Bus-Holding Control Strategies

Transit operations involve several inherent sources of uncertainty, including dispatch time from the origin terminal, travel time between stops, and dwell time at stops. Bus-holding control strategies are a prominent method applied by transit operators to improve transit performance and level of service. The common practice is to regulate departures from a limited number of stops by holding buses until their scheduled departure time. An analysis of the performance of a high-frequency bus line in Stockholm, Sweden, based on automatic vehicle location data showed that this control strategy was not effective in improving service regularity along the line. The analysis also indicated that drivers adjusted their speed according to performance objectives. Implications of a control strategy that regulates departures from all stops on the basis of the headways of the preceding bus and the following bus were evaluated with BusMezzo, a transit operations simulation model. The results suggest that this strategy can improve service performance considerably from both passengers' and operator's perspectives. In addition, the strategy implies cooperative operations, as the decisions of each driver are interdependent with other drivers' decisions, and mutual corrections can be made. Difficulties in realizing the benefits of the proposed strategy in practice, such as dispatching from the origin terminal, driver scheduling, and compliance, are discussed. The implications of several practical considerations are assessed by conducting a sensitivity analysis as part of the preparations for a field experiment designed to test the proposed control strategy.

[1]  Peter G Furth,et al.  Data Analysis for Bus Planning and Monitoring , 2000 .

[2]  Mark D. Abkowitz,et al.  IMPLEMENTING HEADWAY-BASED RELIABILITY CONTROL ON TRANSIT ROUTES , 1990 .

[3]  Peter G Furth,et al.  Part 4: Capacity and Quality of Service: Service Reliability and Hidden Waiting Time: Insights from Automatic Vehicle Location Data , 2006 .

[4]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Mesoscopic Modeling of Bus Public Transportation , 2010 .

[5]  Niels van Oort,et al.  Reliability Improvement in Short Headway Transit Services , 2010 .

[6]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons , 2009 .

[7]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  REAL-TIME CONTROL OF BUSES FOR SCHEDULE COORDINATION AT A TERMINAL , 2003 .

[8]  S. C. Wirasinghe,et al.  A simulation model of reliable schedule design for a fixed transit route , 2001 .

[9]  Rabi G. Mishalani,et al.  Decision Factors in Service Control on High-Frequency Metro Line: Importance in Service Delivery , 2010 .

[10]  Niels van Oort,et al.  Control of Public Transportation Operations to Improve Reliability , 2009 .

[11]  Wilco Burghout,et al.  Hybrid microscopic-mesoscopic traffic simulation , 2004 .

[12]  J. Oosterhaven,et al.  Annual Report 2008 , 2009 .

[13]  Niels van Oort,et al.  Control of Public Transportation Operations to Improve Reliability: Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[14]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Impacts of Holding Control Strategies on Transit Performance , 2011 .

[15]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Bus Supervision Deployment Strategies and Use of Real-Time Automatic Vehicle Location for Improved Bus Service Reliability , 2008 .

[16]  Peter G Furth,et al.  Service Reliability and Hidden Waiting Time , 2006 .