The use of electronic voting and peer assessment to encourage the development of higher order thinking skills in learners

In the research reported here, electronic voting and peer assessment were used with 215 first year computer science and information technology undergraduates undertaking an electronic media design module. In previous years it proved difficult for learners following this module to develop good quality practical skills resulting in poor results in practical tests. In this study, the module delivery team used electronic voting and a form of peer assessment in order to motivate learners and to engage them more deeply in learning. It was hypothesised that this would improve higher order thinking skills and lead to improved performance in practical work. A significant improvement in performance of 6% was achieved (p<0.001) as compared to previous years. We were able to show that the most likely reason for this was the use of electronic voting systems and peer assessment. In the concluding section of the paper we discuss some issues related to this finding and our teaching approach.

[1]  L. Li,et al.  Some Refinements on Peer Assessment of Group Projects , 2001 .

[2]  Anne Venables,et al.  Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment , 2003 .

[3]  L. Stefani.  Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities , 1994 .

[4]  N. Falchikov,et al.  Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks , 2000 .

[5]  C. Reich.  Peer assessment. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[6]  Phil Davies,et al.  Computerized Peer Assessment , 2000 .

[7]  Zsófia Osváth,et al.  DOI: 10 , 2011 .

[8]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment , 2006 .

[9]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[10]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[11]  Mark Russell.  Using an electronic voting system to enhance learning and teaching , 2008 .

[12]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions , 2010 .

[13]  Denise Whitelock,et al.  Developing a roadmap for e-assessment: which way now? , 2006 .

[14]  I. E. Hughes,et al.  Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills , 1993 .

[15]  A. Cooper,et al.  Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development , 2002 .

[16]  K. Topping.  Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[17]  Trevor Barker,et al.  Marking complex assignments using peer assessment with an electronic voting system and an automated feedback tool , 2011 .

[18]  V. Simpson,et al.  Using Electronic Voting Systems in Lectures , 2005 .

[19]  Stephen W. Draper,et al.  Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..