IGS reference frames: status and future improvements

The hierarchy of reference frames used in the International GPS Service (IGS) and the procedures and rationale for realizing them are reviewed. The Conventions of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) lag developments in the IGS in a number of important respects. Recommendations are offered for changes in the IERS Conventions to recognize geocenter motion (as already implemented by the IGS) and to enforce greater model consistency in order to achieve higher precision for combined reference frame products. Despite large improvements in the internal consistency of IGS product sets, defects remain which should be addressed in future developments. If the IGS is to remain a leader in this area, then a comprehensive, long-range strategy should be formulated and pursued to maintain and enhance the IGS reference frame, as well as to improve its delivery to users. Actions should include the official designation of a high-performance reference tracking network whose stations are expected to meet the highest standards possible.

[1]  M. Rothacher,et al.  Estimation of elevation-dependent satellite antenna phase center variations of GPS satellites , 2003 .

[2]  R. D. Ray,et al.  Diurnal and Semidiurnal Variations in the Earth's Rotation Rate Induced by Oceanic Tides , 1994, Science.

[3]  J. Ray.  Reinforcing and Securing the IGS Reference Tracking Network , 2003 .

[4]  N. Gillett,et al.  How linear is the Arctic Oscillation response to greenhouse gases , 2002 .

[5]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications , 2002 .

[6]  T. P. Yunck,et al.  Origin of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame , 2003 .

[7]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity , 2002 .

[8]  M. M. Watkins,et al.  IGS REFERENCE FRAME REALIZATION , 1998 .

[9]  J. Kouba.  A GUIDE TO USING INTERNATIONAL GNSS SERVICE (IGS) PRODUCTS , 2003 .

[10]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[11]  Richard D. Ray,et al.  Atmospheric pressure corrections in geodesy and oceanography: A strategy for handling air tides , 2002 .

[12]  M. Watkins,et al.  Observations of tidally coherent diurnal and semidiurnal variations in the geocenter , 1997 .

[13]  Anny Cazenave,et al.  Geocentre motion from the DORIS space system and laser data to the Lageos satellites: comparison with surface loading data , 2000 .

[14]  Ch. Reigber,et al.  Satellite antenna phase center offsets and scale errors in GPS solutions , 2003 .

[15]  Pascal Willis,et al.  Terrestrial reference frame requirements within GGOS perspective , 2005 .

[16]  Gerard Petit,et al.  IERS Conventions (2003) , 2004 .

[17]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Site distribution and aliasing effects in the inversion for load coefficients and geocenter motion from GPS data , 2002 .

[18]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  Estimation of nutation using the Global Positioning System , 1999 .

[19]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Large‐scale global surface mass variations inferred from GPS measurements of load‐induced deformation , 2003 .

[20]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[21]  Tilo Schöne,et al.  IGS Reference Frame Maintenance , 2005 .

[22]  G. Blewitt,et al.  A New Global Mode of Earth Deformation: Seasonal Cycle Detected , 2001, Science.

[23]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  The impact of a No‐Net‐Rotation Condition on ITRF2000 , 2003 .

[24]  Pascal Gegout,et al.  GGFC Special Bureau for Loading: current status and plans , 2003 .

[25]  Tim Springer,et al.  New IGS Station and Satellite Clock Combination , 2001, GPS Solutions.

[26]  Mike P. Stewart,et al.  Aliased tidal signatures in continuous GPS height time series , 2003 .

[27]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions , 2003 .