Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND To assess potentially elevated cardiovascular risk related to new antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes, regulatory agencies require a comprehensive evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of new antidiabetic therapies. We assessed cardiovascular outcomes with alogliptin, a new inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), as compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes who had had a recent acute coronary syndrome. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina requiring hospitalization within the previous 15 to 90 days to receive alogliptin or placebo in addition to existing antihyperglycemic and cardiovascular drug therapy. The study design was a double-blind, noninferiority trial with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.3 for the hazard ratio for the primary end point of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. RESULTS A total of 5380 patients underwent randomization and were followed for up to 40 months (median, 18 months). A primary end-point event occurred in 305 patients assigned to alogliptin (11.3%) and in 316 patients assigned to placebo (11.8%) (hazard ratio, 0.96; upper boundary of the one-sided repeated confidence interval, 1.16; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Glycated hemoglobin levels were significantly lower with alogliptin than with placebo (mean difference, -0.36 percentage points; P<0.001). Incidences of hypoglycemia, cancer, pancreatitis, and initiation of dialysis were similar with alogliptin and placebo. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with type 2 diabetes who had had a recent acute coronary syndrome, the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were not increased with the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin as compared with placebo. (Funded by Takeda Development Center Americas; EXAMINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00968708.).

[1]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Interim analyses: the repeated confidence interval approach , 1989 .

[2]  J. Nunnelee Review of an article: The ADVANCE Collaborative Group. (2008). Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. NEJM 2008;358:2560-2572. , 2008 .

[3]  A. Goldfine Assessing the cardiovascular safety of diabetes therapies. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Diederick Grobbee,et al.  Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Monami,et al.  Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2011, Current medical research and opinion.

[6]  Robert A Greevy,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Sulfonylurea and Metformin Monotherapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  E. Lonn,et al.  Diabetes clinical trials: helped or hindered by the current shift in regulatory requirements? , 2012, European heart journal.

[8]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  The design and rationale of the saxagliptin assessment of vascular outcomes recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) 53 study. , 2011, American heart journal.

[9]  J. Holst,et al.  Inhibition of the activity of dipeptidyl-peptidase IV as a treatment for type 2 diabetes. , 1998, Diabetes.

[10]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[11]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes , 2011 .

[13]  S. Schinner,et al.  Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[14]  W. White,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of the dipetidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor alogliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2013, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[15]  J. Meigs Epidemiology of cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2003, Acta Diabetologica.

[16]  D. Drucker,et al.  Cardiovascular biology of the incretin system. , 2012, Endocrine reviews.

[17]  D. Patel,et al.  Alogliptin: a novel molecule for improving glycemic control in type II diabetes mellitus. , 2010, Current diabetes reviews.

[18]  M. Monami,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2013, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[19]  G. Paolisso,et al.  New Approaches to Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly , 2008, Drugs & aging.

[20]  S. Nissen,et al.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[22]  S. Inzucchi,et al.  Cardiovascular effects of the DPP-4 inhibitors , 2012, Diabetes & vascular disease research.