The representation of solar cycle signals in stratospheric ozone – Part 2: Analysis of global models

Abstract. The impact of changes in incoming solar irradiance on stratospheric ozone abundances should be included in climate simulations to aid in capturing the atmospheric response to solar cycle variability. This study presents the first systematic comparison of the representation of the 11-year solar cycle ozone response (SOR) in chemistry–climate models (CCMs) and in pre-calculated ozone databases specified in climate models that do not include chemistry, with a special focus on comparing the recommended protocols for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 (CMIP5 and CMIP6). We analyse the SOR in eight CCMs from the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI-1) and compare these with results from three ozone databases for climate models: the Bodeker Scientific ozone database, the SPARC/Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate (AC&C) ozone database for CMIP5 and the SPARC/CCMI ozone database for CMIP6. The peak amplitude of the annual mean SOR in the tropical upper stratosphere (1–5 hPa) decreases by more than a factor of 2, from around 5 to 2 %, between the CMIP5 and CMIP6 ozone databases. This substantial decrease can be traced to the CMIP5 ozone database being constructed from a regression model fit to satellite and ozonesonde measurements, while the CMIP6 database is constructed from CCM simulations. The SOR in the CMIP6 ozone database therefore implicitly resembles the SOR in the CCMI-1 models. The structure in latitude of the SOR in the CMIP6 ozone database and CCMI-1 models is considerably smoother than in the CMIP5 database, which shows unrealistic sharp gradients in the SOR across the middle latitudes owing to the paucity of long-term ozone measurements in polar regions. The SORs in the CMIP6 ozone database and the CCMI-1 models show a seasonal dependence with enhanced meridional gradients at mid- to high latitudes in the winter hemisphere. The CMIP5 ozone database does not account for seasonal variations in the SOR, which is unrealistic. Sensitivity experiments with a global atmospheric model without chemistry (ECHAM6.3) are performed to assess the atmospheric impacts of changes in the representation of the SOR and solar spectral irradiance (SSI) forcing between CMIP5 and CMIP6. The larger amplitude of the SOR in the CMIP5 ozone database compared to CMIP6 causes a likely overestimation of the modelled tropical stratospheric temperature response between 11-year solar cycle minimum and maximum by up to 0.55 K, or around 80 % of the total amplitude. This effect is substantially larger than the change in temperature response due to differences in SSI forcing between CMIP5 and CMIP6. The results emphasize the importance of adequately representing the SOR in global models to capture the impact of the 11-year solar cycle on the atmosphere. Since a number of limitations in the representation of the SOR in the CMIP5 ozone database have been identified, we recommend that CMIP6 models without chemistry use the CMIP6 ozone database and the CMIP6 SSI dataset to better capture the climate impacts of solar variability. The SOR coefficients from the CMIP6 ozone database are published with this paper.

[1]  Michaela I. Hegglin,et al.  Historical Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone Radiative Forcing Using the CMIP6 Database , 2018 .

[2]  A. Maycock.  11 year solar cycle ozone coefficients from CMIP6 ozone dataset presented in ‘The representation of solar cycle signals in stratospheric ozone. Part II: Analysis of global models' , 2018 .

[3]  Paul Charbonneau,et al.  Solar Forcing for CMIP6 (v3.1) , 2016 .

[4]  Andrea Stenke,et al.  Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2017 .

[5]  Eduardo Zorita,et al.  The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 3: the Last Millennium, Scientific Objective and Experimental Design for the PMIP4 past1000 simulations , 2016 .

[6]  A. Maycock,et al.  The representation of solar cycle signals in stratospheric ozone – Part 1: A comparison of recently updated satellite observations , 2016 .

[7]  S. Dhomse,et al.  On the ambiguous nature of the 11 year solar cycle signal in upper stratospheric ozone , 2016 .

[8]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Evaluation of simulated photolysis rates and their response to solar irradiance variability , 2016 .

[9]  J. Haigh,et al.  High solar cycle spectral variations inconsistent with stratospheric ozone observations , 2016, 1602.06397.

[10]  M. Shiotani,et al.  A nudged chemistry‐climate model simulation of chemical constituent distribution at northern high‐latitude stratosphere observed by SMILES and MLS during the 2009/2010 stratospheric sudden warming , 2016 .

[11]  L. Gray,et al.  Solar signals in CMIP‐5 simulations: effects of atmosphere–ocean coupling , 2016 .

[12]  C. Timmreck,et al.  The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 3: the Last Millennium, scientific objective and experimental design for the PMIP4 past1000 simulations (in open review for GMD - doi: 10.5194/gmd-2016-278) , 2016 .

