The scenario‐based usability checklist development for home appliance design: A case study

In the past decade, home appliances have been rapidly developed to satisfy the various requirements of users. Thus, there are increases in requirements to explore appropriate evaluation methods that reflect the usability of home appliances quickly and comprehensively. This study aims to develop a scenario‐based usability checklist for product designers early in the design process. In this study, the scenario‐based usability checklist consists of two parts: 1) a heuristic evaluation checklist, and 2) a scenario evaluation checklist. In heuristic evaluation checklist development, usability factors of home appliances are extracted and then coupled to user interface (UI) elements. In scenario evaluation checklist development, scenarios are developed through brainstorming by focus group interview (FGI), and then evaluation elements are extracted from previous scenarios analysis. The proposed scenario‐based usability checklists can enable designers to evaluate product design quickly and comprehensively early in the development process with users' viewpoints. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  L. Vertelney,et al.  Using video to prototype user interfaces , 1989, SGCH.

[2]  Sung H. Han,et al.  A methodology for developing a usability index of consumer electronic products , 2008 .

[3]  Jiyoung Kwahk,et al.  A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Jonas Löwgren Animated use sketches as design representations , 2004 .

[5]  Min-Yuan Ma,et al.  A new user-centered design approach: a hair washing assistive device design for users with shoulder mobility restriction. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[7]  H. Rex Hartson,et al.  Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product & process , 1993 .

[8]  Ebba Þóra Hvannberg,et al.  Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[9]  Cheol Lee,et al.  An Evaluation Framework for the Design Concepts of Tangible Interface on New Collaborative Work Support System , 2007, HCI.

[10]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Symbiosis and synergy? scenarios, task analysis and reuse of HCI knowledge , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Usability of consumer electronic products , 2001 .

[12]  Hong Zhu,et al.  Software requirements validation via task analysis , 2002, J. Syst. Softw..

[13]  Eric Harslem,et al.  The star user interface: an overview , 1899, AFIPS '82.

[14]  Elizabeth J. Simeral,et al.  Comparative analysis of heuristic and usability evaluation methods , 1997 .

[15]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario , 1992, TOIS.

[16]  Connor Graham,et al.  A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods , 2003, Mobile HCI.

[17]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach , 1982 .

[18]  A M Wichansky,et al.  Usability testing in 2000 and beyond , 2000, Ergonomics.

[19]  Robert C. Williges,et al.  Criteria For Evaluating Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques , 1991, CHI.

[21]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .