Application of Type-2 Interval Fuzzy Sets to Contractor Qualification Process

The selection of a general contractor for construction works is one of the most important decisions made throughout the entire construction project. It may be decisive in the success or failure of the project (e.g. delays in the commissioning of works, exceeding the budget, low quality of works). The article presents a method for supporting group decision-making in the contractor qualification process. The proposed method is a development of Mikhailov’s approach to Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. It consists in the aggregation of the decision makers’ judgments using type-2 fuzzy sets, allowing for inaccuracy of the decision-maker’s assessment. The use of an unbiased estimator of standard deviation for determining compromise evaluation enables the small size of the expert group and deviations in their evaluations to be taken into consideration. The quality of the solution obtained through this method was compared with the results obtained by means of Mikhailov’s Fuzzy Preference Programming and Enea & Piazza Method. The use of the proposed method generated better results for this example of preparing a ranking of contractors than the two other methods discussed. The method presented herein may also be proposed for solving decision-making problems in other spheres.

[1]  Mario Enea,et al.  Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[2]  Jerry Mendel,et al.  Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Systems: An Overview [corrected reprint] , 2007, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[4]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall-runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and Extreme Learning Machines , 2015 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[8]  R. Edward Minchin,et al.  Quality-Based Contractor Rating Model for Qualification and Bidding Purposes , 2005 .

[9]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Dispersion of group judgments , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[11]  Gang Kou,et al.  Bayesian revision of the individual pair-wise comparison matrices under consensus in AHP-GDM , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Kuo-Ping Chiao,et al.  Multiple criteria group decision making with triangular interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011).

[13]  Lidija Zadnik Stirn,et al.  Methods based on data envelopment analysis for deriving group priorities in analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  L. Tang Six Sigma: Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts , 2006 .

[15]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Contractor selection using multi criteria utility theory: an additive mode , 1998 .

[16]  R. C. Van den Honert,et al.  Stochastic group preference modelling in the multiplicative AHP: A model of group consensus , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment , 2010 .

[18]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[19]  San Cristobal,et al.  Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods , 2012 .

[20]  Yea-Sang Kim,et al.  A bid decision-making model in the initial bidding phase for overseas construction projects , 2016 .

[21]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[22]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[23]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Group Decision Making and the AHP , 1989 .

[24]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Consensus Building in AHP-Group Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach , 2010, Oper. Res..

[25]  Ana Nieto-Morote,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for construction contractor prequalification , 2012 .

[26]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[27]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi‐attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique , 2008 .

[28]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages , 1994 .

[29]  Sidhartha S. Padhi,et al.  Centralized bid evaluation for awarding of construction projects – A case of India government , 2010 .

[30]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process , 1993 .

[32]  Jingfeng Yuan,et al.  A special Partial Least Squares (PLS) path decision modeling for bid evaluation of large construction projects , 2017 .

[33]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[34]  Erhan Bozdag,et al.  An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Prioritization Approach to Project Risk Assessment , 2016, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[35]  M. T. Escobar,et al.  Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures in Ahp-Group Decision Making , 2007 .

[36]  Edyta Plebankiewicz,et al.  Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets , 2010 .

[37]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[38]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Group preference aggregation in the multiplicative AHP The model of the group decision process and Pareto optimality , 1997 .

[39]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[40]  Serdar Ulubeyli,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for subcontractor selection in international construction projects , 2015 .

[41]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[42]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Contractor selection for construction works by applying saw‐g and topsis grey techniques , 2010 .

[43]  A. Dziadosz,et al.  Wybrane zagadnienia prekwalifikacji wykonawców robót budowlanych , 2006 .

[44]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey , 2004 .

[45]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  A method of aggregation in DS/AHP for group decision-making with the non-equivalent importance of individuals in the group , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[46]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach , 2013, Oper. Res..

[48]  Shanwen Zhang,et al.  Dimension Reduction Using Semi-Supervised Locally Linear Embedding for Plant Leaf Classification , 2009, ICIC.

[49]  Lidija Zadnik Stirn,et al.  Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[51]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Improving Forecasting Accuracy of Annual Runoff Time Series Using ARIMA Based on EEMD Decomposition , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[52]  M. K. Kuzman,et al.  Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[53]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[54]  M. Skitmore,et al.  Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: a taxonomic review , 2015 .

[55]  Ralf H. Kaspar,et al.  Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis , 2016 .

[56]  Heng Li,et al.  Contractor selection using the analytic network process , 2004 .

[57]  Keun-Tae Cho,et al.  A loss function approach to group preference aggregation in the AHP , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[58]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: a New Approach , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[59]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[60]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: an overview , 2007, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[61]  Cheng-Ru Wu,et al.  Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[62]  Zedan Hatush,et al.  Evaluating contractor prequalification data: selection criteria and project success factors , 1997 .