Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control

Theoretically visual gain has been identified as a control variable in models of isometric force. However, visual gain is typically confounded with visual angle and distance, and the relative contribution of visual gain, distance, and angle to the control of force remains unclear. This study manipulated visual gain, distance, and angle in three experiments to examine the visual information properties used to regulate the control of a constant level of isometric force. Young adults performed a flexion motion of the index finger of the dominant hand in 20 s trials under a range of parameter values of the three visual variables. The findings demonstrate that the amount and structure of the force fluctuations were organized around the variable of visual angle, rather than gain or distance. Furthermore, the amount and structure of the force fluctuations changed considerably up to 1°, with little change higher than a 1° visual angle. Visual angle is the critical informational variable for the visuomotor system during the control of isometric force.

[1]  C. B. Gibbs,et al.  Controller design Interactions of controlling limbs, time-lags and gains in positional and velocity systems , 1962 .

[2]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[3]  D Wyman,et al.  Small step tracking: implications for the oculomotor "dead zone". , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  Ronald A. Iiess.  Nonadjectival Rating Scales in Human Response Experiments , 1973 .

[5]  J. Stephens,et al.  The effect of visual feedback on physiological muscle tremor. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[7]  R J Jagacinski,et al.  Fitts' Law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  J. F. Stein,et al.  Role of the cerebellum in the visual guidance of movement , 1986, Nature.

[9]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Evidence for an error deadzone in compensatory tracking. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual pathways to perception and action. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[13]  M. Goodale,et al.  Chapter 28 Visual pathways to perception and action , 1993 .

[14]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Information, coordination modes and control in a prehensile force task , 1994 .

[15]  L Glass,et al.  Effect of manipulating visual feedback parameters on eye and finger movements. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[16]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  H Mushiake,et al.  Pallidal neuron activity during sequential arm movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Paul B. Johnson,et al.  The sources of visual information to the primate frontal lobe: a novel role for the superior parietal lobule. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  A Comparison of Two Control-Display Gain Measures for Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[20]  T. Ebner,et al.  What features of visually guided arm movements are encoded in the simple spike discharge of cerebellar Purkinje cells? , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[21]  W. Gogel,et al.  Measures of perceived linear size, sagittal motion, and visual angle from optical expansions and contractions , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Activation of visuomotor systems during visually guided movements: a functional MRI study. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[23]  K. Newell,et al.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Amplitude changes in the 8–12, 20–25, and 40 Hz oscillations in finger tremor , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  K. Newell,et al.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Enoka,et al.  Steadiness is reduced and motor unit discharge is more variable in old adults , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[27]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Sillito,et al.  Spatial organization and magnitude of orientation contrast interactions in primate V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  John M. Flach,et al.  Control Theory for Humans: Quantitative Approaches To Modeling Performance , 2002 .

[30]  K. Newell,et al.  Time-dependent structure in the discharge rate of human motor units , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  John M. Allman,et al.  The Effect of Gaze Angle and Fixation Distance on the Responses of Neurons in V1, V2, and V4 , 2002, Neuron.

[32]  D. Vaillancourt,et al.  Neural Basis for the Processes That Underlie Visually-guided and Internally-guided Force Control in Humans , 2003 .

[33]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Aging and the time and frequency structure of force output variability. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[34]  P Rougier,et al.  Modifying the gain of the visual feedback affects undisturbed upright stance control. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  Mary A. Mayka,et al.  Intermittent visuomotor processing in the human cerebellum, parietal cortex, and premotor cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.