Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects

[1]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[3]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Virtual Hand Illusion Induced by Visuomotor Correlations , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  M. Tsakiris,et al.  Beyond the colour of my skin: How skin colour affects the sense of body-ownership , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[7]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Using Skin Conductance in Judgment and Decision Making Research , 2011 .

[8]  W. IJsselsteijn,et al.  The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. , 2008, Body image.

[9]  M. Tsakiris My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  F. Vignemont Embodiment, ownership and disownership , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  Carmen Weiss,et al.  Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[14]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  M. Tsakiris,et al.  Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition , 2005, Cognition.

[17]  Giovanni Gentile,et al.  The Invisible Hand Illusion: Multisensory Integration Leads to the Embodiment of a Discrete Volume of Empty Space , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[19]  F. Pavani,et al.  The Role of Hand Size in the Fake-Hand Illusion Paradigm , 2007, Perception.

[20]  C. Moore,et al.  Movement and the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2009, Perception.

[21]  D. Lloyd Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  Martin Davies,et al.  Tactile expectations and the perception of self-touch: An investigation using the rubber hand paradigm , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[24]  M S Graziano,et al.  Coding the location of the arm by sight. , 2000, Science.

[25]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Behavioural Brain Research , 1999 .

[26]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  How Social Are Task Representations? , 2009, Psychological science.

[27]  M. Slater,et al.  Measuring the Effects through Time of the Influence of Visuomotor and Visuotactile Synchronous Stimulation on a Virtual Body Ownership Illusion , 2014, Perception.

[28]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  The rubber hand illusion in action , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  B. Hommel,et al.  Acquisition, representation, and control of action , 2009 .

[31]  B. Hommel,et al.  The virtual-hand illusion: effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[32]  D. Chalmers Consciousness and Cognition , 1990 .

[33]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[35]  J. Lagopoulos Electrodermal activity , 2007, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[36]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Towards a Digital Body: The Virtual Arm Illusion , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[37]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  A. Mussap,et al.  Rubber-Hand Illusion , 2012 .

[39]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[40]  B. Hommel IDEOMOTOR ACTION CONTROL: ON THE PERCEPTUAL GROUNDING OF VOLUNTARY ACTIONS AND AGENTS , 2011 .

[41]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[42]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  Self awareness and the body image. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[43]  Charles Spence,et al.  Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Philipp Koehn,et al.  Cognitive Psychology , 1992, Ageing and Society.

[45]  R. Ward,et al.  Virtual limbs and body space: Critical features for the distinction between body space and near-body space. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  B. Hommel Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[47]  B. Hommel Action Control and the Sense of Agency , 2015 .

[48]  Mel Slater,et al.  Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion , 2011, Cognitive Neurodynamics.