Identification and classification of high risk groups for Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis using an artificial neural network based on occupational histories: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCoal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP) is a preventable, but not fully curable occupational lung disease. More and more coal miners are likely to be at risk of developing CWP owing to an increase in coal production and utilization, especially in developing countries. Coal miners with different occupational categories and durations of dust exposure may be at different levels of risk for CWP. It is necessary to identify and classify different levels of risk for CWP in coal miners with different work histories. In this way, we can recommend different intervals for medical examinations according to different levels of risk for CWP. Our findings may provide a basis for further emending the measures of CWP prevention and control.MethodsThe study was performed using longitudinal retrospective data in the Tiefa Colliery in China. A three-layer artificial neural network with 6 input variables, 15 neurons in the hidden layer, and 1 output neuron was developed in conjunction with coal miners' occupational exposure data. Sensitivity and ROC analyses were adapted to explain the importance of input variables and the performance of the neural network. The occupational characteristics and the probability values predicted were used to categorize coal miners for their levels of risk for CWP.ResultsThe sensitivity analysis showed that influence of the duration of dust exposure and occupational category on CWP was 65% and 67%, respectively. The area under the ROC in 3 sets was 0.981, 0.969, and 0.992. There were 7959 coal miners with a probability value < 0.001. The average duration of dust exposure was 15.35 years. The average duration of ex-dust exposure was 0.69 years. Of the coal miners, 79.27% worked in helping and mining. Most of the coal miners were born after 1950 and were first exposed to dust after 1970. One hundred forty-four coal miners had a probability value ≥0.1. The average durations of dust exposure and ex-dust exposure were 25.70 and 16.30 years, respectively. Most of the coal miners were born before 1950 and began to be exposed to dust before 1980. Of the coal miners, 90.28% worked in tunneling.ConclusionThe duration of dust exposure and occupational category were the two most important factors for CWP. Coal miners at different levels of risk for CWP could be classified by the three-layer neural network analysis based on occupational history.

[1]  Sen-lin Liu,et al.  THE ESTIMATION OF THE NUMBER OF UNDERGROUND COAL MINERS AND THE ANNUAL DOSE TO COAL MINERS IN CHINA , 2007, Health physics.

[2]  Jeffery G Blodgett,et al.  A visual method for determining variable importance in an artificial neural network model: An empirical benchmark study , 2003 .

[3]  C. Bridges,et al.  Advanced cases of coal workers' pneumoconiosis--two counties, Virginia, 2006. , 2006, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[4]  M D Attfield,et al.  An investigation into the relationship between coal workers' pneumoconiosis and dust exposure in U.S. coal miners. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  R. Reger,et al.  Occupational safety and health implications of increased coal utilization. , 1979, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  W Karwowski,et al.  A neural network-based system for classification of industrial jobs with respect to risk of low back disorders due to workplace design. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  L. C. Kenny,et al.  Estimation of the Risk of Contracting Pneumoconiosis in the UK Coal Mining Industry , 2002 .

[8]  Michael Green,et al.  Comparison between neural networks and multiple logistic regression to predict acute coronary syndrome in the emergency room , 2006, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  D. Heederik,et al.  Characterization of dust exposure for the study of chronic occupational lung disease: a comparison of different exposure assessment strategies. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  M D Attfield,et al.  Prevalence of pneumoconiosis and its relationship to dust exposure in a cohort of U.S. bituminous coal miners and ex-miners. , 2013, American journal of industrial medicine.

[11]  P. Kinnear The politics of coal dust: industrial campaigns for the regulation of dust disease in Australian coal mining, 1939-49. , 2001, Labour history.

[12]  Farid E Ahmed,et al.  Molecular Cancer BioMed Central Review , 2005 .

[13]  Jouko Lampinen,et al.  Bayesian approach for neural networks--review and case studies , 2001, Neural Networks.

[14]  M D Attfield,et al.  Rapidly progressive coal workers’ pneumoconiosis in the United States: geographic clustering and other factors , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[15]  Da‐hong Wang,et al.  The current state of workers' pneumoconiosis in relationship to dusty working environments in Okayama Prefecture, Japan. , 2002, Acta medica Okayama.

[16]  B. Moen,et al.  High prevalence of respiratory symptoms among workers in the development section of a manually operated coal mine in a developing country: A cross sectional study , 2007, BMC public health.

[17]  D. F. Scott,et al.  Disease and Illness in U.S. Mining, 1983–2001 , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[18]  K. Lebecki,et al.  Occurrence and prevention of coal miners' pneumoconiosis in Poland. , 1999, American journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  이수정 해외산업간호정보 - 미국 산업안전보건연구원(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 소개 , 2009 .

[20]  D. Giannella‐Neto,et al.  PTTG expression in different experimental and human prolactinomas in relation to dopaminergic control of lactotropes , 2007, Molecular Cancer.

[21]  M. Attfield,et al.  Surveillance data on US coal miners' pneumoconiosis, 1970 to 1986. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[22]  J. Murray,et al.  Respiratory outcomes among South African coal miners at autopsy. , 2005, American journal of industrial medicine.

[23]  K. Moons,et al.  A simple diagnostic model for ruling out pneumoconiosis among construction workers , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[24]  Lin Fritschi,et al.  Artificial neural networks and job-specific modules to assess occupational exposure. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[25]  D. Linkens,et al.  Application of artificial intelligence to the management of urological cancer. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[26]  J. Weeks The Mine Safety and Health Administration's criterion threshold value policy increases miners' risk of pneumoconiosis. , 2006, American journal of industrial medicine.

[27]  Xin-Qiu Yao,et al.  A dynamic Bayesian network approach to protein secondary structure prediction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[28]  MD EL Petsonk,et al.  Pneumoconiosis prevalence among working coal miners examined in federal chest radiograph surveillance programs--United States, 1996-2002. , 2003, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[29]  V. Castranova,et al.  Silicosis and coal workers' pneumoconiosis. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  Parobeck Effect of the 2.0 mg/m3 coal mine dust standard on underground environmental dust levels. , 1975, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[31]  W. Baxt Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine , 1995, The Lancet.

[32]  M. Onder,et al.  Evaluation of occupational exposures to respirable dust in underground coal mines. , 2009, Industrial health.