Certification of herds as free of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection: actual pooled faecal results versus certification model predictions.

Dutch dairy herds closed for at least 3 years with no history of paratuberculosis were recruited for a study on herd-certification. One hundred dairy herds were tested for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis at 6-month intervals by pooled faecal culture (five individual animal samples per pool) with solid media. Ninety of the herds completed 9 herd tests and 10 herds dropped out of the study for reasons other than a paratuberculosis diagnosis. Of the 90 herds completing the full study, 61% eventually were found to be M. paratuberculosis-infected. The number of infected herds detected decreased with each round of testing. Assuming that all infected herds had been detected by the ninth herd test, the observed percentage of herds that were truly noninfected (P-free) after each round of testing was calculated. The observed P-free was compared to the predicted P-free based on a previously reported herd-certification model. The P-free predicted by the model was significantly different from the observed P-free. When a single assumption in the model was changed and a diagnostic sensitivity of 40-50% was selected, the predicted P-free closely approximated the observed P-free for the 90 Dutch dairy herds studied. The critical assumption that was changed for Version 2.0 of the model was within-herd infection prevalence for infected but test-negative herds after each round of serial testing. Model Version 1.0 had assumed a 50% decrease in within-herd prevalence but Version 2.0 assumed a stable within-herd prevalence. Culture of pooled faecal samples provides a high-sensitive, high-specific, low-cost test for herd-certification programs.

[1]  G. Benedictus,et al.  Dutch paratuberculosis programme history, principles and development. , 2000, Veterinary Microbiology.

[2]  S. Shin,et al.  Pooled Fecal Culture Sampling for Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis at Different Herd Sizes and Prevalence , 2003, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[3]  M. R. Hutchings,et al.  Risk factors for Johne's disease in Scotland - the results of a survey of farmers , 2002, Veterinary Record.

[4]  I. Grant,et al.  Comparative evaluation of four decontamination protocols for the isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from milk , 2001, Letters in applied microbiology.

[5]  Sandra M Godden,et al.  Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of individual and pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds. , 2003, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[6]  M. Collins,et al.  Enhanced radiometric detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by using filter-concentrated bovine fecal specimens , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[7]  J. Stabel An Improved Method for Cultivation of Mycobacterium Paratuberculosis from Bovine Fecal Samples and Comparison to Three Other Methods , 1997, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[8]  M. Nielen,et al.  I&R-systeem rund: een analyse ten behoeve van het gebruik tijdens een mond- en klauwzeer-uitbraak in Nederland. , 1996 .

[9]  H. Barkema,et al.  Culture of Strategically Pooled Bovine Fecal Samples as a Method to Screen Herds for Paratuberculosis , 2000, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[10]  E. Manning,et al.  Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. , 2001, Revue scientifique et technique.

[11]  Mohamed Shoukri,et al.  Evaluating the health status of herds based on tests applied to individuals , 1992 .

[12]  R. Haring,et al.  Evaluation of the abilities of three diagnostic tests based on the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in cattle: application in a control program , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[13]  D. Galligan,et al.  Economic consequences of control programs for paratuberculosis in midsize dairy farms in the United States. , 2003, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[14]  S. Wells,et al.  Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. , 2002, American journal of veterinary research.

[15]  Jørgensen Jb An improved medium for culture of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine faeces. , 1982 .

[16]  D. Callihan,et al.  Cultivation of Mycobacterium Paratuberculosis from Bovine Fecal Specimens and a Suggested Standardized Procedure , 1991, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[17]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  A. Naugle,et al.  Sensitivity of test strategies used in the Voluntary Johne's Disease Herd Status Program for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in dairy cattle herds. , 2002, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[19]  V. Lévy-Frébault,et al.  Numerical taxonomy of mycobactin-dependent mycobacteria, emended description of Mycobacterium avium, and description of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium subsp. nov., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis subsp. nov., and Mycobacterium avium subsp. silvaticum subsp. nov. , 1990, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[20]  H. Barkema,et al.  Factors Influencing the Isolation of Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis from Bovine Fecal Samples , 1999, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[21]  M. Collins,et al.  Evaluation of conventional and radiometric fecal culture and a commercial DNA probe for diagnosis of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infections in cattle. , 1992, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[22]  S. More,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of pooled faecal culture and serology as flock-screening tests for detection of ovine paratuberculosis in Australia. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  S. McAllister,et al.  Evaluation of Modified BACTEC 12B Radiometric Medium and Solid Media for Culture of Mycobacterium aviumsubsp. paratuberculosis from Sheep , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[24]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Progress in national control and assurance programs for ovine Johne's disease in Australia. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[25]  G. Eamens,et al.  Comparative sensitivity of various faecal culture methods and ELISA in dairy cattle herds with endemic Johne's disease. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[26]  H. Barkema,et al.  Prevalence and regional distribution of paratuberculosis in dairy herds in The Netherlands. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[27]  T. Carpenter,et al.  Effects of Prevalence and Testing by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Fecal Culture on the Risk of Introduction of Mycobacterium Avium subsp. Paratuberculosis—Infected Cows into Dairy Herds , 2004, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.