Propose with a rose? Signaling in internet dating markets

Abstract A growing number of papers theoretically study the effects of introducing a preference signaling mechanism. However, the empirical literature has had difficulty proving a basic tenet, namely that an agent has more success when the agent uses a signal. This paper provides evidence based on a field experiment in an online dating market. Participants are randomly endowed with two or eight “virtual roses” that a participant can use for free to signal special interest when asking for a date. Our results show that, by sending a rose, a person can substantially increase the chance of the offer being accepted, and this positive effect is neither because the rose attracts attention from recipients nor because the rose is associated with unobserved quality. Furthermore, we find evidence that roses increase the total number of dates, instead of crowding out offers without roses attached. Despite the positive effect of sending roses, a substantial fraction of participants do not fully utilize their endowment of roses and even those who exhaust their endowment on average do not properly use their roses to maximize their dating success.

[1]  Matthew D. Kim,et al.  Early decision and financial aid competition among need-blind colleges and universities , 2010 .

[2]  Dan Ariely,et al.  What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating , 2010 .

[3]  A. Roth,et al.  The Job Market for New Economists: A Market Design Perspective , 2010 .

[4]  Adeline Delavande,et al.  Marrying Up: The Role of Sex Ratio in Assortative Matching , 2009 .

[5]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Marry for What? Caste and Mate Selection in Modern India , 2009 .

[6]  Jonathan Levin,et al.  Early Admissions at Selective Colleges , 2009 .

[7]  Sam-Ho Lee,et al.  Jumping the Curse: Early Contracting with Private Information in University Admissions , 2009 .

[8]  Peter S. Arcidiacono,et al.  Beyond Signaling and Human Capital: Education and the Revelation of Ability , 2008 .

[9]  Günter J. Hitsch,et al.  Matching and Sorting in Online Dating , 2008 .

[10]  Erik Hurst,et al.  Conspicuous Consumption and Race , 2007 .

[11]  A. Roth,et al.  The Market for Federal Judicial Law Clerks , 2007 .

[12]  Fabian Lange,et al.  The Speed of Employer Learning , 2007, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  H. Fang,et al.  Disentangling the College Wage Premium: Estimating a Model with Endogenous Education Choices , 2006 .

[14]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment , 2006 .

[15]  Paul Oyer,et al.  Initial Labor Market Conditions and Long-Term Outcomes for Economists , 2006 .

[16]  A. Siow,et al.  Who Marries Whom and Why , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  R. Kurzban,et al.  HurryDate: Mate preferences in action , 2005 .

[18]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Racial Preferences in Dating: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment , 2004 .

[19]  Francis Bloch,et al.  Wedding Celebrations as Conspicuous Consumption , 2004, The Journal of Human Resources.

[20]  A. Roth,et al.  Market Culture: How Norms Governing Exploding Offers Affect Market Performance , 2004 .

[21]  A. Roth,et al.  Unraveling Reduces Mobility in a Labor Market: Gastroenterology with and without a Centralized Match , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[23]  Linda Y. Wong,et al.  Structural Estimation of Marriage Models , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[24]  J. Angrist How Do Sex Ratios Affect Marriage and Labor Markets? Evidence from America's Second Generation , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Kelly Bedard,et al.  Human Capital versus Signaling Models: University Access and High School Dropouts , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Richard J. Murnane,et al.  Estimating the Labor Market Signaling Value of the GED , 2000 .

[27]  A. Roth,et al.  The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design , 1999, The American economic review.

[28]  C. Pierret,et al.  Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination , 1997 .

[29]  A. Roth,et al.  Turnaround Time and Bottlenecks in Market Clearing: Decentralized Matching in the Market for Clinical Psychologists , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  Andrew M Weiss Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages , 1995 .

[31]  R. Johnstone SEXUAL SELECTION, HONEST ADVERTISEMENT AND THE HANDICAP PRINCIPLE: REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE , 1995, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[32]  Adrian L. R. Thomas On the aerodynamics of birds’ tails , 1993 .

[33]  Robert S Gibbons,et al.  Learning and Wage Dynamics , 1991 .

[34]  M. Schreiber The Job Market , 1990 .

[35]  Kevin Lang,et al.  Human Capital Versus Sorting: The Effects of Compulsory Attendance Laws , 1986 .

[36]  A. Roth The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  M. Spence Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[40]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[41]  R A Fisher,et al.  The evolution of sexual preference. , 1915, The Eugenics review.

[42]  Soohyung Lee Marriage and Online Mate-Search Services: Evidence From South Korea , 2009 .

[43]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Racial Preferences in Dating , 2008 .

[44]  Peter Coles,et al.  Signaling in Matching Markets , 2006 .

[45]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  What Will Be Needed for the New GI Fellowship Match to Succeed , 2006 .

[46]  A. Roth,et al.  What will be needed for the new gastroenterology fellowship match to succeed? , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[47]  G. Semenza The Job Market , 2005 .

[48]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Early Admissions Game: Joining the Elite , 2004 .

[49]  John H. Tyler WHAT IS THE VALUE OF THE GED TO DROPOUTS WHO PURSUE THE CREDENTIAL ? , 2003 .

[50]  B. Douglas Bernheim,et al.  Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption , 1996 .

[51]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[52]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  The theory of the leisure class : an economic study of institutions , 1953 .