Computer-assisted initial diagnosis of rare diseases

Introduction. Most documented rare diseases have genetic origin. Because of their low individual frequency, an initial diagnosis based on phenotypic symptoms is not always easy, as practitioners might never have been exposed to patients suffering from the relevant disease. It is thus important to develop tools that facilitate symptom-based initial diagnosis of rare diseases by clinicians. In this work we aimed at developing a computational approach to aid in that initial diagnosis. We also aimed at implementing this approach in a user friendly web prototype. We call this tool Rare Disease Discovery. Finally, we also aimed at testing the performance of the prototype. Methods. Rare Disease Discovery uses the publicly available ORPHANET data set of association between rare diseases and their symptoms to automatically predict the most likely rare diseases based on a patient’s symptoms. We apply the method to retrospectively diagnose a cohort of 187 rare disease patients with confirmed diagnosis. Subsequently we test the precision, sensitivity, and global performance of the system under different scenarios by running large scale Monte Carlo simulations. All settings account for situations where absent and/or unrelated symptoms are considered in the diagnosis. Results. We find that this expert system has high diagnostic precision (≥80%) and sensitivity (≥99%), and is robust to both absent and unrelated symptoms. Discussion. The Rare Disease Discovery prediction engine appears to provide a fast and robust method for initial assisted differential diagnosis of rare diseases. We coupled this engine with a user-friendly web interface and it can be freely accessed at http://disease-discovery.udl.cat/. The code and most current database for the whole project can be downloaded from https://github.com/Wrrzag/DiseaseDiscovery/tree/no_classifiers.

[1]  T. van Mieghem,et al.  Phenotip - a web-based instrument to help diagnosing fetal syndromes antenatally , 2014, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[2]  P. Facchin,et al.  The importance of helplines in National Plans , 2014, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[3]  Paul Landais,et al.  The French national registry for rare diseases: an integrated model from care to epidemiology and research , 2014, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[4]  Ole Winther,et al.  FindZebra - the search engine for difficult medical cases , 2014, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[5]  D. Taruscio,et al.  Rare diseases research and practice. , 2014, Endocrine development.

[6]  K. Cresswell,et al.  Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA , 2014, The Lancet.

[7]  José Luís Oliveira,et al.  An innovative portal for rare genetic diseases research: The semantic Diseasecard , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  Philip J. Kroth,et al.  The NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research Patient Registry Standard: A Report from the University of New Mexico's Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy Patient Registry , 2013, AMIA.

[9]  A. Sheikh,et al.  The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Michael Brudno,et al.  PhenoTips: Patient Phenotyping Software for Clinical and Research Use , 2013, Human mutation.

[11]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  ‘You can’t just hit a button’: an ethnographic study of strategies to repurpose data from advanced clinical information systems for clinical process improvement , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[12]  Ole Winther,et al.  FindZebra: A search engine for rare diseases , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  S. Maiella,et al.  Orphanet et son réseau : où trouver une information validée sur les maladies rares , 2013 .

[14]  A. Haines,et al.  The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technologies to Improve Health Care Service Delivery Processes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[15]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[16]  T. Lancet,et al.  Technologies for global health , 2012, The Lancet.

[17]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Machine learning and radiology , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  F. Dhombres,et al.  Representation of rare diseases in health information systems: The orphanet approach to serve a wide range of end users , 2012, Human mutation.

[19]  A. Sheikh,et al.  A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis , 2012, The Lancet.

[20]  P. Taylor,et al.  Recommendations for research design and reporting in computer-assisted diagnosis to facilitate meta-analysis , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[21]  D. Levick,et al.  Differential Diagnosis Generators: an Evaluation of Currently Available Computer Programs , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  M. Kenward,et al.  Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[23]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnography , 2011, BMC medicine.

[24]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[25]  S. Koutouzov The European research area network – E-Rare , 2010, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[26]  A. Haines,et al.  The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[27]  Ralf Hofestädt,et al.  RAMEDIS: a comprehensive information system for variations and corresponding phenotypes of rare metabolic diseases , 2010, Human mutation.

[28]  Marcel H. Schulz,et al.  Clinical diagnostics in human genetics with semantic similarity searches in ontologies. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  Arrigo Schieppati,et al.  Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue , 2008, The Lancet.

[30]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Creating and Validating an Algorithm to Measure AIDS Mortality in the Adult Population using Verbal Autopsy , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[31]  P. Gabow,et al.  The Effect of Automated Alerts on Provider Ordering Behavior in an Outpatient Setting , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[32]  Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  telederm.org: Freely Available Online Consultations in Dermatology , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[33]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[34]  A Lavandeira,et al.  Orphan drugs: legal aspects, current situation , 2002, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[35]  G. Barnett,et al.  DXplain. An evolving diagnostic decision-support system. , 1987, JAMA.

[36]  Damian Smedley,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  S. Maiella,et al.  [Orphanet and its consortium: where to find expert-validated information on rare diseases]. , 2013, Revue neurologique.

[38]  M. F. Craig A. Umscheid MD,et al.  A Follow-Up Report Card on Computer-Assisted Diagnosis—the Grade: C+ , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[39]  J. Naylor,et al.  Mendelian inheritance in man: A catalog of human genes and genetic disorders , 1996 .