Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability

This study offers a glimpse of the moment-by-moment processes used by highly skilled and average readers during silent reading. The eye movements of adult readers were monitored while they silently read sentences. Fixation durations and the spatial–temporal patterns of eye movements were examined to see whether the two groups of readers exhibited differential effects of frequency and/or predictability. In Experiment 1, high- and low-frequency target words were embedded in nonconstraining sentence contexts. In Experiment 2, the same participants read high- and low-frequency target words that were either predictable or unpredictable, embedded in highly constraining sentence contexts. Results indicated that when target words appeared in highly constraining sentence contexts, the average readers showed different effects of frequency and predictability from those shown in the highly skilled readers. It appears that reading skill can interact with predictability to affect the word recognition processes used during silent reading.

[1]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[2]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[3]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Chapter 3 – Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time , 1998 .

[4]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[5]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  C. Clifton,et al.  Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Less Skilled Readers Have Less Efficient Suppression Mechanisms , 1993, Psychological science.

[9]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: effects of word length and word frequency. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  G Underwood,et al.  Individual Differences in Reading Subprocesses: Relationships Between Reading Ability, Lexical Access, and Eye Movement Control , 1994, Language and speech.

[11]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Eye Fixations Predict Reading Comprehension: The Relationships between Reading Skill, Reading Speed, and Visual Inspection , 1990, Language and speech.

[12]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Processing determinants of reading speed. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  K Rayner,et al.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[17]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Interactive-Compensatory Model of Reading , 1984 .

[18]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Flexibility in the Use of Graphic and Contextual Information by Good and Poor Readers , 1981 .

[19]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Falsification of the hypothesis that word frequency is a unified variable in sentence processing , 1971 .

[20]  Janet E. Davidson,et al.  Information processing correlates of reading , 1985, Journal of Memory and Language.

[21]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[22]  K. Forster.  Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing* , 1981 .

[23]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Coding and Comprehension in Skilled Reading and Implications for Reading Instruction. , 1977 .

[24]  E. B. Huey.  The Psychology And Pedagogy Of Reading , 1908 .

[25]  J. B. Wyman,et al.  What is reading ability , 1921 .

[26]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[30]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  Effects of Context on the Classification of Words and Nonwords. , 1977 .

[33]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Processing Components of College-Level Reading Comprehension. , 1994 .

[34]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  F. Vitu,et al.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  The Role of Lexical Heads in Parsing: Evidence from German , 1997 .

[37]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[38]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.