Risk, moral value of actions, and mood

In this article the acceptability of risk is related to the moral value of risky actions. Four widely different groups of subjects (clergy, MBA students, prison inmates and pregnant women) judged 20 individual and 20 collective acts with reference to acceptability of risk, moral value, and value and probability of negative and positive consequences. They also rated their current mood. Acceptability of risks was most strongly related to moral value, which thus was found to be an important determiner of acceptability of risk. A depressed mood was associated with a lenient attitude to risks. Societal acts were more negatively evaluated than individual acts. There was a strong positive correlation between values and probabilities of outcomes, both positive and negative.

[1]  L. Sjöberg.  Value change and relapse following a decision to quit or reduce smoking. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. , 1983 .

[3]  L. Perloff,et al.  Perceptions of Vulnerability to Victimization , 1983 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[5]  E Svensson,et al.  The measurement of mood. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—future things , 1975 .

[8]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[9]  O. Svenson.  ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[10]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Affective and semantic components in political person perception. , 1982 .

[12]  Irene Hanson Frieze,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective for Understanding Reactions to Victimization , 1983 .

[13]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[14]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Impact of directly and indirectly experienced events: The origin of crime-related judgments and behaviors. , 1980 .

[15]  T. Tyler,et al.  The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. , 1984 .

[16]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[17]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Mood and belief-value correlation , 1983 .

[18]  L. Sjöberg.  Aided and unaided decision making: Improving intuitive judgement , 1982 .

[19]  C. Starr.  Social benefit versus technological risk. , 1969, Science.