[13]  Chini,et al.  The PMIP 4 contribution to CMIP 6 – Part 3 : the Last Millennium , 2016 .

[14]  Volker Grewe,et al.  Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51 , 2015 .

[15]  D. Shindell,et al.  Solar signals in CMIP‐5 simulations: the ozone response , 2015 .

[16]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Possible impacts of a future grand solar minimum on climate: Stratospheric and global circulation changes , 2015, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[17]  C. Boone,et al.  Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends , 2015 .

[18]  Rolando R. Garcia,et al.  Simulation of polar ozone depletion: An update , 2015 .

[19]  E. Rozanov,et al.  Drivers of the tropospheric ozone budget throughout the 21st century under the medium-high climate scenario RCP 6.0 , 2015 .

[20]  D. Shindell,et al.  Solar signals in CMIP‐5 simulations: the stratospheric pathway , 2015 .

[21]  E. Rozanov,et al.  Evaluation of the ECHAM family radiation codes performance in the representation of the solar signal , 2014 .

[22]  C. Long,et al.  Intercomparison of vertically resolved merged satellite ozone data sets: interannual variability and long-term trends , 2014 .

[23]  R. Stolarski,et al.  Recent changes in total column ozone based on the SBUV Version 8.6 Merged Ozone Data Set , 2014 .

[24]  J. Lean.  Evolution of Total Atmospheric Ozone from 1900 to 2100 Estimated with Statistical Models , 2014 .

[25]  J. Zawodny,et al.  Reevaluation of stratospheric ozone trends from SAGE II data using a simultaneous temporal and spatial analysis , 2014 .

[26]  Robert Damadeo,et al.  SAGE version 7.0 algorithm: application to SAGE II , 2013 .

[27]  D. Marsh,et al.  On the detection of the solar signal in the tropical stratosphere , 2013 .

[28]  J. Zawodny,et al.  Combined SAGE II–GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984–2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone , 2013 .

[29]  Daniel R. Marsh,et al.  Climate change from 1850 to 2005 simulated in CESM1(WACCM) , 2013 .

[30]  E. Remsberg.  On the Response of Halogen Occultation Experiment (Haloe) Stratospheric Oxone and Temperature to the 11-Yr Solar Cycle Forcing , 2013 .

[31]  B. Stevens,et al.  Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI‐ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 , 2013 .

[32]  Chikako Takahashi,et al.  Validation of ozone data from the Superconducting Submillimeter‐Wave Limb‐Emission Sounder (SMILES) , 2013 .

[33]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Paths to accuracy for radiation parameterizations in atmospheric models , 2013 .

[34]  B. Stevens,et al.  Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 , 2013 .

[35]  P. J. Young,et al.  Long‐term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations , 2013 .

[36]  C. Timmreck,et al.  Response of the middle atmosphere to anthropogenic and natural forcings in the CMIP5 simulations with the Max Planck Institute Earth system model , 2013 .

[37]  T. Hinton,et al.  Stratospheric Variability in Twentieth-Century CMIP5 Simulations of the Met Office Climate Model: High Top versus Low Top , 2013 .

[38]  S. Bony,et al.  Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[39]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone and Climate Assessments , 2013 .

[40]  H. Douville,et al.  The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[41]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Aerosol and ozone changes as forcing for climate evolution between 1850 and 2100 , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[42]  E. Rozanov,et al.  The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm , 2012 .

[43]  P. Young,et al.  A vertically resolved, global, gap-free ozone database for assessing or constraining global climate model simulations , 2012 .

[44]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling , 2012, 1303.5577.

[45]  F. Hourdin,et al.  Dynamical amplification of the stratospheric solar response simulated with the Chemistry-Climate Model LMDz-Reprobus , 2012 .

[46]  H. Tsujino,et al.  A New Global Climate Model of the Meteorological Research Institute: MRI-CGCM3 —Model Description and Basic Performance— , 2012 .

[47]  S. Dhomse,et al.  Solar response in tropical stratospheric ozone: a 3-D chemical transport model study using ERA reanalyses , 2011 .

[48]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Ozone database in support of CMIP5 simulations: results and corresponding radiative forcing , 2011 .

[49]  B. Josse,et al.  A new version of the CNRM Chemistry-Climate Model, CNRM-CCM: description and improvements from the CCMVal-2 simulations , 2011 .

[50]  D. Marsh,et al.  The impact of solar spectral irradiance variability on middle atmospheric ozone , 2011 .

