Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications

The web-based e-learning system (WELS) has emerged as a new means of skill training and knowledge acquisition, encouraging both academia and industry to invest resources in the adoption of this system. Traditionally, most pre- and post-adoption tasks related to evaluation are carried out from the viewpoints of technology. Since users have been widely recognized as being a key group of stakeholders in influencing the adoption of information systems, their attitudes toward this system are pivotal. Therefore, based on the theory of multi-criteria decision making and the research products of user satisfaction from the fields of human-computer interaction and information systems, this study proposed a multi-criteria methodology from the perspective of learner satisfaction to support those evaluation-based activities taking place at the pre- and post-adoption phases of the WELS life cycle. In addition, by following this methodology, this study empirically investigated learners' perceptions of the relative importance of decision criteria. This investigation carried out a survey of college students, and the data thus obtained was then analyzed by analytic hierarchy process in order to derive an integrated preference structure of learners as a ground for evaluation. We found that learners regarded the learner interface as being the most important dimension of decision criteria. Future applications of these results are recommended and the implications are discussed.

[1]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  What makes learning networks effective? , 2002, CACM.

[2]  Derek Andrews System Analysis & Design Methods: Witton, Bentley and Ho. Published by Times Mirror. 847pp. £17.50 , 1986 .

[3]  Bo-Anders Jönsson A case study of successful e-learning: a web-based distance course in medical physics held for school teachers of the upper secondary level. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[5]  Sheng Wu,et al.  Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Kao Chiang,et al.  Performance of several nonlinear programming software packages on microcomputers , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  N. Melone A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[8]  Ernest H. Forman AHP IS INTENDED FOR MORE THAN EXPECTED VALUE CALCULATIONS , 1990 .

[9]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[10]  John Karat,et al.  Software Evaluation Methodologies , 1988 .

[11]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[12]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[13]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[14]  Connie U. Smith,et al.  A performance model interchange format , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[15]  Andries van Dam User interfaces: disappearing, dissolving, and evolving , 2001, CACM.

[16]  Marc J. Rosenberg,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2000 .

[17]  Maarten Gelderman,et al.  The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Claire M. Fletcher-Flinn,et al.  The Efficacy of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI): A Meta-Analysis , 1995 .

[19]  E. F. Lane,et al.  A CONSISTENCY TEST FOR AHP DECISION MAKERS , 1989 .

[20]  Derek A. Holton,et al.  Students' Satisfaction and Perceived Learning with a Web-based Course , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  J. Sinclair Collins Cobuild English dictionary , 1995 .

[22]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[23]  Ron Chi-Wai Kwok,et al.  Remote learning technologies: effectiveness of hypertext and GSS , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[25]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[26]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[27]  William E. Cashin,et al.  Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. , 1992 .

[28]  Gary Klein,et al.  IS service performance: self-perceptions and user perceptions , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Thomas I. M. Ho,et al.  Systems Analysis Design Methods , 1994 .

[30]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[31]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Validating and applying user satisfaction as a measure of MIS success in small organizations , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Andreas Beu,et al.  Engineering Joy , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[33]  Annemarie Hauf,et al.  Computers in education , 1983 .

[34]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  An examination of the determinants of customer loyalty in mobile commerce contexts , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[37]  P. A. Cohen Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies , 1981 .

[38]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[39]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[40]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness : a test of alternative higher-order structures , 1991 .

[42]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  User interface features influencing overall ease of use and personalization , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Factors Affecting Information Technology Usage: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2001, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..