A threshold-based cloud mask for the high-resolution visible channel of Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI

Abstract. A threshold-based cloud mask for the high-resolution visible (HRV) channel (1 × 1 km2) of the Meteosat SEVIRI (Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager) instrument is introduced and evaluated. It is based on operational EUMETSAT cloud mask for the low-resolution channels of SEVIRI (3 × 3 km2), which is used for the selection of suitable thresholds to ensure consistency with its results. The aim of using the HRV channel is to resolve small-scale cloud structures that cannot be detected by the low-resolution channels. We find that it is of advantage to apply thresholds relative to clear-sky reflectance composites, and to adapt the threshold regionally. Furthermore, the accuracy of the different spectral channels for thresholding and the suitability of the HRV channel are investigated for cloud detection. The case studies show different situations to demonstrate the behavior for various surface and cloud conditions. Overall, between 4 and 24% of cloudy low-resolution SEVIRI pixels are found to contain broken clouds in our test data set depending on considered region. Most of these broken pixels are classified as cloudy by EUMETSAT's cloud mask, which will likely result in an overestimate if the mask is used as an estimate of cloud fraction. The HRV cloud mask aims for small-scale convective sub-pixel clouds that are missed by the EUMETSAT cloud mask. The major limit of the HRV cloud mask is the minimum cloud optical thickness (COT) that can be detected. This threshold COT was found to be about 0.8 over ocean and 2 over land and is highly related to the albedo of the underlying surface.

[1]  Larry Di Girolamo,et al.  Selection of the automated thresholding algorithm for the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer Radiometric Camera-by-Camera Cloud Mask over land , 2007 .

[2]  A. Lacis,et al.  Global, seasonal cloud variations from satellite radiance measurements. I: Sensitivity of analysis , 1989 .

[3]  B. Matthews.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Rob Roebeling,et al.  Cloud property retrievals for climate monitoring: Implications of differences between Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on METEOSAT‐8 and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on NOAA‐17 , 2006 .

[5]  A. Ipe,et al.  Pixel‐scale composite top‐of‐the‐atmosphere clear‐sky reflectances for Meteosat‐7 visible data , 2003 .

[6]  Karl-Göran Karlsson,et al.  NWCSAF AVHRR Cloud Detection and Analysis Using Dynamic Thresholds and Radiative Transfer Modeling. Part I: Algorithm Description , 2005 .

[7]  PHYSICAL, STATISTICAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR CLOUD IDENTIFICATION USING MSG-SEVIRI DATA , 2008 .

[8]  C. Bohren,et al.  An introduction to atmospheric radiation , 1981 .

[9]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Simulating Meteosat-7 broadband radiances using two visible channels of Meteosat-8 , 2006 .

[10]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[11]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Diurnal Variability of Regional Cloud and Clear-Sky Radiative Parameters Derived from GOES Data. Part III: November 1978 Radiative Parameters , 1984 .

[12]  Itamar M. Lensky,et al.  Clouds-Aerosols-Precipitation Satellite Analysis Tool (CAPSAT) , 2008 .

[13]  Rob Roebeling,et al.  Downscaling of METEOSAT SEVIRI 0.6 and 0.8 μm channel radiances utilizing the high-resolution visible channel , 2010 .

[14]  M. Derrien,et al.  The use of the high resolution visible in SAFNWC/MSG cloud mask , 2010 .

[15]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Outcome of the third cloud retrieval evaluation workshop , 2012 .

[16]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Diurnal Variability of Regional Cloud and Clear-Sky Radiative Parameters Derived from GOES Data. Part I: Analysis Method , 1984 .

[17]  Hartwig Deneke,et al.  Using MSG-SEVIRI Cloud Physical Properties and Weather Radar Observations for the Detection of Cb/TCu Clouds , 2011 .

[18]  J. Schmetz,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) , 2002 .

[19]  A. G. Driedonks.  Sensitivity analysis of the equations for a convective mixed layer , 1982 .

[20]  Observations of shallow convective clouds generated by solar heating of dark smoke plumes , 2008 .

[21]  R. Saunders,et al.  An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data , 1988 .

[22]  Richard A. Frey,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part I: Improvements in the MODIS Cloud Mask for Collection 5 , 2008 .

[23]  J. Hansen,et al.  A parameterization for the absorption of solar radiation in the earth's atmosphere , 1974 .

[24]  R. A. Roebeling,et al.  Validation of Cloud Liquid Water Path Retrievals from SEVIRI Using One Year of CloudNET Observations , 2008 .

[25]  Evaluation of the Daylight Cycle of Model-Predicted Cloud Amount and Condensed Water Path over Europe with Observations from MSG SEVIRI , 2009 .