Prasugrel development – Claims and achievements

Summary The priority task to develop better and safer antiplatelet agents is difficult to overestimate. In fact, oral antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin in ISIS-2 study, and clopidogrel in COMMIT mega trial in moderate doses are among the very few classes of drugs, which lead to the absolute mortality reduction benefit in patients after acute vascular thrombotic events. Prasugrel is an experimental thienopyridine, and irreversible antagonist of ADP P2Y12 receptor leading to inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. The recent TRITON trial, assessing head-to-head prasugrel versus standard of care clopidogrel, both on top of aspirin, reveals numerous controversies with regard to the trial design, definition of events, interpretation of the results, and suitability of the high maintenance prasugrel dose for chronic preventive human use. We critically review various aspects of prasugrel development, focusing on the discrepancies between claims and achievements. We conclude that the benefits of prasugrel are overestimated, and the risks, especially during chronic use are underestimated. Very careful maintenance-dose selection with the main focus on long-term safety profile for the new agents will become a key to success for the future oral antiplatelet drug development.

[1]  Stacy L. Haber,et al.  Prasugrel: a novel antiplatelet agent. , 2008, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[2]  E. Antman,et al.  Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  V. Serebruany Excess rates of nonfatal myocardial infarction in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel (preventing clinical events or chasing enzymatic ghosts?). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  E. Antman,et al.  A perspective on the efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  V. Serebruany Bleeding Risks with Prasugrel in the TRITON Trial: Good News ... Bad News , 2008, Cardiology.

[6]  M. Keltai,et al.  Intensive oral antiplatelet therapy for reduction of ischaemic events including stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a subanalysis of a randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[7]  K. Winters,et al.  Effects of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Lansoprazole on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Prasugrel and Clopidogrel , 2008, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Prasugrel achieves greater and faster P2Y12receptor-mediated platelet inhibition than clopidogrel due to more efficient generation of its active metabolite in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease. , 2007, European heart journal.

[9]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel Compared With High Loading– and Maintenance–Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  J. Ware,et al.  Antithrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management: one-year results from the ACUITY trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[11]  S. Iturria,et al.  Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not prasugrel , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[12]  D. Morrow,et al.  Pharmacoinvasive management of acute coronary syndrome: incorporating the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines: the CATH (cardiac catheterization and antithrombotic therapy in the hospital) Clinical Consensus Panel Report--III. , 2007, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[13]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  K. Winters,et al.  Increased Active Metabolite Formation Explains the Greater Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel Compared to High-dose Clopidogrel , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[15]  K. Winters,et al.  Greater Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation and Reduced Response Variability With Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel: An Integrated Analysis , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  V. Serebruany Aggressive antiplatelet strategies: time to reconsider? , 2007, European heart journal.

[17]  K. Winters,et al.  Comparison of speed of onset of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel versus prasugrel in healthy volunteers and correlation with responder status. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  K. Winters,et al.  A multiple dose study of prasugrel (CS-747), a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with clopidogrel in healthy humans. , 2007, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  D. Atar,et al.  Assessment of bleeding events in clinical trials--proposal of a new classification. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  R. Califf,et al.  Predictors of stroke within 30 days in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, European heart journal.

[21]  Adelaide,et al.  Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38). , 2006, American heart journal.

[23]  V. Serebruany Prasugrel, clopidogrel, and combining Swedish apples with American oranges. , 2006, European heart journal.

[24]  D. Lowry,et al.  Rebound platelet activation after termination of prasugrel and aspirin therapy due to confirmed non‐compliance in patient enrolled in the JUMBO Trial , 2006, International journal of clinical practice.

[25]  D. Lowry,et al.  Platelet inhibition with prasugrel (CS-747) compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary stenting: the subset from the JUMBO study , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[26]  A. Algra,et al.  Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[27]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2006, European heart journal.

[28]  M. Cattaneo P2Y12 receptor antagonists: a rapidly expanding group of antiplatelet agents. , 2006, European heart journal.

[29]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Risk factors for stroke after acute coronary syndromes in the Orbofiban in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes--Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (OPUS-TIMI) 16 study. , 2006, American heart journal.

[30]  R. Collins,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[31]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Effects of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Combination Versus Aspirin Alone on Platelet Activation and Major Receptor Expression in Patients After Recent Ischemic Stroke: For the Plavix Use for Treatment of Stroke (PLUTO-Stroke) Trial , 2005, Stroke.

[32]  J. Hallas,et al.  The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is not attenuated by statin treatment in stable patients with ischemic heart disease , 2005, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[33]  H. White,et al.  Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale. , 2004, American heart journal.

[34]  H. Diener,et al.  Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[35]  D. Atar,et al.  Noncompliance in antiplatelet trials: the AGATE trial perspective. , 2004, Stroke.

[36]  Thomas Weber,et al.  Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  C. O'connor,et al.  Effects of roxifiban on platelet aggregation and major receptor expression in patients with coronary artery disease for the Roxifiban Oral Compound Kinetics Evaluation Trial-I (ROCKET-I Platelet Substudy). , 2003, American heart journal.

[38]  E. Topol,et al.  Risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors. , 2001, JAMA.

[39]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Increased Mortality With Oral Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis of Phase III Multicenter Randomized Trials , 2001, Circulation.

[40]  A. Skene,et al.  Oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with orbofiban in patients with unstable coronary syndromes (OPUS-TIMI 16) trial. , 2000, Circulation.

[41]  E. Topol,et al.  Heterogeneity of platelet aggregation and major surface receptor expression in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, American heart journal.

[42]  C. Forbes,et al.  EUROPEAN STROKE PREVENTION STUDY 2: DIPYRIDAMOLE AND ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID IN THE SECONDARY PREVENTION OF STROKE , 1997, International journal of clinical practice.

[43]  M. Dennis A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee , 1996 .

[44]  Sarah Parish,et al.  Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  M. Cowan,et al.  American Heart Association. , 2018, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.