Embracing the complexity of genomic data for personalized medicine.

Numerous recent studies have demonstrated the use of genomic data, particularly gene expression signatures, as clinical prognostic factors in cancer and other complex diseases. Such studies herald the future of genomic medicine and the opportunity for personalized prognosis in a variety of clinical contexts that utilizes genome-scale molecular information. The scale, complexity, and information content of high-throughput gene expression data, as one example of complex genomic information, is often under-appreciated as many analyses continue to focus on defining individual rather than multiplex biomarkers for patient stratification. Indeed, this complexity of genomic data is often--rather paradoxically--viewed as a barrier to its utility. To the contrary, the complexity and scale of global genomic data, as representing the many dimensions of biology, must be embraced for the development of more precise clinical prognostics. The need is for integrated analyses--approaches that embrace the complexity of genomic data, including multiple forms of genomic data, and aim to explore and understand multiple, interacting, and potentially conflicting predictors of risk, rather than continuing on the current and traditional path that oversimplifies and ignores the information content in the complexity. All forms of potentially relevant data should be examined, with particular emphasis on understanding the interactions, complementarities, and possible conflicts among gene expression, genetic, and clinical markers of risk.

[1]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[2]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. , 1999, Science.

[3]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[6]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Transcriptional profiling of a mouse model for Rett syndrome reveals subtle transcriptional changes in the brain , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Golub,et al.  DNA microarrays in clinical oncology. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  M. West,et al.  Distinct gene expression phenotypes of cells lacking Rb and Rb family members. , 2003, Cancer research.

[9]  M. Daly,et al.  PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[10]  M. Sarwal,et al.  Molecular heterogeneity in acute renal allograft rejection identified by DNA microarray profiling. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  L. Staudt Molecular diagnosis of the hematologic cancers. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  M. West,et al.  Gene expression phenotypic models that predict the activity of oncogenic pathways , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Holly Dressman,et al.  Towards integrated clinico-genomic models for personalized medicine: combining gene expression signatures and clinical factors in breast cancer outcomes prediction. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[14]  Bill C. White,et al.  Proteomic patterns of tumour subsets in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2003, The Lancet.

[15]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Gene Expression Signature of Fibroblast Serum Response Predicts Human Cancer Progression: Similarities between Tumors and Wounds , 2004, PLoS biology.

[16]  M. West,et al.  Gene Expression Phenotypes of Atherosclerosis , 2004, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[17]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Will tomorrow's medicines work for everyone? , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[18]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Clinical Proteomics: From Biomarker Discovery and Cell Signaling Profiles to Individualized Personal Therapy , 2005, Bioscience reports.

[19]  T. Golub,et al.  Molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies robust subtypes including one characterized by host inflammatory response. , 2004, Blood.

[20]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Stephen H. Friend,et al.  How molecular profiling could revolutionize drug discovery , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[22]  J. Mesirov,et al.  An oncogenic KRAS2 expression signature identified by cross-species gene-expression analysis , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[23]  G. Getz,et al.  Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  Jeffrey T. Chang,et al.  Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies , 2006, Nature.