Simulation of the effect of pruning and topping on cotton growth using COTTON2K model

Abstract COTTON2K, like most other cotton production models, does not always adequately represent local growth conditions owing to the fact that it fails to take into account some indigenous cultivation practices. For instance, pruning and topping, a common practice for cotton cultivation in China is not included in the model simulation of COTTON2K. The objective of this research therefore was to: (1) modify COTTON2K source code and slot pruning and topping simulation switch on to the model, and (2) calibrate and validate the modified COTTON2K model with field data from pruning and topping cultivation practice. First, field collected data in 2003 and 2004 were compared between the treatments, with and without pruning and topping, and the COTTON2K source code updated with the ‘pruning and topping’ switch. This was followed by the calibration and validation of the updated model with field data and simulation of the effect of pruning and topping on cotton performance. It was noted from field observations that pruning and topping reduced total fruit sites, but at the same time, increased retained boll number, possibly due to significant reductions in abscised fruit sites. Though total dry matter production dropped, more dry matter allocation to reproductive organs, however, enhanced higher cotton lint yield in the pruning and topping treatment. Results of the modified model simulation showed that growth in the number of main-stem node ceased after topping. Furthermore, there was more biomass allocation to reproductive organs, such as green and open bolls under pruning and topping. Coefficient of determination above 0.8 for most of the growth factors was obtained in the calibration and validation processes under pruning and topping, a strong indication of the level of success of the model modification.

[1]  M. Chetti,et al.  Effect of plant growth regulators on physiological components of yield in hybrid cotton , 2005 .

[2]  H. D. Bowen,et al.  Development of a Nitrogen Balance for Cotton Growth Models: A First Approximation1 , 1974 .

[3]  D. N. Baker,et al.  Temperature and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton canopy architecture , 1990 .

[4]  A. B. Hearn,et al.  OZCOT: A simulation model for cotton crop management , 1994 .

[5]  D. Kittock,et al.  Effects of Topping Pima Cotton on Lint Yield and Boll Retention1 , 1977 .

[6]  A. M. Stewart,et al.  Influence of Plant Density on Cotton Response to Mepiquat Chloride Application , 2006 .

[7]  W. Pettigrew Source-to-Sink Manipulation Effects on Cotton Lint Yield and Yield Components , 1994 .

[8]  B. Acock,et al.  Mepiquat Chloride and Irrigation versus Cotton Growth and Development , 1992 .

[9]  D. Wallach,et al.  Effects of fruiting form removal on cotton reproductive development , 1982 .

[10]  J. Jones,et al.  Chemical efficacy of early square removal and subsequent productivity of superokra-leaf cotton. , 1991 .

[11]  T. Kerby,et al.  Cotton Fruiting Modification with Mepiquat Chloride1 , 1986 .

[12]  B. D. Doss,et al.  Influence of Topping and Side Pruning on Cotton Yield and Other Characteristics1 , 1965 .

[13]  M. Obasi,et al.  Influence of Topping, Side Branch Pruning and Hill Spacing on Growth and Development of Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) in the Southern Guinea Savanna Location of Nigeria , 2005 .

[14]  D. N. Baker,et al.  Simulation of Growth and Yield in Cotton: I. Gross Photosynthesis, Respiration, and Growth 1 , 1972 .

[15]  C. J. Phene,et al.  Calgos, a version of gossym adapted for irrigated cotton. I. Drip irrigation, soil water transport and root growth , 1992 .

[16]  Bo-Ying Wang,et al.  Explicit Expressions of Smith's Determinant on a Poset , 2001 .