The emerging patterns of power in corporate governance – Back to the future in improving corporate decision making

Social institutions are experiencing change in their patterns of power as they are re‐aligned to an increasingly complex world and the onset of the new information economy. Attention has been drawn particularly to the need to improve corporate governance as a means to enhance corporate accountability and improve corporate performance. This paper consequently explores the distribution of corporate power and the processes that can foster higher quality decision making and actions by boards. The paper investigates the fundamental difference between the exercise of leadership, management and political power within an organization and, particularly, the responsibility and power relationships between an organization and its board. The authors assert that if the patterns of power are well understood then some things can be said about the patterns that are likely to emerge and what structures might be more effective than others. The paper concludes by arguing that the manner and style of corporate governance could benefit from some further refinement.

[1]  Arie de Geus,et al.  The Living Company: Growth, Learning and Longevity in Business , 1997 .

[2]  D. Leighton,et al.  Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries , 1996 .

[3]  A. Kouzmin,et al.  Economic rationalism, risk and institutional vulnerability , 1996 .

[4]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective. , 1978 .

[5]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[6]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 2008 .

[7]  A. Kouzmin,et al.  From Chaos To Patterns Of Understanding: Reflections On The Dynamics Of Effective Government Decision Making , 1999 .

[8]  L. Donaldson,et al.  Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach , 1998 .

[9]  W. Nord.  Managing with power , 1997 .

[10]  P. Senge,et al.  Synchronicity: The Inner Path of Leadership , 1996 .

[11]  John Micklethwait,et al.  The Witch Doctors: Making Sense of the Management Gurus , 1996 .

[12]  Peter Breiner.  Max Weber and Democratic Politics , 1996 .

[13]  Henry Bosch,et al.  The Director at Risk; Accountability in the Boardroom , 1995 .

[14]  F. Fukuyama.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity Penguin London , 1995 .

[15]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1992 .

[16]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[17]  S. Hekman,et al.  Weber, the ideal type, and contemporary social theory , 1983 .

[18]  Alexander L. George,et al.  Presidential Decisionmaking In Foreign Policy: The Effective Use Of Information And Advice , 1980 .

[19]  M. Richter,et al.  The political theory of Montesquieu , 1977 .

[20]  M. Weber,et al.  Basic Concepts in Sociology , 1976 .

[21]  Walter Odajnyk.  Jung and politics , 1976 .

[22]  G. Vickers,et al.  The art of judgment , 1965 .

[23]  R. M. Hutchins,et al.  The Six Enneads , 1956 .

[24]  W. Otto,et al.  The Homeric Gods , 1929 .

[25]  The Escalation of Commitment , 2022 .