Cartesian analysis and synthesis

This paper aims to provide an explication of the meaning of ‘analysis’ and ‘synthesis’ in Descartes’ writings. In the first part I claim that Descartes’ method is entirely captured by the term ‘analysis’, and that it is a method of theory elaboration that fuses the modern methods of discovery and confirmation in one enterprise. I discuss Descartes’ methodological writings, assess their continuity and coherence, and I address the major shortcoming of previous interpretations of Cartesian methodology. I also discuss the Cartesian method in the context of other conceptions of scientific method of that era and argue that Descartes’ method significantly transforms these conceptions. In the second part I argue that mathematical and naturalphilosophical writings exhibit this kind of analysis. To that effect I examine in Descartes’ writings on the method as used in mathematics, and Descartes’ account of the discovery of the nature of the rainbow in the Meteors. Finally, I briefly assess Descartes’ claim regarding the universality of his method.  2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Descartes and Method in 1637 , 1988, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[2]  Stephen H. Voss Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes , 1993 .

[3]  Emily Grosholz,et al.  Cartesian method and the problem of reduction , 1990 .

[4]  D. Tiemersma Methodological and theoretical aspects of Descartes' treatise on the rainbow , 1988 .

[5]  J. Marenbon Later medieval philosophy (1150-1350) : an introduction , 1991 .

[6]  John Cottingham,et al.  The Cambridge Companion to Descartes , 1992 .

[7]  A. Gewirtz Experience and the Non-Mathematical in the Cartesian Method , 1941 .

[8]  P. Schouls Reason, method, and science in the philosophy of Descartes , 1972 .

[9]  David Rapport Lachterman,et al.  The Ethics of Geometry: A Genealogy of Modernity , 1989 .

[10]  Peter J. Freyd Cartesian logic , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Carl B. Boyer,et al.  The rainbow from myth to mathematics , 1959 .

[12]  H. Feigl,et al.  Readings in the Philosophy of Science , 1954 .

[13]  S. Drake,et al.  Dialogue concerning the Two Chief World Systems , 1954 .

[14]  R. Yeo,et al.  The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method , 1986 .

[15]  R. Descartes,et al.  The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Index , 1985 .

[16]  René Descartes,et al.  Discours de la méthode : suivi d'extraits de la Dioptrique, des Météores, de la Vie de Descartes par Baillet, du Monde, de l'Homme et de lettres , 1966 .

[17]  Thomas L. Heath,et al.  Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements , 1911, The Mathematical Gazette.

[18]  Stephen Gaukroger,et al.  Descartes: An Intellectual Biography , 1996 .

[19]  Nicholas Jardine,et al.  Galileo's road to truth and the demonstrative regress , 1976 .

[20]  C. A. Bonnen,et al.  Descartes and Method: A Search for a Method in Meditations , 1999 .

[21]  A. Rorty Essays on Descartes' Meditations , 2023 .

[22]  M. H. Carré,et al.  Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science, 1100-1700 , 1954 .

[23]  Daniel Garber,et al.  Descartes' Metaphysical Physics , 1992 .

[24]  A. Raftopoulos Newton's Experimental Proofs as Eliminative Reasoning , 1999 .

[25]  J. Sutton,et al.  Descartes' natural philosophy , 2000 .

[26]  Thomas Nickles,et al.  Scientific discovery, logic, and rationality , 1980 .

[27]  L. Beck The Method of Descartes: A Study of the Regulae , 1987 .

[28]  Martin V. Curd,et al.  The Logic of Discovery: An Analysis of Three Approaches , 1980 .

[29]  J. Schuster Cartesian Method as Mythic Speech: A Diachronic and Structural Analysis , 1986 .

[30]  J. Cottingham,et al.  The nature of abstract reasoning: philosophical aspects of Descartes’ work in algebra , 1992 .

[31]  A. R. Hall The power of invention , 1991, Nature.