Multi-objective conceptual design: an approach to make cost-efficient the design for manufacturing and assembly in the development of complex products

Conceptual design is a central phase for the generation of the best product configurations. The design freedom suggests optimal solutions in terms of assembly, manufacturing, cost and material selection but a guided decision making approach based on multi-objective criteria is missing. The goal of this approach is to define a framework and a detailed approach for the definition of feasible design options and for the selection of the best one considering the combination of several production constrains and attributes. The approach is grounded on the concept of functional basis and the module heuristics used for the definition of product modules and the theory of Multi Criteria Decision Making approach (MCDM) for a mathematical assessment of the best design option. A complex product (tool-holder carousel of a machine tool) is used as a case study to validate the approach. Product modules have been re-designed and prototyped to efficiently assess the gain in terms of assembly time, manufacturability and costs.

[1]  Johan Ölvander,et al.  A computerized optimization framework for the morphological matrix applied to aircraft conceptual design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[3]  Essam Shehab,et al.  Manufacturing cost modelling for concurrent product development , 2001 .

[4]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[5]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  Memic: An Interactive Morphological Matrix Tool for Automated Concept Generation , 2008 .

[6]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  DFQM - an approach for improving the quality of assembled products , 2000 .

[7]  K. Narayana Rao,et al.  Multi-objective optimization approach for cost management during product design at the conceptual phase , 2014 .

[8]  George Q. Huang.  Design for X , 1996 .

[9]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[10]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  Modular product architecture , 2001 .

[11]  Guo Q. Huang,et al.  Design for X : concurrent engineering imperatives , 1996 .

[12]  C. D. Naiju,et al.  Early Cost Estimate of Product during Design Stage Using Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) Principles , 2012 .

[13]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Design-specific approach to design for assembly (DFA) for complex mechanical assemblies , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  Wankhade Nitesh Prakash,et al.  NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT BY DFMA AND RAPID PROTOTYPING , 2014 .

[16]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[17]  M. S. Parvez,et al.  Integrated manufacturing features and Design-for-manufacture guidelines for reducing product cost under CAD/CAM environment , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Michele Germani,et al.  A method to optimize assemblability of industrial product in early design phase: from product architecture to assembly sequence , 2012 .

[19]  H. ElMaraghy,et al.  A model for measuring products assembly complexity , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[20]  Bimal Nepal,et al.  PRODUCT MODULARIZATION CONSIDERING COST AND MANUFACTURABILITY OF MODULES , 2008 .

[21]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.