Individualizing a web-based structure strategy intervention for fifth graders' comprehension of nonfiction.

In the study, we investigated effects of 2 different versions of a web-based tutoring system to provide 5th-grade students with strategy instruction about text structure, which was an intervention to improve reading comprehension. The design feature assessed varied in individualization of instruction (individualized or standard). The more individually tailored version was developed to provide remediation or enrichment lessons matched to the individual needs of each student. Stratified random assignment was used to compare the effects of 2 versions of the 6-month web-based intervention. Students in the individualized condition made greater improvements from pretest to posttest on a standardized reading comprehension test (d 0.55) than did students in the standard condition (d 0.30). Students receiving more individualized instruction demonstrated higher mastery achievement goals when working in the lessons than did students receiving the standard instruction (d 0.53). Students receiving more individualized instruction showed greater improvement in using signaling, better work in lessons, and more positive posttest attitudes toward computers than did students receiving standard instruction. Students in both conditions improved their recall of ideas from texts and their use of the text structure strategy and comparison signaling words.

[1]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[2]  B. Meyer.  The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[3]  P. Alexander,et al.  A Motivated Exploration of Motivation Terminology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[4]  J. Chall,et al.  A FORMULA FOR PREDICTING READABILITY , 1948 .

[5]  J. Birren,et al.  Aging and technological advances , 1985 .

[6]  C. Y. Peng,et al.  Advances in Missing Data Methods and Implications for Educational Research , 2006 .

[7]  P. Lachenbruch,et al.  Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. , 1989 .

[8]  Gayle H. Gregory,et al.  Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Doesn't Fit All , 2001 .

[9]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Web-Based Tutoring of the Structure Strategy With or Without Elaborated Feedback or Choice for Fifth- and Seventh-Grade Readers , 2010 .

[10]  H. Bloom,et al.  Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report. NCEE 2008-4016. , 2008 .

[11]  W. A. Nicewander,et al.  Grade Equivalent and IRT Representations of Growth , 1997 .

[12]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Enhancing Comprehension Skill and Self-Efficacy with Strategy Value Information , 1987 .

[13]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[14]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[15]  Dariush Hooshmand.  The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Reading English as a Foreign Language (Iran) , 1984 .

[16]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[17]  B. Meyer,et al.  Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. , 2002 .

[18]  Ellen B. Mandinach,et al.  Remaking the Concept of Aptitude: Extending the Legacy of Richard E. Snow , 2001 .

[19]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. , 1989 .

[20]  H. Oostendorp,et al.  The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading , 1998 .

[21]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Text Coherence and Readability , 2003 .

[22]  Allison M. McCormack,et al.  Information Age , 1979 .

[23]  John B. Carroll,et al.  Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge , 1972 .

[24]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. , 2002 .

[25]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[26]  Taffy E. Raphael,et al.  The Effects of Instruction in Compare/Contrast Text Structure on Sixth-Grade Students' Reading Comprehension and Writing Products. Research Series No. 161. , 1985 .

[27]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[28]  William J. Hoyer,et al.  Technology and the Older Person: Age, Sex and Experience as Moderators of Attitudes Towards Computers , 1984 .

[29]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[30]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life: Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task , 1989 .

[31]  P. Broek,et al.  The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. , 1999 .

[32]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  iSTART: A Web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. , 2007 .

[33]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[34]  Simonne Pollini,et al.  Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction , 2009 .

[35]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[36]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Does Text Structure/Summarization Instruction Facilitate Learning from Expository Text? Technical Report No. 394. , 1986 .

[37]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children , 1990 .

[38]  D. Ray Reutzel.  Organizing Effective Literacy Instruction: Differentiating Instruction to Meet the Needs of All Literacy Learners , 2007 .

[39]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation , 1982 .

[40]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Teaching Readers about the Structure of Scientific Text. , 1988 .

[41]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Structure Strategy Training and Signaling on Recall of Text. , 2001 .

[42]  Heather H. Mitchell,et al.  AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[43]  P. Pintrich,et al.  An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[44]  Fred Paas,et al.  A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Best practices in literacy instruction, 3rd ed. , 2007 .

[46]  Howard Eisner,et al.  Information Age , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.

[47]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[48]  Fred Paas,et al.  Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training: a comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  David Reinking,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Mediated Text on Measures of Reading Comprehension and Reading Behavior , 1985 .

[50]  A. Baddeley.  Working Memory: The Interface between Memory and Cognition , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations , 1992 .

[52]  L. Corno.  On Teaching Adaptively , 2008 .

[53]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. , 1999 .

[55]  David N. Rapp,et al.  Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[56]  M. E. Otter,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction in Support of Beginning Reading Instruction: A Review , 2002 .

[57]  Patricia M. Cunningham,et al.  Best practices in literacy instruction , 1999 .

[58]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[59]  Mary Ann. Hill,et al.  Spss Missing Value Analysis 7.5 , 1997 .

[60]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Models of Understanding Text , 1996 .

[61]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[62]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Memory Improved: Reading and Memory Enhancement Across the Life Span Through Strategic Text Structures , 1988 .

[63]  J. Chall,et al.  Readability revisited : the new Dale-Chall readability formula , 1995 .

[64]  John B. Black,et al.  Understanding expository text : a theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text , 1986 .

[65]  A. Elliot,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION , 1997 .

[66]  Joseph E. Grimes,et al.  The Thread of Discourse , 1984 .

[67]  William C. Mann,et al.  Relational propositions in discourse , 1986 .

[68]  David Reinking,et al.  Computer-Mediated Text and Comprehension Differences: The Role of Reading Time, Reader Preference, and Estimation of Learning. , 1988 .

[69]  Montreal Canada,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains: Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains. , 2008 .

[70]  Beverley Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors , 2008 .

[71]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning , 2005 .

[72]  S. Sawilowsky.  Real data analysis , 2007 .

[73]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[74]  R. Brennan,et al.  Test equating : methods and practices , 1995 .

[75]  Danielle S. McNamara.  Reading comprehension strategies : theories, interventions, and technologies , 2007 .

[76]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[77]  Che Kan Leong,et al.  Effects of on-Line Reading and Simultaneous Dectalk Auding in Helping Below-Average and Poor Readers Comprehend and Summarize Text , 1995 .

[78]  W. C. Smith,et al.  Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report , 2008 .

[79]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[80]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Children's Developing Awareness of Text Structures in Expository Materials. , 1984 .

[81]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Construct- and criterion-related validity of four commonly used goal orientation instruments. , 2003 .

[82]  Lynley H. Anderman.  Classroom goal orientation, school belonging and social goals as predictors of students' positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school. , 1999 .

[83]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Educational Psychology: Reflection for Action , 2006 .

[84]  Nicole Strangman,et al.  Improving Struggling Readers' Comprehension Through Scaffolded Hypertexts and Other Computer-Based Literacy Programs. , 2006 .

[85]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[86]  Carolyn A. Denton,et al.  The Efficacy of Repeated Reading and Wide Reading Practice for High School Students with Severe Reading Disabilities. , 2010, Learning disabilities research & practice : a publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children.