Comparison of dichotomized and distributional approaches in rare event clinical trial design: a fixed Bayesian design

ABSTRACT This research was motivated by our goal to design an efficient clinical trial to compare two doses of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation for reducing the rate of earliest preterm births (ePTB) and/or preterm births (PTB). Dichotomizing continuous gestational age (GA) data using a classic binomial distribution will result in a loss of information and reduced power. A distributional approach is an improved strategy to retain statistical power from the continuous distribution. However, appropriate distributions that fit the data properly, particularly in the tails, must be chosen, especially when the data are skewed. A recent study proposed a skew-normal method. We propose a three-component normal mixture model and introduce separate treatment effects at different components of GA. We evaluate operating characteristics of mixture model, beta-binomial model, and skew-normal model through simulation. We also apply these three methods to data from two completed clinical trials from the USA and Australia. Finite mixture models are shown to have favorable properties in PTB analysis but minimal benefit for ePTB analysis. Normal models on log-transformed data have the largest bias. Therefore we recommend finite mixture model for PTB study. Either finite mixture model or beta-binomial model is acceptable for ePTB study.

[1]  M. Georgieff,et al.  DHA supplementation and pregnancy outcomes. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Joint Bayesian analysis of birthweight and censored gestational age using finite mixture models , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  C. Reese,et al.  Commensurate Priors on a Finite Mixture Model for Incorporating Repository Data in Clinical Trials , 2016, Statistics in biopharmaceutical research.

[4]  O. Sauzet,et al.  Dichotomisation using a distributional approach when the outcome is skewed , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[5]  M. Schilling,et al.  Is Human Height Bimodal? , 2002 .

[6]  N. T. Gridgeman A Comparison of Two Methods of Analysis of Mixtures of Nomnal Distributions1 , 1970 .

[7]  Patrick Royston,et al.  The cost of dichotomising continuous variables , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  A. Kosinski,et al.  Power considerations when a continuous outcome variable is dichotomized. , 1998, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[9]  R. Gibson,et al.  Effect of DHA supplementation during pregnancy on maternal depression and neurodevelopment of young children: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, JAMA.

[10]  Karalee Poschman,et al.  Cost of Hospitalization for Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants in the United States , 2007, Pediatrics.

[11]  J L Peacock,et al.  Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.