To prevent and investigate crimes, Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) are conducting various operations which are affecting privacy of citizens. These activities include video surveillance, audio surveillance and technical tracking. Currently, LEAs has power to conduct these operations based on legislation. While law enforcement is applying for more rights based on jurisdiction, public concerns are rising up and open discussions growing. Does a LEA really need broader ways to do surveillance, and are they enforcing the rights they already have in ways which are described in legislation? These concerns are often brought in discussion against rising power of surveillance state. Is it possible to be found a balance between a LEA's operational security needs and individuals' freedom? This paper outlines a scenario how common ground can be found with a constructive approach facilitated by advanced technology. First part of this study shows the need for transparency, because without it there might be no new legislation that LEAs might get. We have evidence that Citizens are willing to give more power to authorities if usage of these intrusive means is more transparent and better monitored by public. Second part of the study shows examples of today's technological possibilities to create transparent and plausible monitoring for surveillance activities. How would it be possible to credibly show peoples that powers are used according to the law? In this part, we describe a system evolving ubiquitous but transparent surveillance, and what kind of difficulties there might be.