Leadership and Information Processing

There is a large body of research showing that people selectively prefer information that supports their decisions and opinions, and avoid conflicting information (selective information processing). Three studies were conducted to examine how the different leadership styles of supervisors influence subordinates’ selective information processing (i.e., the evaluation, seeking, and conveying of information). Studies 1 and 2 indicate that students in the role of subordinates who were exposed to transformational supervisors process information in a more balanced way than do those who were led by a transactional supervisor. Study 3 was carried out with professionals and showed that transformational leadership was negatively correlated with selective information seeking and conveying. This finding was mediated by the experience of positive emotions. Transactional leadership, by contrast, was not significantly associated with selective information processing. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  J. Bono,et al.  Workplace emotions: the role of supervision and leadership. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  P. Fischer,et al.  Selective exposure: the impact of collectivism and individualism. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al.  Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. , 1997 .

[4]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[5]  Margaret C. McKee,et al.  Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: the mediating role of meaningful work. , 2007, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[6]  D. Frey,et al.  The Influence of Mood on the Search for Supporting Versus Conflicting Information: Dissonance Reduction as a Means of Mood Regulation? , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Multiple Levels of Analysis , 1990 .

[8]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Peter Fischer,et al.  Self-regulation and selective exposure: the impact of depleted self-regulation resources on confirmatory information processing. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Information sampling and group decision making: the effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[11]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Leadership and Information Processing , 2019, Leader Thinking Skills.

[12]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[13]  The effects of social exclusion on confirmatory information processing , 2012 .

[14]  Peter Fischer,et al.  A New Look at Selective-Exposure Effects , 2010 .

[15]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  B. Bass,et al.  Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. , 1995 .

[17]  P. Fischer,et al.  Biased assimilation: the role of source position , 2009 .

[18]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[19]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  R. Comer,et al.  Induced-compliance attitude change: Once more with feeling , 1979 .

[21]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information , 1985 .

[22]  Matthew J. Lindberg,et al.  Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions , 2003 .

[24]  D. Frey,et al.  Information search and presentation in advisor-client interactions , 2003 .

[25]  B. Bass,et al.  Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership , 1999 .

[26]  B. Bass,et al.  Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. , 1988 .

[27]  B. Fredrickson.  The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  E. Fodor,et al.  Charismatic and noncharismatic leaders: Differences in behavior and effectiveness. , 1988 .

[29]  B. Bass.  From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. , 1990 .

[30]  A. Isen,et al.  POSITIVE AFFECT, SYSTEMATIC COGNITIVE PROCESSING, AND BEHAVIOR: TOWARD INTEGRATION OF AFFECT, COGNITION, AND MOTIVATION , 2003 .

[31]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[32]  P. Fischer,et al.  Selective exposure: The impact of framing information search instructions as gains and losses , 2009 .

[33]  P. Fischer,et al.  Selective exposure among advisors: the impact of impression motivation , 2013 .

[34]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[35]  Anne Nederveen Pieterse,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior : The moderating role of psychological empowerment , 2009 .