Probabilistic Joint Face-Skull Modelling for Facial Reconstruction

We present a novel method for co-registration of two independent statistical shape models. We solve the problem of aligning a face model to a skull model with stochastic optimization based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We create a probabilistic joint face-skull model and show how to obtain a distribution of plausible face shapes given a skull shape. Due to environmental and genetic factors, there exists a distribution of possible face shapes arising from the same skull. We pose facial reconstruction as a conditional distribution of plausible face shapes given a skull shape. Because it is very difficult to obtain the distribution directly from MRI or CT data, we create a dataset of artificial face-skull pairs. To do this, we propose to combine three data sources of independent origin to model the joint face-skull distribution: a face shape model, a skull shape model and tissue depth marker information. For a given skull, we compute the posterior distribution of faces matching the tissue depth distribution with Metropolis-Hastings. We estimate the joint face-skull distribution from samples of the posterior. To find faces matching to an unknown skull, we estimate the probability of the face under the joint face-skull model. To our knowledge, we are the first to provide a whole distribution of plausible faces arising from a skull instead of only a single reconstruction. We show how the face-skull model can be used to rank a face dataset and on average successfully identify the correct match in top 30%. The face ranking even works when obtaining the face shapes from 2D images. We furthermore show how the face-skull model can be useful to estimate the skull position in an MR-image.

[1]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[2]  Liang Chang,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction based on least square support vector regression , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[3]  Zhongke Wu,et al.  A regional method for craniofacial reconstruction based on coordinate adjustments and a new fusion strategy. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[4]  Douglas H Ubelaker,et al.  Craniofacial Superimposition: Historical Review and Current Issues , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Mingquan Zhou,et al.  A PCA-Based method for determining craniofacial relationship and sexual dimorphism of facial shapes , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  T. Vetter,et al.  Shape Modeling Using Gaussian Process Morphable Models , 2017 .

[7]  F. Samavati,et al.  A hierarchical , multi-resolution approach for model-based skull-segmentation in MRI volumes , 2008 .

[8]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis , 1986 .

[9]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A spatially-dense regression study of facial form and tissue depth: towards an interactive tool for craniofacial reconstruction. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[10]  Sami Romdhani,et al.  A 3D Face Model for Pose and Illumination Invariant Face Recognition , 2009, 2009 Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance.

[11]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  The Application of the Central Limit Theorem and the Law of Large Numbers to Facial Soft Tissue Depths: T‐Table Robustness and Trends since 2008 , , 2014, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Maya de Buhan,et al.  A mesh deformation based approach for digital facial reconstruction , 2016 .

[13]  Peter H. Tu,et al.  Automatic Face Recognition from Skeletal Remains , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Forensic Facial Reconstruction , 2004 .

[15]  Yun Tian,et al.  3D face reconstruction from skull by regression modeling in shape parameter spaces , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[16]  Thomas Gerig,et al.  Gaussian Process Morphable Models , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Belma Dogdas,et al.  Segmentation of skull and scalp in 3‐D human MRI using mathematical morphology , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[18]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Computerized craniofacial reconstruction: Conceptual framework and review. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[19]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Facial reconstruction – anatomical art or artistic anatomy? , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[20]  Richa Singh,et al.  On matching skulls to digital face images: A preliminary approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[21]  Yongli Hu,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction based on multi-linear subspace analysis , 2012, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[22]  Francesco Santini,et al.  Face Reconstruction from Skull Shapes and Physical Attributes , 2009, DAGM-Symposium.

[23]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[24]  Bernhard Egger,et al.  A Monte Carlo Strategy to Integrate Detection and Model-Based Face Analysis , 2013, GCPR.

[25]  Fuqing Duan,et al.  Craniofacial Reconstruction Using Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models , 2015, CAIP.

[26]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  Facial Soft Tissue Depths in Craniofacial Identification (Part I): An Analytical Review of the Published Adult Data * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[28]  Yanfeng Sun,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction based on a hierarchical dense deformable model , 2012, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[29]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .