A statistical approach for rain intensity differentiation using Meteosat Second Generation–Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager observations

This study exploits the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG)–Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) observations to evaluate the rain class at high spatial and temporal resolutions and, to this aim, proposes the Rain Class Evaluation from Infrared and Visible observation (RainCEIV) technique. RainCEIV is composed of two modules: a cloud classification algorithm which individuates and characterizes the cloudy pixels, and a supervised classifier that delineates the rainy areas according to the three rainfall intensity classes, the non-rainy (rain rate value -1 ) class, the light-to-moderate rainy class (0.5 mm h −1 ≤ rain rate value -1 ), and the heavy–to-very-heavy-rainy class (rain rate value ≥ 4 mm h -1 ). The second module considers as input the spectral and textural features of the infrared and visible SEVIRI observations for the cloudy pixels detected by the first module. It also takes the temporal differences of the brightness temperatures linked to the SEVIRI water vapour channels as indicative of the atmospheric instability strongly related to the occurrence of rainfall events. The rainfall rates used in the training phase are obtained through the Precipitation Estimation at Microwave frequencies, PEMW (an algorithm for rain rate retrievals based on Atmospheric Microwave Sounder Unit (AMSU)-B observations). RainCEIV's principal aim is that of supplying preliminary qualitative information on the rainy areas within the Mediterranean Basin where there is no radar network coverage. The results of RainCEIV have been validated against radar-derived rainfall measurements from the Italian Operational Weather Radar Network for some case studies limited to the Mediterranean area. The dichotomous assessment related to daytime (nighttime) validation shows that RainCEIV is able to detect rainy/non-rainy areas with an accuracy of about 97% (96%), and when all the rainy classes are considered, it shows a Heidke skill score of 67% (62%), a bias score of 1.36 (1.58), and a probability of detection of rainy areas of 81% (81%).

[1]  Yoshihiko Hamamoto,et al.  A Bootstrap Technique for Nearest Neighbor Classifier Design , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Validation of satellite OPEMW precipitation product with ground-based weather radar and rain gauge networks , 2013 .

[3]  Itamar M. Lensky,et al.  Estimation of Precipitation Area and Rain Intensity Based on the Microphysical Properties Retrieved from NOAA AVHRR Data , 1997 .

[4]  Ralf Bennartz,et al.  Optimal Convolution of AMSU-B to AMSU-A , 2000 .

[5]  Nicholas Kalouptsidis,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification neural networks , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94).

[6]  J. Schmetz,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) , 2002 .

[7]  R. Adler,et al.  Relation of Satellite-Based Thunderstorm Intensity to Radar-Estimated Rainfall , 1981 .

[8]  C. G. Hilborn,et al.  The Condensed Nearest Neighbor Rule , 1967 .

[9]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  On the Use of Dual-Polarized C-Band Radar for Operational Rainfall Retrieval in Mountainous Areas , 2012 .

[10]  Filomena Romano,et al.  Physical and statistical approaches for cloud identification using Meteosat Second Generation-Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager Data , 2008 .

[11]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Technique for Distinguishing Surface and Cloud Types in the Polar Regions , 1987 .

[12]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Multivariate statistical integration of Satellite infrared and microwave radiometric measurements for rainfall retrieval at the geostationary scale , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  V. Levizzani,et al.  Status of satellite precipitation retrievals , 2009 .

[14]  G. Vulpiani,et al.  Definition and impact of a quality index for radar-based reference measurements in the H-SAF precipitation product validation , 2013 .

[15]  R. Scofield,et al.  The Operational GOES Infrared Rainfall Estimation Technique , 1998 .

[16]  Giulia Panegrossi,et al.  The validation service of the hydrological SAF geostationary and polar satellite precipitation products , 2014 .

[17]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  The condensed nearest neighbor rule (Corresp.) , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  Haralambos Feidas,et al.  Classifying convective and stratiform rain using multispectral infrared Meteosat Second Generation satellite data , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[19]  V. Cuomo,et al.  Rainfall estimation from satellite passive microwave observations in the range 89 GHz to 190 GHz , 2009 .

[20]  Itamar M. Lensky,et al.  Clouds-Aerosols-Precipitation Satellite Analysis Tool (CAPSAT) , 2008 .

[21]  Vincenzo Cuomo,et al.  Analysis of Catania Flash Flood Case Study by Using Combined Microwave and Infrared Technique , 2014 .

[22]  A. Gruber,et al.  GOES Multispectral Rainfall Algorithm (GMSRA) , 2001 .

[23]  R. Scofield.  The NESDIS Operational Convective Precipitation- Estimation Technique , 1987 .

[24]  Chris Kidd,et al.  Satellite Rainfall Estimation Using a Combined Pasive Microwave and Infrared Algorithm. , 2003 .

[25]  Roland T. Chin,et al.  Determination of Rainfall Rates from GOES Satellite Images by a Pattern Recognition Technique , 1985 .

[26]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1997 .

[27]  J. Janowiak,et al.  CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2004 .

[28]  Robert F. Adler,et al.  Estimation of Monthly Rainfall over Japan and Surrounding Waters from a Combination of Low-Orbit Microwave and Geosynchronous IR Data , 1993 .

[29]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  Rainfall-Rate Assignment Using MSG SEVIRI Data—A Promising Approach to Spaceborne Rainfall-Rate Retrieval for Midlatitudes , 2010 .

[30]  F. Porcù,et al.  Evaluation of a Satellite Multispectral VIS-IR Daytime Statistical Rain-Rate Classifier and Comparison with Passive Microwave Rainfall Estimates , 2009 .

[31]  Robert F. Adler,et al.  A Satellite Infrared Technique to Estimate Tropical Convective and Stratiform Rainfall , 1988 .

[32]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques , 1991 .

[33]  R. Adler,et al.  Detection of Severe Midwest Thunderstorms Using Geosynchronous Satellite Data , 1985 .

[34]  P. Viswanath,et al.  An improvement to k-nearest neighbor classifier , 2011, 2011 IEEE Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems.

[35]  Thomas Heinemann,et al.  THE EUMETSAT MULTI-SENSOR PRECIPITATION ESTIMATE ( MPE ) , 2004 .

[36]  Giulia Panegrossi,et al.  Precipitation products from the hydrology SAF , 2013 .

[37]  Paolo Sano,et al.  Combined MW-IR Precipitation Evolving Technique (PET) of convective rain fields , 2012 .

[38]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  39 Dimensionality and sample size considerations in pattern recognition practice , 1982, Classification, Pattern Recognition and Reduction of Dimensionality.

[39]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Data mining tasks and methods: Classification: nearest-neighbor approaches , 2002 .

[40]  M. Desbois,et al.  Satellite estimation of the tropical precipitation using the METEOSTAT and SSM/I data , 1994 .

[41]  P. Viswanath,et al.  Rough-fuzzy weighted k-nearest leader classifier for large data sets , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[42]  Joann Parikh,et al.  A comparative study of cloud classification techniques , 1977 .