Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.

INTRODUCTION Crash warning systems have been shown to provide safety benefits, but no studies have examined how teenagers respond. This study sought to find out whether young, inexperienced drivers change behavior in response to warnings. METHODS Forty 16-17 year-olds drove an instrumented vehicle equipped with a system that warned for lane departures and potential rear-end and lane change/merge crashes. Participants were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups, and their driving was monitored for 14weeks during 2011-12. For the experimental group, this included a treatment period, when crash alerts were received by drivers, and baseline and post-treatment periods, when warnings were recorded but not received. The control group never received warnings. Data were analyzed to determine whether warnings were associated with changes in driving behavior. RESULTS A total of 15,039 trips were analyzed. Lane drifts accounted for 73% of warnings. Forward collision warning rates doubled for all drivers during the treatment period and continued at an increased rate post-treatment. This was likely a result of the fact that, as time went on, all drivers spent more time following vehicles at close distances. Receiving alerts was associated with effects on following and lane-changing behavior, including more time spent following at close distances (17%), fewer lateral drifts (37%) and fewer unsignaled lane changes (80%). Receiving warnings wasn't associated with an increased likelihood of engaging in secondary tasks. CONCLUSIONS Warning systems may result in improved lane-keeping and turn-signal behaviors by novice drivers, but there is some indication they may result in more close-following behaviors. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS There is some evidence that lane departure warning may improve turn-signal use for young drivers. While there is no evidence of safety benefits from the other types of warnings, there is some evidence of an increase in close-following behavior but no increase in secondary tasks due to the presence of those capabilities.

[1]  E R Braver,et al.  Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[2]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Longitudinal Driving Behavior with Integrated Crash-Warning System , 2013 .

[3]  Dot Hs,et al.  Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test , 2002 .

[4]  J P Bliss,et al.  Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[5]  Jessica S Jermakian,et al.  Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Bevan B. Kirley,et al.  Crashes of novice teenage drivers: characteristics and contributing factors. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[7]  A F Williams,et al.  The effect of teenage passengers on the fatal crash risk of teenage drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  T. Dingus,et al.  Crash and risky driving involvement among novice adolescent drivers and their parents. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[9]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist. , 2016, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  T. Dingus,et al.  The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[12]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Heavy-Truck Drivers’ Following Behavior With Intervention of an Integrated, In-Vehicle Crash Warning System , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Keli A Braitman,et al.  Volvo and Infiniti Drivers’ Experiences With Select Crash Avoidance Technologies , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  Zaiyang Tang,et al.  System performance guidelines for a prototype integrated vehicle based safety system (IVBSS) – light vehicle platform , 2008 .

[15]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short- and Long-Term Driving Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Robert D Foss,et al.  Long-term effect of the North Carolina graduated driver licensing system on licensed driver crash incidence: a 5-year survival analysis. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  J. Andrey,et al.  The situational risks of young drivers: the influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated vehicle-based safety systems: light vehicle field operational test, key findings report. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Effects of in-vehicle monitoring on the driving behavior of teenagers. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[21]  Mariea C. Dunn,et al.  Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload , 2000, Ergonomics.

[22]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Teen Driver Risk in Relation to Age and Number of Passengers, United States, 2007–2010 , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Volvo Drivers’ Experiences With Advanced Crash Avoidance and Related Technologies , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[24]  C Y David Yang,et al.  Evaluation of a Road-Departure Crash Warning System , 2007 .