Does Disclosure Reduce Pollution? Evidence from India's Green Rating Project

Public disclosure programs that collect and disseminate information about firms’ environmental performance are increasingly popular in both developed and developing countries. Yet little is known about whether they actually improve environmental performance, particularly in the latter setting. We use detailed plant-level survey data to evaluate the impact of India’s Green Rating Project (GRP) on the environmental performance of the country’s largest pulp and paper plants. We find that the GRP drove significant reductions in pollution loadings among dirty plants but not among cleaner ones. This result comports with statistical and anecdotal evaluations of similar disclosure programs. We also find that plants located in wealthier communities were more responsive to GRP ratings, as were single-plant firms.

[1]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Informal Regulation of Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: Evidence from Indonesia , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  'Voluntary' Approaches to Environmental Regulation: A Survey , 1999 .

[3]  N. Khanna,et al.  Can voluntary pollution prevention programs fulfill their promises? Further evidence from the EPA's 33/50 Program , 2007 .

[4]  Abdoul G. Sam,et al.  1 Voluntary Pollution Reductions and the Enforcement of Environmental Law : An Empirical Study of the 33 / 50 Program , 2004 .

[5]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[6]  A. Blackman,et al.  Community Pressure and Clean Technology in the Informal Sector: An Econometric Analysis of the Adoption of Propane by Traditional Mexican Brickmakers , 1998 .

[7]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Disclosure of Environmental Violations and the Stock Market in the Republic of Korea , 2004 .

[8]  María J. Montes-Sancho,et al.  Information Disclosure Policies: Evidence from the Electricity Industry , 2007 .

[9]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection , 1998 .

[10]  Katja Schumacher,et al.  India's pulp and paper industry: Productivity and energy efficiency , 1999 .

[11]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Pollution and Capital Markets in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[12]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[13]  D. Wheeler Greening Industry: New Roles for Communities, Markets, and Governments , 1999 .

[14]  M. Glachant Non-binding voluntary agreements , 2007 .

[15]  M. Greenstone Estimating Regulation-Induced Substitution: The Effect of the Clean Air Act on Water and Ground Pollution , 2003 .

[16]  Anna Alberini,et al.  The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? , 2000 .

[17]  L. Bui Public Disclosure of Private Information as a Tool for Regulating Environmental Emissions: Firm-Level Responses by Petroleum Refineries to the Toxics Release Inventory , 2005 .

[18]  H. Folmer,et al.  International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2003-2004 , 2001 .

[19]  Dorit Kerret,et al.  What Do We Learn from Emissions Reporting? Analytical Considerations and Comparison of Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers in the United States, Canada, England, and Australia , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Non-mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[21]  T. Sterner,et al.  Public disclosure of industrial pollution: the PROPER approach for Indonesia? , 2007, Environment and Development Economics.

[22]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[23]  Sheila M. Olmstead,et al.  The impacts of the “right to know”: Information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards , 2008 .

[24]  David Wheeler,et al.  Environmental performance rating and disclosure , 2010 .

[25]  Shreekant Gupta,et al.  Do Stock Markets Penalise Environment-Unfriendly Behaviour? Evidence from India , 2003 .

[26]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection? , 1998 .

[27]  John D Spengler,et al.  The toxic release inventory: fact or fiction? A case study of the primary aluminum industry. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  T. Sterner,et al.  Which Firms are More Sensitive to Public Disclosure Schemes for Pollution Control? Evidence from Indonesia’s PROPER Program , 2009 .

[29]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Disclosure Strategies for Pollution Control , 1998 .

[30]  M. Khanna,et al.  Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives , 2002, Land Economics.

[31]  H. Folmer,et al.  The International Yearbook of Environmental And Resource Economics 2006/2007: A Survey of Current Issues , 2006 .

[32]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Disclosure Strategies for Pollution Control , 2006 .

[33]  Shubhashis Gangopadhyay,et al.  Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance , 1995 .

[34]  B. Laplante,et al.  Incentives for Pollution Control: Regulation or Information? , 2002 .

[35]  Allen Blackman,et al.  Alternative Pollution Control Policies in Developing Countries , 2010, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[36]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism , 1998 .

[37]  Bette Hileman,et al.  RIGHT TO KNOW: EPA proposes lower reporting thresholds for persistent bioaccumulative chemicals , 1999 .

[38]  Paul Lanoie,et al.  The Market Response to Environmental Incidents in Canada: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis , 1994 .