Quantification of uncertainty in aerosol optical thickness retrieval arising from aerosol microphysical model and other sources, applied to Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurements

Satellite instruments are nowadays successfully utilised for measuring atmospheric aerosol in many applications as well as in research. Therefore, there is a growing need for rigorous error characterisation of the measurements. Here, we introduce a methodology for quantifying the uncertainty in the retrieval of aerosol optical thickness (AOT). In particular, we concentrate on two aspects: uncertainty due to aerosol microphysical model selection and uncertainty due to imperfect forward modelling. We apply the introduced methodology for aerosol optical thickness retrieval of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura satellite, launched in 2004. We apply statistical methodologies that improve the uncertainty estimates of the aerosol optical thickness retrieval by propagating aerosol microphysical model selection and forward model error more realistically. For the microphysical model selection problem, we utilise Bayesian model selection and model averaging methods. Gaussian processes are utilised to characterise the smooth systematic discrepancies between the measured and modelled reflectances (i.e. residuals). The spectral correlation is composed empirically by exploring a set of residuals. The operational OMI multiwavelength aerosol retrieval algorithm OMAERO is used for cloud-free, over-land pixels of the OMI instrument with the additional Bayesian model selection and model discrepancy techniques introduced here. The method and improved uncertainty characterisation is demonstrated by several examples with different aerosol properties: weakly absorbing aerosols, forest fires over Greece and Russia, and Sahara desert dust. The statistical methodology presented is general; it is not restricted to this particular satellite retrieval application.

[1]  T. Eck,et al.  Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land , 2010 .

[2]  R. L. Curier,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical properties from OMI radiances using a multiwavelength algorithm : Application to Western Europe , 2008 .

[3]  Roy G. Grainger,et al.  Atmospheric Measurement Techniques A sea surface reflectance model for ( A ) ATSR , and application to aerosol retrievals , 2010 .

[4]  Bryan Lawrence,et al.  The GRAPE aerosol retrieval algorithm , 2009 .

[5]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations , 2010 .

[6]  Richard Siddans,et al.  Use of MODIS-derived surface reflectance data in the ORAC-AATSR aerosol retrieval algorithm: Impact of differences between sensor spectral response functions , 2012 .

[7]  Philip Watts,et al.  Joint retrieval of surface reflectance and aerosol optical depth from MSG/SEVIRI observations with an optimal estimation approach: 1. Theory , 2010 .

[8]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[9]  L. Joseph 4. Bayesian data analysis (2nd edn). Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern and Donald B. Rubin (eds), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2003. No. of pages: xxv + 668. Price: $59.95. ISBN 1‐58488‐388‐X , 2004 .

[10]  Henk Eskes,et al.  TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications , 2012 .

[11]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[12]  Menghua Wang,et al.  Uncertainties in satellite remote sensing of aerosols and impact on monitoring its long-term trend: a review and perspective , 2009 .

[13]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[14]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  Optimal estimation for global ground‐level fine particulate matter concentrations , 2013 .

[15]  J. Guerrero-Rascado,et al.  Multi‐instrumental observation of an exceptionally strong Saharan dust outbreak over Portugal , 2011 .

[16]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[17]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[18]  R. L. Curier,et al.  The 2005 and 2006 DANDELIONS NO2 and aerosol intercomparison campaigns , 2008 .

[19]  Alessio Lattanzio,et al.  Joint retrieval of surface reflectance and aerosol optical depth from MSG/SEVIRI observations with an optimal estimation approach: 2. Implementation and evaluation , 2010 .

[20]  Piet Stammes,et al.  Simulation study of the aerosol information content in OMI spectral reflectance measurements , 2007 .

[21]  Andrew M. Sayer,et al.  Validation and uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6 “Deep Blue” aerosol data , 2013 .

[22]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database , 2000 .

[23]  P. Levelt,et al.  Aerosols and surface UV products from Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations: An overview , 2007 .

[24]  Yong Xue,et al.  Integration of remote sensing data and surface observations to estimate the impact of the Russian wildfires over Europe and Asia during August 2010 , 2011 .

[25]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Biomass burning aerosols observed in Eastern Finland during the Russian wildfires in summer 2010 – Part 2: Remote sensing , 2012 .

[26]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: development of an improved multi-class, gene selection and classification tool for microarray data , 2005, Bioinform..

[28]  D. Tanré,et al.  ALGORITHM FOR REMOTE SENSING OF TROPOSPHERIC AEROSOL OVER DARK TARGETS FROM MODIS : Collections 005 and 051 : Revision 2 ; Feb 2009 Product ID : MOD 04 / MYD 04 , 2009 .

[29]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Comparison of aerosol optical depths from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura with results from airborne sunphotometry, other space and ground measurements during MILAGRO/INTEX-B , 2009 .

[30]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[31]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial , 2016 .

[32]  Quintus Kleipool,et al.  Earth surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data , 2008 .

[33]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  The inter-comparison of major satellite aerosol retrieval algorithms using simulated intensity and polarization characteristics of reflected light , 2009 .

[34]  Heikki Saari,et al.  The ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer global aerosol product assessment by comparison with the Aerosol Robotic Network , 2010 .

[36]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  The Bayesian choice : from decision-theoretic foundations to computational implementation , 2007 .

[37]  N. Sifakis,et al.  Satellite monitoring of the biomass-burning aerosols during the wildfires of August 2007 in Greece: Climate implications , 2011 .

[38]  W. R. Howard The Nature of Mathematical Modeling , 2006 .

[39]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[40]  D. Madigan,et al.  Correction to: ``Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial'' [Statist. Sci. 14 (1999), no. 4, 382--417; MR 2001a:62033] , 2000 .