Linking Behavioral and Computational Approaches to Better Understand Variant Vowel Pronunciations in Developing Readers.

The overarching goal of the new Florida State University/Haskins Laboratory/University of Connecticut Learning Disability (LD) Hub project is to align computational and behavioral theories of individual word reading development more closely with the challenges of learning to read a quasi-regular orthography (i.e., English) for both typically developing (TD) children and, more specifically, children with dyslexia. Our LD Hub adopts an integrated approach to better understand the neurocognitive bases of individual differences in word reading development by specifically examining the experiential (exogenous) and child-specific (endogenous) factors that determine acquisition of orthographic-phonological knowledge at different subword granularities using behavioral and computational modeling. Findings are intended to enrich understanding of the processes that influence individual differences in word reading development in TD and dyslexic children and significantly inform issues of practice (e.g., curriculum, instruction, diagnosis, and intervention). Here, we briefly provide the rationale for the Hub and present findings from the initial behavioral and computational modeling studies.

[1]  Laura M. Steacy,et al.  Development and Prediction of Context-Dependent Vowel Pronunciation in Elementary Readers , 2019, Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading.

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg Language at the Speed of Sight: How We Read, Why So Many Can't, and What Can Be Done About It , 2017 .

[3]  Jay G Rueckl,et al.  Toward a theory of variation in the organization of the word reading system , 2016, Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading.

[4]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Universal brain signature of proficient reading: Evidence from four contrasting languages , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Jonathan L Preston,et al.  Glutamate and Choline Levels Predict Individual Differences in Reading Ability in Emergent Readers , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Donald L. Compton,et al.  Have We Forsaken Reading Theory in the Name of “Quick Fix” Interventions for Children With Reading Disability? , 2014 .

[7]  K. Pugh,et al.  The relationship between phonological and auditory processing and brain organization in beginning readers , 2013, Brain and Language.

[8]  Jianfeng Yang,et al.  Orthographic influences on division of labor in learning to read Chinese and English: Insights from computational modeling* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[9]  Ram Frost,et al.  Towards a universal model of reading , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Individual differences in skilled adult readers reveal dissociable patterns of neural activity associated with component processes of reading , 2012, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  The role of plasticity-related functional reorganization in the explanation of central dyslexias , 2011, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  Kenneth R. Pugh,et al.  How Children Learn to Read : Current Issues and New Directions in the Integration of Cognition, Neurobiology and Genetics of Reading and Dyslexia Research and Practice , 2011 .

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. , 2011 .

[14]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Jonathan L Preston,et al.  Early and late talkers: school-age language, literacy and neurolinguistic differences. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  William W. Graves,et al.  Neural Systems for Reading Aloud: A Multiparametric Approach , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A quantitative meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  Brett Kessler,et al.  Statistical learning of conditional orthographic correspondences , 2009 .

[20]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[22]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Spelling as Statistical Learning: Using Consonantal Context to Spell Vowels , 2006 .

[23]  Michelle Hampson,et al.  Connectivity–behavior analysis reveals that functional connectivity between left BA39 and Broca's area varies with reading ability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Simulating consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models , 2006 .

[25]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Influence of consonantal context on the reading of vowels: evidence from children. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociating Reading Processes on the Basis of Neuronal Interactions , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[29]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[30]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models , 2003, Cognition.

[31]  P. H. Seymour,et al.  Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[32]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE INFORMS THE TEACHING OF READING , 2022 .

[33]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[34]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables , 2001 .

[35]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[36]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[37]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Angular Gyrus in Developmental Dyslexia: Task-Specific Differences in Functional Connectivity Within Posterior Cortex , 2000, Psychological science.

[38]  David C. Plaut,et al.  A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Rueckl,et al.  The Influence of Morphological Regularities on the Dynamics of a Connectionist Network , 1999, Brain and Language.

[41]  Richard L. Venezky,et al.  The American Way of Spelling: The Structure and Origins of American English Orthography , 1999 .

[42]  G. Whitehurst,et al.  Child development and emergent literacy. , 1998, Child development.

[43]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[44]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[45]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  L. Katz,et al.  The reading process is different for different orthographies : the orthographic depth hypothesis , 1992 .

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  M. Balmuth The Roots of Phonics: A Historical Introduction , 1982 .