A focus group study on the design considerations and impressions of a socially assistive robot for long-term care

As older adults age, they are more likely to reside in long-term care facilities due to the decline in cognitive and/or physical abilities that prevent them from living independently. With a rapidly aging population there is an increasing demand on long-term care facilities to care for older adults. Such facilities need to provide medical services, assistance in activities of daily living, and scheduled leisure activities to improve health and quality of life. However, as the need for long-term care is increasing, the care workforce is faced with decreasing numbers of healthcare staff and high turnover rates. Our research focuses on the design of socially assistive robots to plan, schedule, and facilitate social and cognitive interventions for residents in long-term care facilities. In this paper, we investigate the specific design considerations and the impressions of long-term care residents, healthcare professionals, and family members on a socially assistive robot designed to autonomously facilitate cognitively and socially stimulating leisure activities. Thematic analysis of focus group sessions conducted at a long-term care facility with the aforementioned individuals revealed important design considerations for the development and integration of a socially assistive robot in long-term care facilities.

[1]  B. MacDonald,et al.  Attitudes towards health‐care robots in a retirement village , 2012, Australasian journal on ageing.

[2]  Ian Robinson,et al.  User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. , 2006, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[3]  Goldie Nejat,et al.  Brian 2.1: A socially assistive robot for the elderly and cognitively impaired , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  L. Aller,et al.  Quality of life: its meaning to the long-term care resident. , 1995, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[5]  G. Lafortune,et al.  Trends in Severe Disability Among Elderly People: Assessing the Evidence in 12 OECD Countries and the Future Implications , 2007 .

[6]  F. Colombo Help wanted? : providing and paying for long-term care , 2011 .

[7]  L. Yardley,et al.  Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology , 2003 .

[8]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[9]  Robert Elliott,et al.  Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research , 2005 .

[10]  K. Covinsky,et al.  Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  Benjamin P. Sobel Bingo vs. physical intervention in stimulating short-term cognition in Alzheimer's disease patients , 2001, American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

[12]  Ya-Huei Wu,et al.  Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. , 2012, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[13]  D. Mehr,et al.  MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  Dee G. Appley Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[15]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Resident contact with family and friends following nursing home admission. , 2001, The Gerontologist.

[16]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[17]  Jane Seale,et al.  Older people as partners in assistive technology research: The use of focus groups in the design process , 2002 .

[18]  Nan Li,et al.  World Population Prospects, the 2010 Revision: Estimation and projection methodology , 2011 .

[19]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  R Lubinski,et al.  Perception of spoken communication by elderly chronically ill patients in an institutional setting. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[22]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[23]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[24]  J. Christopher Beck,et al.  An autonomous assistive robot for planning, scheduling and facilitating multi-user activities , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..