Molecular mechanics of silk nanostructures under varied mechanical loading

Spider dragline silk is a self‐assembling tunable protein composite fiber that rivals many engineering fibers in tensile strength, extensibility, and toughness, making it one of the most versatile biocompatible materials and most inviting for synthetic mimicry. While experimental studies have shown that the peptide sequence and molecular structure of silk have a direct influence on the stiffness, toughness, and failure strength of silk, few molecular‐level analyses of the nanostructure of silk assemblies, in particular, under variations of genetic sequences have been reported. In this study, atomistic‐level structures of wildtype as well as modified MaSp1 protein from the Nephila clavipes spider dragline silk sequences, obtained using an in silico approach based on replica exchange molecular dynamics and explicit water molecular dynamics, are subjected to simulated nanomechanical testing using different force‐control loading conditions including stretch, pull‐out, and peel. The authors have explored the effects of the poly‐alanine length of the N. clavipes MaSp1 peptide sequence and identify differences in nanomechanical loading conditions on the behavior of a unit cell of 15 strands with 840–990 total residues used to represent a cross‐linking β‐sheet crystal node in the network within a fibril of the dragline silk thread. The specific loading condition used, representing concepts derived from the protein network connectivity at larger scales, have a significant effect on the mechanical behavior. Our analysis incorporates stretching, pull‐out, and peel testing to connect biochemical features to mechanical behavior. The method used in this study could find broad applications in de novo design of silk‐like tunable materials for an array of applications. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 97: 408–417, 2012.

[1]  D. Ginzinger,et al.  Silk Properties Determined by Gland-Specific Expression of a Spider Fibroin Gene Family , 1996, Science.

[2]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[3]  R. Lewis,et al.  Extreme Diversity, Conservation, and Convergence of Spider Silk Fibroin Sequences , 2001, Science.

[4]  Xiang‐Yang Liu,et al.  Unraveled mechanism in silk engineering: Fast reeling induced silk toughening , 2009 .

[5]  J. Trancik,et al.  Nanostructural features of a spider dragline silk as revealed by electron and X-ray diffraction studies , 2006 .

[6]  C L Brooks,et al.  Methodological advances in molecular dynamics simulations of biological systems. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Tunable silk: using microfluidics to fabricate silk fibers with controllable properties. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  M B Hinman,et al.  Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. Nephila clavipes dragline silk is a two-protein fiber. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[10]  N. Pierce,et al.  A comparison of the composition of silk proteins produced by spiders and insects. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[11]  H. Hansma,et al.  Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads , 2003, Nature materials.

[12]  B. Meier,et al.  The molecular structure of spider dragline silk: Folding and orientation of the protein backbone , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[14]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Simulations as analytical tools to understand protein aggregation and predict amyloid conformation. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[15]  C. Tanford Macromolecules , 1994, Nature.

[16]  P. Argos,et al.  Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.

[17]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Spider silk protein refolding is controlled by changing pH. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[18]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils. , 2010, Nano letters.

[19]  S. Rammensee,et al.  Assembly mechanism of recombinant spider silk proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Y. Termonia Molecular modeling of spider silk elasticity , 1994 .

[21]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Materials: Surprising strength of silkworm silk , 2002, Nature.

[22]  D. Porter,et al.  The role of kinetics of and amide bonding in protein stability. , 2008, Soft matter.

[23]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Nanoconfinement Controls Stiffness, Strength and Mechanical Toughness of Β-sheet Crystals in Silk , 2010 .

[24]  R. Lewis,et al.  An investigation of the divergence of major ampullate silk fibers from Nephila clavipes and Argiope aurantia. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[25]  R. Lewis,et al.  Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[26]  L W Jelinski,et al.  Molecular Orientation and Two-Component Nature of the Crystalline Fraction of Spider Dragline Silk , 1996, Science.

[27]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Mechanical and thermal properties of dragline silk from the spider Nephila clavipes , 1994 .

[28]  Janelle E. Jenkins,et al.  Determining secondary structure in spider dragline silk by carbon-carbon correlation solid-state NMR spectroscopy. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Theoretical and computational hierarchical nanomechanics of protein materials: Deformation and fracture , 2008 .

[30]  B. Meier,et al.  Local Structure in Spider Dragline Silk Investigated by Two-Dimensional Spin-Diffusion Nuclear Magnetic Resonance† , 1996 .

[31]  C. Viney,et al.  Non-periodic lattice crystals in the hierarchical microstructure of spider (major ampullate) silk. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[32]  J. Gosline,et al.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[33]  F Vollrath,et al.  Predicting the mechanical properties of spider silk as a model nanostructured polymer , 2005, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[34]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies at a critical length scale. , 2008, Nano letters.

[35]  R. Lewis,et al.  Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Characterization of the protein components of Nephila clavipes dragline silk. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[37]  B. Meier,et al.  Supercontracted spider dragline silk: a solid-state NMR study of the local structure. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[38]  Thierry Lefèvre,et al.  Protein secondary structure and orientation in silk as revealed by Raman spectromicroscopy. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[39]  M. Buehler,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the α-helix to β-sheet transition in coiled protein filaments: evidence for a critical filament length scale. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[40]  T. Lefèvre,et al.  Conformation and orientation of proteins in various types of silk fibers produced by Nephila clavipes spiders. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[41]  Lian Li,et al.  Design of superior spider silk: from nanostructure to mechanical properties. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[42]  F Vollrath,et al.  Spider silk fibre extrusion: combined wide- and small-angle X-ray microdiffraction experiments. , 2001, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[43]  Thierry Lefèvre,et al.  Study of protein conformation and orientation in silkworm and spider silk fibers using Raman microspectroscopy. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[44]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[45]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[46]  Janelle E. Jenkins,et al.  Quantitative Correlation between the protein primary sequences and secondary structures in spider dragline silks. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.