et al.  Back to labor: returning to labor process discussions in the study of work , 1996, CSCW '96.

[50]  Joan Greenbaum,et al.  Labor is More Than Work: Using labor analysis to study use situations and jobs , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Michaela Hardt,et al.  Radical thought in Italy : a potential politics , 1996 .

[52]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[53]  L. Krefting Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[54]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 . Communist manifesto , 1988 .

[55]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[56]  D. Struik,et al.  The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 , 1932 .

[57]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy , 2011, Forerunners of Realizable Values Accounting in Financial Reporting.