[51]  B. Mayer,et al.  Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models , 2011 .

[52]  M. Deushi,et al.  Development of a Meteorological Research Institute Chemistry-Climate Model version 2 for the Study of Tropospheric and Stratospheric Chemistry , 2011 .

[53]  E. Remsberg,et al.  Analysis of SAGE II ozone of the middle and upper stratosphere for its response to a decadal-scale forcing , 2010 .

[54]  Jerald W. Harder,et al.  An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative forcing of climate , 2010, Nature.

[55]  G. Brasseur,et al.  Solar cycle signal in a general circulation and chemistry model with internally generated quasi-biennial oscillation , 2010 .

[56]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  SPARC Report on the Evaluation of Chemistry-Climate Models , 2010 .

[57]  S. Rumbold,et al.  Stratospheric Temperature and Radiative Forcing Response to 11-Year Solar Cycle Changes in Irradiance and Ozone , 2009 .

[58]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  SOLAR INFLUENCES ON CLIMATE , 2009 .

[59]  David A. Plummer,et al.  Technical Note: The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere , 2008 .

[60]  Martin Dameris,et al.  Technical Note: A new global database of trace gases and aerosols from multiple sources of high vertical resolution measurements , 2008 .

[61]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[62]  C. Brühl,et al.  Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of the solar cycle in ozone and temperature , 2008 .

[63]  D. Marsh,et al.  Attribution of decadal variability in lower‐stratospheric tropical ozone , 2007 .

[64]  B. Mayer,et al.  Towards a better representation of the solar cycle in general circulation models , 2007 .

[65]  A. Bais,et al.  The 11-year solar cycle in stratospheric ozone: Comparison between Umkehr and SBUVv8 and effects on surface erythemal irradiance , 2007 .

[66]  W. Randel,et al.  A stratospheric ozone profile data set for 1979–2005: Variability, trends, and comparisons with column ozone data , 2007 .

[67]  Volker Grewe,et al.  Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past , 2006 .

[68]  L. Hood,et al.  Solar cycle variation of stratospheric ozone: Multiple regression analysis of long‐term satellite data sets and comparisons with models , 2006 .

[69]  J. Lean,et al.  Stratospheric ozone variation induced by the 11‐year solar cycle: Recent 22‐year simulation using 3‐D chemical transport model with reanalysis data , 2006 .

[70]  J. Lean,et al.  Modeling the Sun’s Magnetic Field and Irradiance since 1713 , 2005 .

[71]  K. Kodera,et al.  Simulation of radiative and dynamical responses of the middle atmosphere to the 11-year solar cycle , 2005 .

[72]  L. C. Herring,et al.  Solar EUV and UV spectral irradiances and solar indices , 2005 .

[73]  J. C. McConnell,et al.  Doubled CO2‐induced cooling in the middle atmosphere: Photochemical analysis of the ozone radiative feedback , 2004 .

[74]  Katja Matthes,et al.  Transfer of the solar signal from the stratosphere to the troposphere: Northern winter , 2004 .

[75]  E. Manzini,et al.  Chemical and dynamical response to the 11‐year variability of the solar irradiance simulated with a chemistry‐climate model , 2004 .

[76]  Elizabeth C. Kent,et al.  Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century , 2003 .

[77]  H. Lee,et al.  Simulation of the combined effects of solar cycle, quasi-biennial oscillation, and volcanic forcing on stratospheric ozone changes in recent decades , 2003 .

[78]  K. Kodera,et al.  Effect of Solar Activity on the Polar-night Jet Oscillation in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere Winter , 2002 .

[79]  J. Staehelin,et al.  Ozone trends: A review , 2001 .

[80]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations , 2001 .

[81]  Rind,et al.  Solar cycle variability, ozone, and climate , 1999, Science.

[82]  G. Brasseur,et al.  The response of stratospheric ozone to volcanic eruptions : sensitivity to atmospheric chlorine loading , 1995 .

[83]  J. D. Haigh,et al.  The role of stratospheric ozone in modulating the solar radiative forcing of climate , 1994, Nature.

[84]  J. Hansen,et al.  Stratospheric aerosol optical depths, 1850–1990 , 1993 .

[85]  G. Brasseur.  The response of the middle atmosphere to long‐term and short‐term solar variability: A two‐dimensional model , 1993 .

[86]  G. Brasseur,et al.  Stratospheric chemical and thermal response to long‐term variability in solar UV irradiance , 1981 .

[87]  J. Penner,et al.  Possible variations in atmospheric ozone related to the eleven‐year solar cycle , 1978 .