Inferring aquifer storage parameters using satellite and in situ measurements: Estimation under uncertainty

[1] We present a robust optimization method for estimating aquifer storage parameters (specific yield or storativity) using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data, in situ well level observations, and other ancillary information. Uncertainty inherent in the remotely sensed and in situ time series can adversely affect the parameter estimation process and, in the worse case, make the solution completely meaningless. Our estimation problem is formulated to directly minimize the negative impact of data uncertainty by incorporating bounds on data variations. We demonstrate our method for the interconnected Edwards-Trinity Plateau and Pecos Valley aquifers in central Texas. The study area is divided into multiple zones based on the geology and monitor well coverage. Our estimated aquifer storage parameters are consistent with previous results obtained from pumping tests and model calibration, demonstrating the potential of using GRACE data for validating regional groundwater model parameters.

[1]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[2]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Estimating groundwater storage changes in the Mississippi River basin (USA) using GRACE , 2007 .

[3]  John Wahr,et al.  Estimating Large-Scale Precipitation Minus Evapotranspiration from GRACE Satellite Gravity Measurements , 2006 .

[4]  S. Swenson,et al.  Estimated accuracies of regional water storage variations inferred from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) , 2003 .

[5]  S. Swenson,et al.  Methods for inferring regional surface‐mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time‐variable gravity , 2002 .

[6]  S. Swenson,et al.  Remote sensing of groundwater storage changes in Illinois using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) , 2006 .

[7]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Terrestrial water mass load changes from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) , 2006 .

[8]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[9]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[10]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Comparison of seasonal terrestrial water storage variations from GRACE with groundwater‐level measurements from the High Plains Aquifer (USA) , 2007 .

[11]  Roberto Anaya,et al.  Update of the Groundwater Availability Model for the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) and Pecos Valley Aquifers of Texas , 2011 .

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Applications of second-order cone programming , 1998 .

[13]  J. Burch,et al.  Estimation of Recharge to the Middle Trinity Aquifer of Central Texas Using Water-Level Fluctuations , 2001 .

[14]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Real‐time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project , 2003 .

[15]  T. Meyers,et al.  Sensitivity of Land Surface Simulations to Model Physics, Land Characteristics, and Forcings, at Four CEOP Sites , 2007 .

[16]  A. Sun,et al.  A constrained robust least squares approach for contaminant release history identification , 2006 .

[17]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Validation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) retrospective forcing over the southern Great Plains : GEWEX Continental-Scale International Project, Part 3 (GCIP3) , 2003 .

[18]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge , 2002 .

[19]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Robust Solutions to Least-Squares Problems with Uncertain Data , 1997, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..