A gradient activation method for direct methanol fuel cells

Abstract To realize gradient activation effect and recover catalytic activity of catalyst in a short time, a gradient activation method has firstly been proposed for enhancing discharge performance and perfecting activation mechanism of the direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). This method includes four steps, i.e. proton activation, activity recovery activation, H2-O2 mode activation and forced discharging activation. The results prove that the proposed method has gradually realized replenishment of water and protons, recovery of catalytic activity of catalyst, establishment of transfer channels for electrons, protons, and oxygen, and optimization of anode catalyst layer for methanol transfer in turn. Along with the novel activation process going on, the DMFC discharge performance has been improved, step by step, to more than 1.9 times higher than that of the original one within 7.5 h. This method provides a practicable activation way for the real application of single DMFCs and stacks.

[1]  Yituo Wang,et al.  The performance and mechanism of multi-step activation of MEA for DMFC , 2010 .

[2]  Zhe Tian,et al.  Anode catalyst layer with novel microstructure for a direct methanol fuel cell , 2012 .

[3]  A. Rouboa,et al.  An activation procedure applied to fluorinated and non-fluorinated proton exchange membranes , 2012 .

[4]  Yituo Wang,et al.  A novel anode catalyst layer with multilayer and pore structure for improving the performance of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2013 .

[5]  Hongwei Zhou,et al.  Structure optimization of cathode microporous layer for direct methanol fuel cells , 2015 .

[6]  Yituo Wang,et al.  Pore‐forming technology and performance of MEA for direct methanol fuel cells , 2013 .

[7]  Chang-Bock Chung,et al.  Modeling and operation optimization of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system for maximum efficiency , 2016 .

[8]  Hongwei Zhou,et al.  Effect of fabrication and operating parameters on electrochemical property of anode and cathode for direct methanol fuel cells , 2016 .

[9]  M. Umeda,et al.  Two-step conditioning method for high power-generating direct methanol fuel cells , 2013 .

[10]  Adélio Mendes,et al.  Activation procedures characterization of MEA based on phosphoric acid doped PBI membranes , 2010 .

[11]  Ji Young Kim,et al.  A study on anode diffusion layer for performance enhancement of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2016 .

[12]  D. Nikles,et al.  Synthesis and activation of Pt nanoparticles with controlled size for fuel cell electrocatalysts , 2007 .

[13]  R. Behm,et al.  Methanol Electrooxidation over Pt/C Fuel Cell Catalysts: Dependence of Product Yields on Catalyst Loading , 2003 .

[14]  D. Stolten,et al.  Influence of the ionomer type in direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) anode catalyst layers on the properties of primary and secondary pores , 2013 .

[15]  Yituo Wang,et al.  Study on stability of self-breathing DFMC with EIS method and three-electrode system , 2013 .

[16]  S. Kamarudin,et al.  Performance of direct methanol fuel cell with a palladium-silica nanofibre/Nafion composite membrane , 2013 .

[17]  K. F. Blurton,et al.  Surface area loss of platinum supported on graphite , 1978 .

[18]  Klaus Wippermann,et al.  Bifunctional activation of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2007 .

[19]  A. Manthiram,et al.  Comparison of the membrane-electrode assembly conditioning procedures for direct methanol fuel cells , 2012 .