Conscientiousness and managerial performance

Recent research has provided clear evidence that personality factors are associated with job performance. The construct of conscientiousness has been shown to be a particularly promising predictor of overall job performance. Some authors have proposed that conscientiousness might be the ‘g’ of personality and predict performance in most occupational areas. The nature of the construct of conscientiousness is reviewed and consideration given to the likely behaviour associated with high conscientiousness. It is hypothesized that, given the requirements of managerial work, the criterion-related validity of conscientiousness may not extend to all managerial jobs. Conscientiousness scores are derived for a sample of managers (N= 437), with the aid of personality questionnaire data. In a concurrent validity design these scores are correlated with indicators of current job performance, promotability and specific job performance factors. The correlation of conscientiousness with current performance is close to zero and the correlation with promotability is -.20. The pattern of relationships between conscientiousness and the job performance factors is used to interpret the finding that conscientiousness is not influential in determining managerial performance. The results suggest that there may be limits to the range of occupational areas in which conscientiousness is closely linked with job performance.

[1]  P. Saville,et al.  The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality , 1991 .

[2]  Mary L. Tenopyr,et al.  Artifactual reliability of forced-choice scales. , 1988 .

[3]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  A note on the criterion. , 1963 .

[4]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  Personality and job competences: The criterion-related validity of some personality variables , 1993 .

[5]  L. Hough The 'Big Five' Personality Variables--Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction , 1992 .

[6]  Dave Bartram,et al.  The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality , 1996 .

[7]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Personality Measurement and Employment Decisions. Questions and Answers. , 1996 .

[8]  H. Sypher,et al.  SEEING OURSELVES AS OTHERS SEE US , 1984 .

[9]  A. Tellegen,et al.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Gill Nyfield,et al.  A Demonstration of the Validity of the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) in the Measurement of Job Competencies Across Time and in Separate Organisations , 1996 .

[11]  J. Loevinger Has Psychology Lost Its Conscience , 1994 .

[12]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  Predicting job performance: Not much more than g.. , 1994 .

[13]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[14]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  PERSONALITY AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A CRITIQUE OF THE TETT, JACKSON, AND ROTHSTEIN (1991) META-ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[15]  J. Hogan,et al.  Conscientiousness and integrity at work , 1997 .

[16]  R. R. Abidin Psychological Assessment Resources , 1995 .

[17]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .

[18]  J. Salgado The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[20]  Steve Blinkhorn,et al.  Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests , 1988 .

[21]  Helen Baron,et al.  Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement , 1996 .

[22]  L. E. Hicks,et al.  Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. , 1970 .

[23]  J. Block A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .